FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2697563670> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2697563670 endingPage "1392" @default.
• W2697563670 startingPage "1382" @default.
• W2697563670 abstract "Abstract Background Recent randomized trials demonstrated that laparoscopic lavage compared with resection for Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis was associated with similar mortality, less stoma formation but a higher rate of early reintervention. The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes in patients who participated in the randomized Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) trial. Methods Between February 2010 and June 2014, patients from 21 hospitals in Norway and Sweden presenting with suspected perforated diverticulitis were enrolled in a multicentre RCT comparing laparoscopic lavage and sigmoid resection. All patients with perforated diverticulitis confirmed during surgery were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis of 1-year results. Results Of 199 enrolled patients, 101 were assigned randomly to laparoscopic lavage and 98 to colonic resection. Perforated diverticulitis was confirmed at the time of surgery in 89 and 83 patients respectively. Within 1 year after surgery, neither severe complications (34 versus 27 per cent; P = 0·323) nor disease-related mortality (12 versus 11 per cent) differed significantly between the lavage and surgery groups. Among the 144 patients with purulent peritonitis, the rate of severe complications (27 per cent (20 of 74) versus 21 per cent (15 of 70) respectively; P = 0·445) and disease-related mortality (8 versus 9 per cent) were similar. Laparoscopic lavage was associated with more deep surgical-site infections (32 versus 13 per cent; P = 0·006) but fewer superficial surgical-site infections (1 versus 17 per cent; P = 0·001). More patients in the lavage group underwent unplanned reoperations (27 versus 10 per cent; P = 0·010). Including stoma reversals, a similar proportion of patients required a secondary operation (28 versus 29 per cent). The stoma rate at 1 year was lower in the lavage group (14 versus 42 per cent in the resection group; P &lt; 0·001); however, the Cleveland Global Quality of Life score did not differ between groups. Conclusion The advantages of laparoscopic lavage should be weighed against the risk of secondary intervention (if sepsis is unresolved). Assessment to exclude malignancy (although uncommon) is advised. Registration number: NCT01047462 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)." @default.
• W2697563670 created "2017-06-30" @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5017168565 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5023584302 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5029655913 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5040631542 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5054521444 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5066825043 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5070951693 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5077486628 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5079226873 @default.
• W2697563670 creator A5079696328 @default.
• W2697563670 date "2017-06-20" @default.
• W2697563670 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2697563670 title "One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage <i>versus</i> primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis" @default.
• W2697563670 cites W1689180275 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W1690979496 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W1851591072 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W1974312485 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W1981998074 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2000445173 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2010778447 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2015942344 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2019503585 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2025170048 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2033496749 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2051912678 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2060695906 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2064447097 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2079405173 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2086254700 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2088209371 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2092710805 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2093058755 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2118094961 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2146379177 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2164404874 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2252383927 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2265914419 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2316573242 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W2598442111 @default.
• W2697563670 cites W49436884 @default.
• W2697563670 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10567" @default.
• W2697563670 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28631827" @default.
• W2697563670 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2697563670 type Work @default.
• W2697563670 sameAs 2697563670 @default.
• W2697563670 citedByCount "54" @default.
• W2697563670 countsByYear W26975636702017 @default.
• W2697563670 countsByYear W26975636702018 @default.
• W2697563670 countsByYear W26975636702019 @default.
• W2697563670 countsByYear W26975636702020 @default.
• W2697563670 countsByYear W26975636702021 @default.
• W2697563670 countsByYear W26975636702022 @default.
• W2697563670 countsByYear W26975636702023 @default.
• W2697563670 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5017168565 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5023584302 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5029655913 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5040631542 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5054521444 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5066825043 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5070951693 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5077486628 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5079226873 @default.
• W2697563670 hasAuthorship W2697563670A5079696328 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C179755657 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C2777929615 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C2778686235 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C2780637204 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C141071460 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C168563851 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C179755657 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C2776111594 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C2777929615 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C2778686235 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C2780047204 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C2780637204 @default.
• W2697563670 hasConceptScore W2697563670C71924100 @default.
• W2697563670 hasFunder F4320327604 @default.
• W2697563670 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2697563670 hasLocation W26975636701 @default.
• W2697563670 hasLocation W26975636702 @default.
• W2697563670 hasOpenAccess W2697563670 @default.
• W2697563670 hasPrimaryLocation W26975636701 @default.
• W2697563670 hasRelatedWork W2001357889 @default.
• W2697563670 hasRelatedWork W2083166340 @default.
• W2697563670 hasRelatedWork W2170478492 @default.
• W2697563670 hasRelatedWork W2369526291 @default.
• W2697563670 hasRelatedWork W2373562280 @default.
• W2697563670 hasRelatedWork W2375159187 @default.
• W2697563670 hasRelatedWork W2390961722 @default.

• next