FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2734058321> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2734058321 abstract "The degree to which item review on a computerized adaptive test (CAT) could be used by examinees to inflate their scores artificially was studied. G. G. Kingsbury (1996) described a strategy in which examinees could use the changes in item difficulty during a CAT to determine which items' answers are incorrect and should be changed during item review. In CAT, a correctly answered item will typically be followed by a more difficult item, while an incorrectly answered item will typically be followed by an easier item. The results of two studies involving groups of 77 and 62 undergraduates suggest that examinees are not highly proficient at discriminating item difficulty, a skill needed for successful application of the Kingsbury strategy. In the third study, which used 243 introductory statistics students, the Kingsbury strategy, which examinees would use only for guessed items, was compared to a generalized strategy used for all sequential item pairs. The Kingsbury strategy yielded a small average score gain, while the generalized strategy yielded an average score loss. These results suggest that only the Kingsbury strategy would enable examinees to inflate their scores successfully. (Contains 2 tables, 3 figures, and 14 references.) (Author/SLD) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDU ATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) The Accuracy of Examinee Judgments of Relative Item Difficulty: Implications for Computerized Adaptive Testing Steven L. Wise, Sharon A. Freeman, Sara J. Finney, Craig K. Enders, and Donald D. Severance University of Nebraska-Lincoln Paper presented at the 1997 annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL" @default.
• W2734058321 created "2017-07-14" @default.
• W2734058321 creator A5009654288 @default.
• W2734058321 date "1997-03-01" @default.
• W2734058321 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2734058321 title "The Accuracy of Examinee Judgments of Relative Item Difficulty: Implications for Computerized Adaptive Testing." @default.
• W2734058321 cites W2163329495 @default.
• W2734058321 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W2734058321 type Work @default.
• W2734058321 sameAs 2734058321 @default.
• W2734058321 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2734058321 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2734058321 hasAuthorship W2734058321A5009654288 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C144352353 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C19875794 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C105795698 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C111472728 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C138496976 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C138885662 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C144352353 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C151730666 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C15744967 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C171606756 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C19875794 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C2777267654 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C2779530757 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C33923547 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C41008148 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C77805123 @default.
• W2734058321 hasConceptScore W2734058321C86803240 @default.
• W2734058321 hasLocation W27340583211 @default.
• W2734058321 hasOpenAccess W2734058321 @default.
• W2734058321 hasPrimaryLocation W27340583211 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W1999406498 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2034314552 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2043287354 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2047203693 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2070982494 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2073706349 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2080239122 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2103179439 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2164841925 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2590084252 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2724966151 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2725053548 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2732222243 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2754267992 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W2777247254 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W3166196589 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W321842598 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W329373293 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W78975844 @default.
• W2734058321 hasRelatedWork W91211450 @default.
• W2734058321 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2734058321 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2734058321 magId "2734058321" @default.
• W2734058321 workType "article" @default.