FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W266342614> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W266342614 startingPage "85" @default.
• W266342614 abstract "THE PAST 30 Y EARS HAVE WITNESSED A TRANSFORMATION IN THE GOVERNANCE OF RISK and security, one that has been marked by a distinct movement away from the public provision of policing and toward both marketized and community-based forms of security (Bayley and Shearing, 2001; see also Crawford, 1997; Eick, 2003; Garland, 2001 ; Rigakos, 2002; Rosenbaum, 1988; Ward, 2006). In U.S. cities this double movement has been executed through a proliferation of community policing initiatives and a sharp rise in the use of private security contractors, not just by the private sector, but by the public sector as well. This movement downward and outward from the state has followed the popular ascendancy of a new discourse of insecurity--a root-and-branch critique of the role and effectiveness of public policing in contemporary society. Since the 1960s, frequent depictions of mounting urban unrest--bombed inner-city neighborhoods, street-gang warfare, and urban rioting (see Banfieid, 1968; Chicago Tribune, 1986; Welch, Price, and Yankey, 2002)--have formed the backdrop and been the justification for renewed calls for law-and-order style policing. The ideo-political arguments that underpin this critique are varied, and include notions about state failure and a concomitant expansion of the role of civil society and markets in managing security concerns. The state's ability to effectively deter crime and punish offenders has frequently been described by proponents of law-and-order policing as having been fundamentally eroded by bureaucratic constraints and cumbersome procedural rules that have hamstrung public policing efforts and undermined the capacity of the criminal justice system to mete out appropriate punishment (see Braithwaite and Pettit, 1990; Reinharz, 1996; Garland, 2000; Bayley and Shearing, 2001). This critique of public policing in the contemporary context strikes at the core of modernist ideas of crime and antisocial behavior. Whereas these traditionally have been seen as problems arising out of deprivation and limited economic opportunity, they now are viewed as resulting from inadequate social and self-control. Citing varying interpretations of crime rates as an example of the shift in the commonsense understanding of insecurity, David Garland (200l: 20) notes that where high crime ... rates would once have been attributed to implementation-failure ... they are now interpreted as evidence of theory-failure: as signs that crime control is based upon an institutional model that is singularly inappropriate for its task. In other words, proponents of this critique charge that rather than simply stepping up existing law enforcement efforts, a paradigm shift that re-conceptualizes policing is necessary. If public law enforcement is to rise to this challenge, new partners, technologies, and strategies will be required. This has led to, among other things, increased calls for non-state forms of policing, particularly commoditized forms of security that can be made available and purchased through markets. The dominant critique of public policing is laced with neoliberal ideology that lauds the virtues of private-sector managerialism (which is seen as an antidote to the overly bureaucratic public sector) and market efficiencies that are said to come from privatization. Neoconservative social commentators have seized on this critique to advance their own vision of policing, one that has been extraordinarily successful in reshaping popular opinion on policing and public safety. The resulting commonsense understanding of security--that the police cannot be everywhere, that more security is needed, and that effective crime control begins with the maintenance of social order (along the lines of the broken windows thesis)--has (unintentionally perhaps) laid the foundation for the rapid growth of the private security industry in major U.S. cities. This article explores the expansion of private security provision that has been underway in Chicago. …" @default.
• W266342614 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W266342614 creator A5047602207 @default.
• W266342614 creator A5069585273 @default.
• W266342614 creator A5072332574 @default.
• W266342614 date "2006-09-22" @default.
• W266342614 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W266342614 title "Securing the City: Emerging Markets in the Private Provision of Security Services in Chicago" @default.
• W266342614 cites W153388477 @default.
• W266342614 cites W1540489805 @default.
• W266342614 cites W1602929454 @default.
• W266342614 cites W1965726351 @default.
• W266342614 cites W1976900267 @default.
• W266342614 cites W1978839234 @default.
• W266342614 cites W1998921366 @default.
• W266342614 cites W2005375358 @default.
• W266342614 cites W2043053003 @default.
• W266342614 cites W2057761296 @default.
• W266342614 cites W2076228232 @default.
• W266342614 cites W2087217722 @default.
• W266342614 cites W2106268550 @default.
• W266342614 cites W2796575992 @default.
• W266342614 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W266342614 type Work @default.
• W266342614 sameAs 266342614 @default.
• W266342614 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W266342614 countsByYear W2663426142014 @default.
• W266342614 countsByYear W2663426142015 @default.
• W266342614 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W266342614 hasAuthorship W266342614A5047602207 @default.
• W266342614 hasAuthorship W266342614A5069585273 @default.
• W266342614 hasAuthorship W266342614A5072332574 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C2778358470 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C2779453331 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C2780224667 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C2780262971 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W266342614 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C138921699 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C144024400 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C162324750 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C17744445 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C187736073 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C199539241 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C2778358470 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C2779453331 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C2780224667 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C2780262971 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C3116431 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C39389867 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C51575053 @default.
• W266342614 hasConceptScore W266342614C94625758 @default.
• W266342614 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W266342614 hasLocation W2663426141 @default.
• W266342614 hasOpenAccess W266342614 @default.
• W266342614 hasPrimaryLocation W2663426141 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W1495420757 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W1500297079 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2007594419 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2015837936 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2025452060 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2040219846 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2055707968 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2080808214 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2092823498 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2142068220 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2150780340 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2154399800 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2296071652 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2461639611 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W277060013 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W289530193 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W2967576889 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W3101324472 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W594919015 @default.
• W266342614 hasRelatedWork W628767596 @default.
• W266342614 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W266342614 isParatext "false" @default.
• W266342614 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W266342614 magId "266342614" @default.
• W266342614 workType "article" @default.