FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2626830292> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2626830292 endingPage "524" @default.
• W2626830292 startingPage "515" @default.
• W2626830292 abstract "Background Tumor location is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer. However, the optimal extent of resection according to tumor location remains unclear. Methods We reviewed the records of 192 patients with T2 gallbladder cancer who underwent R0 or R1 resection at 6 institutions. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were compared according to the extent of resection between hepatic-sided (n = 93) and peritoneal-sided (n = 99) tumors. Results After a median follow-up of 30 months, the 5-year overall survival (84.9% vs 71.8%, P = .048) and recurrence-free survival (74.6% vs 62.2%, P = .060) were greater in peritoneal-sided T2 patients than in hepatic-sided T2 patients. Among hepatic-sided T2 patients, the 5-year overall survival was greater in patients who underwent radical cholecystectomy including lymph node dissection with liver resection than in patients who underwent lymph node dissection without liver resection (80.3% vs 30.0%, P = .032), and the extent of liver resection was not associated with overall survival (P = .526). Lymph node dissection without liver resection was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in hepatic-sided T2 gallbladder cancer (hazard ratio 5.009, 95% confidence interval 1.512–16.596, P = .008). In peritoneal-sided T2 patients, the 5-year overall survival was not significantly different between the lymph node dissection with liver resection and the lymph node dissection without liver resection subgroups (70.5% vs 54.8%, P = .111) and the extent of lymph node dissection was not associated with overall survival (P = .395). Conclusion In peritoneal-sided T2 gallbladder cancer, radical cholecystectomy including lymph node dissection without liver resection is a reasonable operative option. Radical cholecystectomy including lymph node dissection with liver resection is suitable for hepatic-sided T2 gallbladder cancer. Tumor location is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer. However, the optimal extent of resection according to tumor location remains unclear. We reviewed the records of 192 patients with T2 gallbladder cancer who underwent R0 or R1 resection at 6 institutions. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were compared according to the extent of resection between hepatic-sided (n = 93) and peritoneal-sided (n = 99) tumors. After a median follow-up of 30 months, the 5-year overall survival (84.9% vs 71.8%, P = .048) and recurrence-free survival (74.6% vs 62.2%, P = .060) were greater in peritoneal-sided T2 patients than in hepatic-sided T2 patients. Among hepatic-sided T2 patients, the 5-year overall survival was greater in patients who underwent radical cholecystectomy including lymph node dissection with liver resection than in patients who underwent lymph node dissection without liver resection (80.3% vs 30.0%, P = .032), and the extent of liver resection was not associated with overall survival (P = .526). Lymph node dissection without liver resection was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in hepatic-sided T2 gallbladder cancer (hazard ratio 5.009, 95% confidence interval 1.512–16.596, P = .008). In peritoneal-sided T2 patients, the 5-year overall survival was not significantly different between the lymph node dissection with liver resection and the lymph node dissection without liver resection subgroups (70.5% vs 54.8%, P = .111) and the extent of lymph node dissection was not associated with overall survival (P = .395). In peritoneal-sided T2 gallbladder cancer, radical cholecystectomy including lymph node dissection without liver resection is a reasonable operative option. Radical cholecystectomy including lymph node dissection with liver resection is suitable for hepatic-sided T2 gallbladder cancer." @default.
• W2626830292 created "2017-06-23" @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5000792607 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5001755360 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5010216130 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5011448469 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5014335370 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5017943773 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5019551083 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5019991422 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5025039528 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5025489148 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5035722544 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5036547217 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5040692559 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5045899801 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5046340636 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5053464396 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5066380327 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5070270756 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5077434713 @default.
• W2626830292 creator A5077739975 @default.
• W2626830292 date "2017-09-01" @default.
• W2626830292 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2626830292 title "Do hepatic-sided tumors require more extensive resection than peritoneal-sided tumors in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer? Results of a retrospective multicenter study" @default.
• W2626830292 cites W1419647615 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W1480537273 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W1712452699 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W1984672660 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2000185557 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2000373561 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2005964715 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2050646684 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2055039184 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2056099284 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2056467912 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2061202383 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2061743515 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2067990116 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2091776352 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2125500603 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2131509390 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2132577566 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2256928551 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2409872962 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2915519805 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W4252845458 @default.
• W2626830292 cites W2202543369 @default.
• W2626830292 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.004" @default.
• W2626830292 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28629653" @default.
• W2626830292 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2626830292 type Work @default.
• W2626830292 sameAs 2626830292 @default.
• W2626830292 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2626830292 countsByYear W26268302922018 @default.
• W2626830292 countsByYear W26268302922019 @default.
• W2626830292 countsByYear W26268302922020 @default.
• W2626830292 countsByYear W26268302922021 @default.
• W2626830292 countsByYear W26268302922022 @default.
• W2626830292 countsByYear W26268302922023 @default.
• W2626830292 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5000792607 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5001755360 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5010216130 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5011448469 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5014335370 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5017943773 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5019551083 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5019991422 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5025039528 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5025489148 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5035722544 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5036547217 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5040692559 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5045899801 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5046340636 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5053464396 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5066380327 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5070270756 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5077434713 @default.
• W2626830292 hasAuthorship W2626830292A5077739975 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C2776283816 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C2776534502 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C2777148285 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConceptScore W2626830292C126322002 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConceptScore W2626830292C126838900 @default.
• W2626830292 hasConceptScore W2626830292C141071460 @default.

• next