Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2725766454> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 89 of
89
with 100 items per page.
- W2725766454 endingPage "78" @default.
- W2725766454 startingPage "70" @default.
- W2725766454 abstract "Objective Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is a standard radiotherapy technology for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), and bladder status is a common factor that affects dose distribution of the target and organs at risk (OARs). Under different bladder statuses, fusion dose distribution of IMRT combined with ICBT is unclear. The aim of the present study was to analyze the fusion dose distribution of targets and OARs for IMRT combined with ICBT in LACC under different bladder statuses. Methods A total of 20 patients with LACC who were treated in our department from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2015 underwent magnetic resonance imaging and simulation computed tomography (Sim-CT) scans under filled and empty bladder status. The magnetic resonance imaging and Sim-CT scans were transmitted by Sim-CT to the Oncentra treatment planning system and fused. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated in the magnetic resonance imaging, and the clinical target volume (CTV), planning target volume (PTV) and OARs (intestine, bladder, rectum, left, and right femoral head) were delineated in Sim-CT. The IMRT plan was designed with seven fields and 3-D ICBT in the treatment planning system, and the radiation sources were X-ray (6 MV) and 192Ir. The doses of the targets (D95%, D90%, D85%, D80%) and OARs (D1 cc and 2cc for intestine, D5%, 10%, and 30% for bladder, D1cc, 2cc, and 5cc for rectum, D1% for femoral head) were planned separately with IMRT and ICBT, and the geometric sum was used as the geometric dose. The treatment planning system plan used the superposition function to superimpose the IMRT and ICBT plans as a fusion plan, and the doses of the targets and OARs were calculated as a fusion dose. The relationship between the geometric and fusion doses of the targets and OARs was analyzed under different bladder statuses, and the dose contribution rates to the targets and OARs were calculated from ICBT. Results For the empty bladder: D95% (uGTV = 3.92, tCTV = 11.28, tPTV = 10.79), D90% (uGTV, CTV = 3.92, uPTV = 3.25), and D85% (u = 3.92), D80% (u = 3.92). The geometric doses of the targets were lower than the fusion doses. For the full bladder: D95% (uGTV, PTV = 3.92, tCTV = 15.96), D90% (uGTV = 3.81, uCTV, PTV = 3.92), D85% (u = 3.92), and D80% (uGTV = 4.70, uCTV, PTV = 3.92). The geometric doses of the targets (D95%, D90%, D85%, D80%) were lower than the fusion doses at P < 0.001. The dose difference rate of GTV under the filled bladder condition was lower than that of the empty bladder (0.17–0.93% and 0.32–1.07%, respectively), whereas these values were similar in the empty bladder condition for CTV and PTV (1.10–2.75% and 1.22–3.40%, and 0.98–2.29% and 0.94–3.17%, respectively). For the empty bladder, the geometric doses of OARs (uintestine = 3.92; tintestine = 11.59; ubladder=3.92, 3.92, 3.36; urectum = 3.92; tfemoral head = 4.77 and 6.06) were higher than the fusion doses. For the full bladder, the geometric doses of OARs (tintestine = 10.27 and 8.84; tbladder = 10.69, 11.77, and 4.91; urectum = 3.36, 3.21, and 3.25) were higher than the fusion doses at P < 0.005. The average geometric dose differences of D30% for the bladder and D1cc, 2cc, and 5cc for the rectum were higher than those of the fusion dose (1.90 Gy, 1.01 Gy, 0.87 Gy, 0.86 Gy and 1.86 Gy, 0.95 Gy, 0.79 Gy, 0.59 Gy). The D1% values for the right and left femoral head were 0.76 Gy, 0.41 Gy, 0.26 Gy, and 0.73 Gy. For the empty bladder: D95% (uGTV = 3.92, tCTV = 11.40, tPTV = 10.84), D90% (uGTV = 3.92, uCTV = 3.29, tPTV = 6.00), D85% (uGTV = 3.92, tCTV = 17.29, tPTV = 13.87), and D80% (uGTV = 3.92, tCTV = 16.60, tPTV = 15.41). The geometric dose contribution rate of ICBT to the targets was lower than that of the fusion dose; for the full bladder: D95% (uGTV = 9.87, uCTV = 15.78, uPTV = 10.65), D90% (uGTV = 3.81, tCTV = 20.70, tPTV = 17.64), D85% (tGTV = 8.31, tCTV = 23.27, tPTV = 19.78), D80% (tGTV = 4.68, uCTV = 3.92, tPTV = 19.90). The geometric dose contribution rate to the targets was lower than that of the fusion dose at P < 0.005. The highest dose contribution rate of ICBT was to GTV. The geometric and fusion contribution rates were 51.12–63.89% and 48.10–60.80%, and 49.52–63.35% and 46.74–60.52% under the empty and filled bladder conditions, respectively. These values were <10.00% for CTV and PTV. For the empty bladder, the geometric dose contribution rate of ICBT to OARs (uintestine = 3.92; ubladder = 3.92, 3.92, and 3.36; urectum = 3.92; tfemoral head = 4.67 and 6.16) was higher than that of fusion. For the filled bladder, the geometric dose contribution rate to OARs (tintestine = 10.14 and 8.77; tbladder = 10.74, 11.82, and 4.93; urectum = 3.25, 3.21, and 3.21) was higher than that of fusion at P < 0.005. Comparing the empty bladder with the filled bladder case, the dose contribution rates of ICBT to the rectum were 47.77–59.45% and 40.87–52.40%, and 47.82–58.78% and 41.61–52.00%, respectively, and the dose contribution rates to the bladder were 27.60–45.17% and 26.04–41.80%, and 23.36–43.67% and 21.89–40.22%, respectively. The dose contribution rates to the intestine were 30.90–36.90% and 28.85–34.79%, and 20.68–25.13% and 18.69–22.88%, respectively, with <10% to the femoral head." @default.
