Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2735587071> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2735587071 abstract "Reports serve as a bridge between laboratories and clinicians, help synthesize an overwhelming amount of raw data into evidence-based medicine, and play a significant role in designing clinical treatments. In an effort to guarantee high-quality epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation testing and reporting performance, the National Center for Clinical Laboratories launched a proficiency testing (PT) scheme reflecting clinical practices in China since 2014. This study focuses on the quality assessment of gene mutation reports.Fifty-three laboratories that submitted reports in both 2014 and 2016 EGFR gene mutation PT schemes were selected for report analysis and comparison according to predefined evaluation criteria.The average score for reports from 2014 was 14 out of 30 points. The overall scores for reports from 2016 improved substantially, yielding an average score of 20 out of 30 points. Among the evaluation criteria, general items were well documented in the reports. However, items specific to molecular diagnosis were far from satisfactory, and some items were even missing.The quality assessment of clinical written reports from 2014 and 2016 demonstrates that substantial improvements have been made in overall reporting performance. However, not all statements pertaining to important elements met expectations. To continue education, repeated PT schemes need to be executed in a timely fashion to expose and address existing shortcomings in clinical reports. There remains ample room for improvement towards generating concise, comprehensive, and readable reports.This article compares the quality of clinical gene mutation reports submitted in 2014 to those submitted in 2016 epidermal growth factor receptor proficiency testing schemes, exposes the existing shortcomings, and discusses ways to communicate results more effectively in the future. The findings demonstrate that notable progress was observed in the overall reporting performance. However, key points specific to molecular diagnosis were far from expectation, and some items were even missing. Standardization needs to be emphasized to improve the report format and content. This article provides a reference that laboratories can use to write concise, comprehensive, and readily accessible clinical reports." @default.
- W2735587071 created "2017-07-21" @default.
- W2735587071 creator A5004708289 @default.
- W2735587071 creator A5026449732 @default.
- W2735587071 creator A5038934949 @default.
- W2735587071 creator A5065037360 @default.
- W2735587071 creator A5069880463 @default.
- W2735587071 creator A5076403164 @default.
- W2735587071 date "2017-07-12" @default.
- W2735587071 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2735587071 title "Quality Assessment of Reporting Performance for EGFR Molecular Diagnosis in Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer" @default.
- W2735587071 cites W130015249 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W1970433797 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W1986034271 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2019130956 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2034507671 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2043696829 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2054841768 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2062629045 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2101478267 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2104962676 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2105022277 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2115418062 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2118272646 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2121456155 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2131589647 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2150013445 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2153655235 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2158667695 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2226969643 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2229116738 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2279539442 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2309021002 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2403654892 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2409577054 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2468543693 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2557713867 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2560641280 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W2590920559 @default.
- W2735587071 cites W4234236664 @default.
- W2735587071 doi "https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0042" @default.
- W2735587071 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5679822" @default.
- W2735587071 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28701573" @default.
- W2735587071 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2735587071 type Work @default.
- W2735587071 sameAs 2735587071 @default.
- W2735587071 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2735587071 countsByYear W27355870712019 @default.
- W2735587071 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2735587071 hasAuthorship W2735587071A5004708289 @default.
- W2735587071 hasAuthorship W2735587071A5026449732 @default.
- W2735587071 hasAuthorship W2735587071A5038934949 @default.
- W2735587071 hasAuthorship W2735587071A5065037360 @default.
- W2735587071 hasAuthorship W2735587071A5069880463 @default.
- W2735587071 hasAuthorship W2735587071A5076403164 @default.
- W2735587071 hasBestOaLocation W27355870711 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C2779438470 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C2994225774 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C501734568 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C104317684 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C111472728 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C121608353 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C126322002 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C138885662 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C143998085 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C19527891 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C2776256026 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C2779438470 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C2779530757 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C2994225774 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C501734568 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C54355233 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C71924100 @default.
- W2735587071 hasConceptScore W2735587071C86803240 @default.
- W2735587071 hasLocation W27355870711 @default.
- W2735587071 hasLocation W27355870712 @default.
- W2735587071 hasLocation W27355870713 @default.
- W2735587071 hasOpenAccess W2735587071 @default.
- W2735587071 hasPrimaryLocation W27355870711 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W1546009185 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W229395420 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W2355573293 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W2406967196 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W2411913435 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W2506841305 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W3012945969 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W3152416472 @default.
- W2735587071 hasRelatedWork W3162384365 @default.