Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2726093832> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2726093832 endingPage "70" @default.
- W2726093832 startingPage "63" @default.
- W2726093832 abstract "Abstract This paper examines attention checks and manipulation validations to detect inattentive respondents in primary empirical data collection. These prima facie attention checks range from the simple such as reverse scaling first proposed a century ago to more recent and involved methods such as evaluating response patterns and timed responses via online data capture tools. The attention check validations also range from easily implemented mechanisms such as automatic detection through directed queries to highly intensive investigation of responses by the researcher. The latter has the potential to introduce inadvertent researcher bias as the researcher's judgment may impact the interpretation of the data. The empirical findings of the present work reveal that construct and scale validations show consistently significant improvement in the fit statistics—a finding of great use for researchers working predominantly with scales and constructs for their empirical models. However, based on the rudimentary experimental models employed in the analysis, attention checks generally do not show a consistent, systematic improvement in the significance of test statistics for experimental manipulations. This latter result indicates that, by their very nature, attention checks may trigger an inherent trade‐off between loss of sample subjects—lowered power and increased Type II error—and the potential of capitalizing on chance alone—the possibility that the previously significant results were in fact the result of Type I error. The analysis also shows that the attrition rates due to attention checks—upwards of 70% in some observed samples—are far larger than typically assumed. Such loss rates raise the specter that studies not validating attention may inadvertently increase their Type I error rate. The manuscript provides general guidelines for various attention checks, discusses the psychological nuances of the methods, and highlights the delicate balance among incentive alignment, monetary compensation, and the subsequently triggered mood of respondents." @default.
- W2726093832 created "2017-07-14" @default.
- W2726093832 creator A5014746474 @default.
- W2726093832 creator A5025816935 @default.
- W2726093832 date "2017-07-05" @default.
- W2726093832 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2726093832 title "Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality" @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1649236539 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1749243362 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1964015985 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1970864855 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1971669205 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1972958769 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1975450585 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1976844275 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1986780616 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1989421368 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1995982471 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1997402591 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W1998143213 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2006270886 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2015441835 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2026510909 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2031576108 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2059824510 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2066884210 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2068509181 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2075742573 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2076387137 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2080211902 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2087442202 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2088363142 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2088476684 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2090530579 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2097263128 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2104470097 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2105395611 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2106568252 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2111375250 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2116323796 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2117773457 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2118356485 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2119175660 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2119298903 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2121865868 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2122983118 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2125037695 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2130521490 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2130995195 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2139786717 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2141708418 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2143155902 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2143600769 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2156616450 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2157461297 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2168112513 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2171431746 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2312661320 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2465520244 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W2512680836 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W3124136503 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W3125283999 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W4210996962 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W4229716956 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W4231865728 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W4242883546 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W4253633548 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W4296586256 @default.
- W2726093832 cites W4319053964 @default.
- W2726093832 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.06.001" @default.
- W2726093832 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2726093832 type Work @default.
- W2726093832 sameAs 2726093832 @default.
- W2726093832 citedByCount "204" @default.
- W2726093832 countsByYear W27260938322017 @default.
- W2726093832 countsByYear W27260938322018 @default.
- W2726093832 countsByYear W27260938322019 @default.
- W2726093832 countsByYear W27260938322020 @default.
- W2726093832 countsByYear W27260938322021 @default.
- W2726093832 countsByYear W27260938322022 @default.
- W2726093832 countsByYear W27260938322023 @default.
- W2726093832 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2726093832 hasAuthorship W2726093832A5014746474 @default.
- W2726093832 hasAuthorship W2726093832A5025816935 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C159717818 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C176217482 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2726093832 hasConcept C192562407 @default.