FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2742249516> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2742249516 abstract "The set of papers in this issue of Journal of Teacher Education (JTE) is particularly timely, as it represents research that speaks directly to current issues of importance to diverse teacher education stakeholders. These stakeholders include, among others, university leaders, teacher educators, teacher preparation and professional development program designers, and policy makers. These papers touch on policies and practices intended to increase the quality of the teaching force, presenting evidence and analyses and highlighting the consequences of decisions about the design of systems for initial and continuing education of teachers. The collection is also significant in spanning the continuum of issues in teacher education, from assessments used for admission and graduation, to the nature and quality of professional support for beginning and experienced educators. The papers also represent a range of methodological approaches--quantitative, qualitative, and conceptual. In this editorial, we will consider the highlights and significance of each of these papers in turn. Evaluation of the quality of teacher preparation programs has long been an important policy topic. The United States, along with many other countries, has multiple systems for evaluating programs, with varying purposes, methods, and audiences (Feuer, Floden, Chudowsky, & Ahn, 2013). National systems of program accreditation have gained prominence, especially as many states have begun to require national accreditation. As two competing systems merged to form the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP), a new set of standards were established. Key questions for policy and practice are what these standards should be and what evidence supports them. For the new CAEP standards, much debate has focused on what admission requirements should be for educator preparation programs. On its face, it seems reasonable to insist that programs restrict entry to those students likely to become high-quality teachers. An unintended consequence of using measures such as scores on college entry exams, however, may be the disproportionate effect on minority-serving institutions of higher education and the reduction in the numbers of graduates of color, just as the nation is calling for more teachers from underrepresented groups. Decisions about whether high entrance standards are, on balance, desirable should be informed by evidence on whether meeting such an entrance requirement is indeed necessary for becoming a high-quality teacher. Program representatives might also argue that, when they admit students with low college entry exam scores, they recognize that they will need to address weaknesses in content knowledge, and that they are committed to removing such weaknesses before recommending candidates for certification. What would be the problem, they might say, with admitting students with low entry scores, provided that they ensure that they have the necessary knowledge and skills before they are certified? The paper by Evans in this issue of the journal provides evidence to inform this debate about the CAEP standard concerning admissions requirements. Her paper addresses the degree to which measures used in making admissions decisions are predictive of prospective teachers' success, finding little evidence for some measures, but moderate predictive power for graduate grade point average (GPA). Another of her analyses reveals that setting high admission standards would have significant impact on enrollments in minority-serving programs, raising critical questions about their longterm sustainability. Current demands in the field require attention not only to program admission requirements but also to assessments candidates must undergo at the end of their program. The recent move toward performance assessments as uniform exit requirements has the potential to shift priorities away from what teachers know on paper-and-pencil licensure exams toward how they enact practices in context. …" @default.
• W2742249516 created "2017-08-17" @default.
• W2742249516 creator A5010320848 @default.
• W2742249516 creator A5072823052 @default.
• W2742249516 creator A5078992923 @default.
• W2742249516 creator A5079137114 @default.
• W2742249516 date "2017-08-09" @default.
• W2742249516 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2742249516 title "How Teacher Education Can Elevate Teacher Quality: Evidence From Research" @default.
• W2742249516 cites W2091617221 @default.
• W2742249516 cites W2114538368 @default.
• W2742249516 cites W597333101 @default.
• W2742249516 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117721190" @default.
• W2742249516 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2742249516 type Work @default.
• W2742249516 sameAs 2742249516 @default.
• W2742249516 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2742249516 countsByYear W27422495162018 @default.
• W2742249516 countsByYear W27422495162019 @default.
• W2742249516 countsByYear W27422495162020 @default.
• W2742249516 countsByYear W27422495162021 @default.
• W2742249516 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2742249516 hasAuthorship W2742249516A5010320848 @default.
• W2742249516 hasAuthorship W2742249516A5072823052 @default.
• W2742249516 hasAuthorship W2742249516A5078992923 @default.
• W2742249516 hasAuthorship W2742249516A5079137114 @default.
• W2742249516 hasBestOaLocation W27422495161 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C2779529714 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C2780805685 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C51067260 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C111472728 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C127413603 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C138885662 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C144024400 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C15744967 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C177264268 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C17744445 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C19417346 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C199360897 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C2779529714 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C2779530757 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C2780805685 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C39549134 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C41008148 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C509550671 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C51067260 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C55587333 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C61521584 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C71924100 @default.
• W2742249516 hasConceptScore W2742249516C78519656 @default.
• W2742249516 hasLocation W27422495161 @default.
• W2742249516 hasOpenAccess W2742249516 @default.
• W2742249516 hasPrimaryLocation W27422495161 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W101203720 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W10932805 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W1574863886 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W1625793092 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W1976784900 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W1995964340 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W2001714540 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W2006828808 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W204009192 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W2091860847 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W2093342515 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W213253550 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W2164748309 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W2287814761 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W2562330328 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W287648077 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W291441151 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W314592579 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W327871085 @default.
• W2742249516 hasRelatedWork W98609170 @default.
• W2742249516 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2742249516 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2742249516 magId "2742249516" @default.
• W2742249516 workType "article" @default.