FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2726177599> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2726177599 endingPage "1059" @default.
• W2726177599 startingPage "1051" @default.
• W2726177599 abstract "The objective was to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility, logistics, and potential effect of monthly provider funnel plot feedback reports from Press Ganey data and semiannual face-to-face coaching sessions to improve patient satisfaction scores.This was a pilot randomized controlled trial of 25 emergency medicine faculty providers in one urban academic emergency department. We enrolled full-time clinical faculty with at least 12 months of baseline Press Ganey data, who anticipated working in the ED for at least 12 additional months. Providers were randomized into intervention or control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group had an initial 20-minute meeting to introduce the funnel plot feedback tool and standardized feedback based on their baseline Press Ganey scores and then received a monthly e-mail with their individualized funnel plot depicting cumulative Press Ganey scores (compared to their baseline score and the mean score of all providers) for 12 months. The primary outcome was the difference in Press Ganey doctor-overall scores between treatment groups at 12 months. We used a weighted analysis of covariance model to analyze the study groups, accounting for variation in the number of surveys by provider and baseline scores.Of 36 eligible faculty, we enrolled 25 providers, 13 of whom were randomized to the intervention group and 12 to the control group. During the study period, there were 815 Press Ganey surveys returned, ranging from four to 71 surveys per provider. For the standardized overall doctor score over 12 months (primary outcome), there was no difference between the intervention and control groups (difference = 1.3 points, 95% confidence interval = -2.4 to 5.9, p = 0.47). Similarly, there was no difference between groups when evaluating the four categories of doctor-specific patient satisfaction scores from the Press Ganey survey (all p > 0.05).In this pilot trial of monthly provider funnel plot Press Ganey feedback reports, there was no difference in patient satisfaction scores between the intervention and control groups after 12 months. While this study was not powered to detect outcome differences, we demonstrate the feasibility, logistics, and effect sizes that could be used to inform future definitive trials." @default.
• W2726177599 created "2017-07-14" @default.
• W2726177599 creator A5001137551 @default.
• W2726177599 creator A5001577841 @default.
• W2726177599 creator A5011629864 @default.
• W2726177599 creator A5014867872 @default.
• W2726177599 creator A5022516509 @default.
• W2726177599 creator A5023972779 @default.
• W2726177599 creator A5046361048 @default.
• W2726177599 date "2017-08-16" @default.
• W2726177599 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2726177599 title "Using Press Ganey Provider Feedback to Improve Patient Satisfaction: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial" @default.
• W2726177599 cites W1557229620 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W1581308462 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W1603992180 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W1986273094 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2001380437 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2014737269 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2031142673 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2032242065 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2043458654 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2097386058 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2111003946 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2112323020 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2140735925 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2263753094 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2335084474 @default.
• W2726177599 cites W2498299989 @default.
• W2726177599 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13248" @default.
• W2726177599 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28662281" @default.
• W2726177599 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2726177599 type Work @default.
• W2726177599 sameAs 2726177599 @default.
• W2726177599 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2726177599 countsByYear W27261775992018 @default.
• W2726177599 countsByYear W27261775992019 @default.
• W2726177599 countsByYear W27261775992020 @default.
• W2726177599 countsByYear W27261775992021 @default.
• W2726177599 countsByYear W27261775992022 @default.
• W2726177599 countsByYear W27261775992023 @default.
• W2726177599 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2726177599 hasAuthorship W2726177599A5001137551 @default.
• W2726177599 hasAuthorship W2726177599A5001577841 @default.
• W2726177599 hasAuthorship W2726177599A5011629864 @default.
• W2726177599 hasAuthorship W2726177599A5014867872 @default.
• W2726177599 hasAuthorship W2726177599A5022516509 @default.
• W2726177599 hasAuthorship W2726177599A5023972779 @default.
• W2726177599 hasAuthorship W2726177599A5046361048 @default.
• W2726177599 hasBestOaLocation W27261775991 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C100480397 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C2779363792 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C2780439572 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C82605166 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C100480397 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C126322002 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C141071460 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C15744967 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C159110408 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C168563851 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C1862650 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C2775944032 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C2779363792 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C2780439572 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C2780724011 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C512399662 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C542102704 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C71924100 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C82605166 @default.
• W2726177599 hasConceptScore W2726177599C95190672 @default.
• W2726177599 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2726177599 hasLocation W27261775991 @default.
• W2726177599 hasLocation W27261775992 @default.
• W2726177599 hasOpenAccess W2726177599 @default.
• W2726177599 hasPrimaryLocation W27261775991 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W1965714957 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W2028896626 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W2081596325 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W2352724920 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W2726177599 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W2964451757 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W3003268422 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W3022674208 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W3150078158 @default.
• W2726177599 hasRelatedWork W4285612597 @default.
• W2726177599 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W2726177599 isParatext "false" @default.

• next