- W2725766454 created "2017-07-14" @default.
- W2725766454 creator A5006798969 @default.
- W2725766454 creator A5024276628 @default.
- W2725766454 creator A5032813285 @default.
- W2725766454 creator A5065157724 @default.
- W2725766454 creator A5071037763 @default.
- W2725766454 creator A5075024155 @default.
- W2725766454 date "2017-06-01" @default.
- W2725766454 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2725766454 title "Investigation of fusion dose distribution for locally advanced cervical cancer under different bladder statuses for intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with intracavitary brachytherapy" @default.
- W2725766454 cites W1118312066 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W1966087891 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W1977479761 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2045631021 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2065574271 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2082964723 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2085072478 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2132615517 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2142143971 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2142810471 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2155798732 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2160921883 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2166503791 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2214782882 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2237889244 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2283426173 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2334054605 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2339740514 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W2398625727 @default.
- W2725766454 cites W824967460 @default.
- W2725766454 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.15" @default.
- W2725766454 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2725766454 type Work @default.
- W2725766454 sameAs 2725766454 @default.
- W2725766454 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2725766454 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2725766454 hasAuthorship W2725766454A5006798969 @default.
- W2725766454 hasAuthorship W2725766454A5024276628 @default.
- W2725766454 hasAuthorship W2725766454A5032813285 @default.
- W2725766454 hasAuthorship W2725766454A5065157724 @default.
- W2725766454 hasAuthorship W2725766454A5071037763 @default.
- W2725766454 hasAuthorship W2725766454A5075024155 @default.
- W2725766454 hasBestOaLocation W27257664541 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C2777416452 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C2781074409 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C121608353 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C126322002 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C126838900 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C141071460 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C143409427 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C201645570 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C2777416452 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C2778220009 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C2781074409 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C2989005 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C509974204 @default.
- W2725766454 hasConceptScore W2725766454C71924100 @default.
- W2725766454 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2725766454 hasLocation W27257664541 @default.
- W2725766454 hasOpenAccess W2725766454 @default.
- W2725766454 hasPrimaryLocation W27257664541 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W2019388282 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W2054439487 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W2160921883 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W2971468854 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W3028896438 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W3031850683 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W3093971735 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W3094186661 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W3110899715 @default.
- W2725766454 hasRelatedWork W4283587651 @default.
- W2725766454 hasVolume "1" @default.
- W2725766454 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2725766454 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2725766454 magId "2725766454" @default.
- W2725766454 workType "article" @default.