FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2725006989> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2725006989 abstract "BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is associated with enormous personal and societal burdens, especially when it reaches the chronic stage of the disorder (pain for a duration of more than three months). Indeed, individuals who reach the chronic stage tend to show a more persistent course, and they account for the majority of social and economic costs. As a result, there is increasing emphasis on the importance of intervening at the early stages of LBP.According to the biopsychosocial model, LBP is a condition best understood with reference to an interaction of physical, psychological, and social influences. This has led to the development of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) programs that target factors from the different domains, administered by healthcare professionals from different backgrounds.This review is an update of a Cochrane Review on MBR for subacute LBP, which was published in 2003. It is part of a series of reviews on MBR for musculoskeletal pain published by the Cochrane Back and Neck Group and the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.ObjectivesTo examine the effectiveness of MBR for subacute LBP (pain for a duration of six to 12 weeks) among adults, with a focus on pain, back-specific disability, and work status.Search methodsWe searched for relevant trials in any language by a computer-aided search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and two trials registers. Our search is current to 13 July 2016.Selection criteriaWe included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults with subacute LBP. We included studies that investigated a MBR program compared to any type of control intervention. We defined MBR as an intervention that included a physical component (e.g. pharmacological, physical therapy) in combination with either a psychological, social, or occupational component (or any combination of these). We also required involvement of healthcare professionals from at least two different clinical backgrounds with appropriate training to deliver the component for which they were responsible.Data collection and analysisWe used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. In particular, the data extraction and 'risk of bias' assessment were conducted by two people, independently. We used the Cochrane tool to assess risk of bias and the GRADE approach to assess the overall quality of the evidence for each outcome.Main resultsWe included a total of nine RCTs (981 participants) in this review. Five studies were conducted in Europe and four in North America. Sample sizes ranged from 33 to 351. The mean age across trials ranged between 32.0 and 43.7 years.All included studies were judged as having high risk of performance bias and high risk of detection bias due to lack of blinding, and four of the nine studies suffered from at least one additional source of possible bias.In MBR compared to usual care for subacute LBP, individuals receiving MBR had less pain (four studies with 336 participants; SMD -0.46, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.21, moderate-quality of evidence due to risk of bias) and less disability (three studies with 240 participants; SMD -0.44, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.01, low-quality of evidence due to risk of bias and inconsistency), as well as increased likelihood of return-to-work (three studies with 170 participants; OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.46 to 6.98, very low-quality of evidence due to serious risk of bias and imprecision) and fewer sick leave days (two studies with 210 participants; SMD -0.38 95% CI -0.66 to -0.10, low-quality of evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision) at 12-month follow-up. The effect sizes for pain and disability were low in terms of clinical meaningfulness, whereas effects for work-related outcomes were in the moderate range.However, when comparing MBR to other treatments (i.e. brief intervention with features from a light mobilization program and a graded activity program, functional restoration, brief clinical intervention including education and advice on exercise, and psychological counselling), we found no differences between the groups in terms of pain (two studies with 336 participants; SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.07, low-quality evidence due to imprecision and risk of bias), functional disability (two studies with 345 participants; SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.18, low-quality evidence due to imprecision and risk of bias), and time away from work (two studies with 158 participants; SMD -0.25 95% CI -0.98 to 0.47, very low-quality evidence due to serious imprecision, inconsistency and risk of bias). Return-to-work was not reported in any of the studies.Although we looked for adverse events in both comparisons, none of the included studies reported this outcome.Authors' conclusionsOn average, people with subacute LBP who receive MBR will do better than if they receive usual care, but it is not clear whether they do better than people who receive some other type of treatment. However, the available research provides mainly low to very low-quality evidence, thus additional high-quality trials are needed before we can describe the value of MBP for clinical practice." @default.
• W2725006989 created "2017-07-14" @default.
• W2725006989 creator A5016088605 @default.
• W2725006989 creator A5018135109 @default.
• W2725006989 creator A5020536189 @default.
• W2725006989 creator A5051146403 @default.
• W2725006989 creator A5073853400 @default.
• W2725006989 creator A5086644637 @default.
• W2725006989 creator A5088020127 @default.
• W2725006989 creator A5090490801 @default.
• W2725006989 date "2017-06-28" @default.
• W2725006989 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2725006989 title "Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain" @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1010285967 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1247968195 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W140357810 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1507320532 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1550805440 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1782749242 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1969121058 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1970648960 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1976235513 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1977279891 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1977346380 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1981191956 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1988038060 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1989815215 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1992274723 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W1992896125 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2000040333 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2001562727 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2004005884 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2004457435 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2009994493 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2016573635 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2016941404 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2017022113 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2017605070 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2018805190 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2020708853 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2023370307 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2025636853 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2035870023 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2036178474 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2041385229 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2043004462 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2046195647 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2046559963 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2048060977 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2053924386 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2058095798 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2061002678 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2062039214 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2064856921 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2067463313 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2089574135 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2093671636 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2094466417 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2098082628 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2102514255 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2104969728 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2111416401 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2116144078 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2125208830 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2129322795 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2133853197 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2135356824 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2139747762 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2143656492 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2148390494 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2150640684 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2157229623 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2161162986 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2164124373 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2164675734 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2168900263 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2170012589 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2181316415 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2312763738 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2320054602 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2324199059 @default.
• W2725006989 cites W2332238265 @default.
• W2725006989 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002193.pub2" @default.
• W2725006989 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6481490" @default.
• W2725006989 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28656659" @default.
• W2725006989 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2725006989 type Work @default.
• W2725006989 sameAs 2725006989 @default.
• W2725006989 citedByCount "81" @default.
• W2725006989 countsByYear W27250069892017 @default.
• W2725006989 countsByYear W27250069892018 @default.
• W2725006989 countsByYear W27250069892019 @default.
• W2725006989 countsByYear W27250069892020 @default.
• W2725006989 countsByYear W27250069892021 @default.
• W2725006989 countsByYear W27250069892022 @default.
• W2725006989 countsByYear W27250069892023 @default.
• W2725006989 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2725006989 hasAuthorship W2725006989A5016088605 @default.
• W2725006989 hasAuthorship W2725006989A5018135109 @default.
• W2725006989 hasAuthorship W2725006989A5020536189 @default.

• next