FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2742308863> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2742308863 endingPage "655" @default.
• W2742308863 startingPage "647" @default.
• W2742308863 abstract "Purpose To estimate the clinical and functional results of patients who underwent distinctive types of neck dissection, with particular emphasis on shoulder function, rate of recurrence, and quality of life in patients with N0 neck. Materials and Methods A randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 2014 to March 2017 in which 20 adult patients with T1 to T3 lesions of the oral cavity and N0 neck were included. Patients were randomly allocated to group I (n = 10; selective neck dissection) or group II (n = 10; superselective neck dissection). All patients were evaluated objectively for degree of arm abduction and subjectively for quality of life using a questionnaire completed pre- and postoperatively at 6 months. Also, locoregional recurrence was investigated for 2.5 years. Data were scrutinized by applying mean and standard deviation, unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kaplan-Meier test. Results Mean values of the Arm Abduction Test and quality-of-life scores were statistically significant (P < .05) for group II compared with group I at all intervals. Data analyzed for locoregional recurrence showed a statistically significant difference between groups (P < .05), with group II having the better outcome. Conclusion The results showed less shoulder morbidity and improved quality of life for superselective neck dissection (group II) compared with selective neck dissection (group I). Furthermore, group II was better for locoregional recurrence, which determines the oncologic safety of the procedure. To estimate the clinical and functional results of patients who underwent distinctive types of neck dissection, with particular emphasis on shoulder function, rate of recurrence, and quality of life in patients with N0 neck. A randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 2014 to March 2017 in which 20 adult patients with T1 to T3 lesions of the oral cavity and N0 neck were included. Patients were randomly allocated to group I (n = 10; selective neck dissection) or group II (n = 10; superselective neck dissection). All patients were evaluated objectively for degree of arm abduction and subjectively for quality of life using a questionnaire completed pre- and postoperatively at 6 months. Also, locoregional recurrence was investigated for 2.5 years. Data were scrutinized by applying mean and standard deviation, unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kaplan-Meier test. Mean values of the Arm Abduction Test and quality-of-life scores were statistically significant (P < .05) for group II compared with group I at all intervals. Data analyzed for locoregional recurrence showed a statistically significant difference between groups (P < .05), with group II having the better outcome. The results showed less shoulder morbidity and improved quality of life for superselective neck dissection (group II) compared with selective neck dissection (group I). Furthermore, group II was better for locoregional recurrence, which determines the oncologic safety of the procedure." @default.
• W2742308863 created "2017-08-17" @default.
• W2742308863 creator A5000759693 @default.
• W2742308863 creator A5002658844 @default.
• W2742308863 creator A5015824550 @default.
• W2742308863 creator A5019541734 @default.
• W2742308863 creator A5049659945 @default.
• W2742308863 creator A5055764984 @default.
• W2742308863 creator A5091369553 @default.
• W2742308863 date "2018-03-01" @default.
• W2742308863 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2742308863 title "Is Superselective Neck Dissection Safer Than Supraomohyoid Neck Dissection for Oral Carcinoma Patients With N0 Neck in Terms of Shoulder Morbidity and Recurrence Rate?" @default.
• W2742308863 cites W1991320157 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W1992819000 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W1995286750 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2000089041 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2005439491 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2020486940 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2033090842 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2041210039 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2041596555 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2043207240 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2052566213 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2059042376 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2075683400 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2097410162 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2101342177 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2101536010 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2102502520 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2104223819 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2127350532 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2159041683 @default.
• W2742308863 cites W2167458670 @default.
• W2742308863 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.002" @default.
• W2742308863 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28863886" @default.
• W2742308863 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2742308863 type Work @default.
• W2742308863 sameAs 2742308863 @default.
• W2742308863 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2742308863 countsByYear W27423088632018 @default.
• W2742308863 countsByYear W27423088632019 @default.
• W2742308863 countsByYear W27423088632020 @default.
• W2742308863 countsByYear W27423088632023 @default.
• W2742308863 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2742308863 hasAuthorship W2742308863A5000759693 @default.
• W2742308863 hasAuthorship W2742308863A5002658844 @default.
• W2742308863 hasAuthorship W2742308863A5015824550 @default.
• W2742308863 hasAuthorship W2742308863A5019541734 @default.
• W2742308863 hasAuthorship W2742308863A5049659945 @default.
• W2742308863 hasAuthorship W2742308863A5055764984 @default.
• W2742308863 hasAuthorship W2742308863A5091369553 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C12868164 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C2777546739 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C2778474501 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C126322002 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C12868164 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C141071460 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C159110408 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C2775862295 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C2777546739 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C2778474501 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C2779951463 @default.
• W2742308863 hasConceptScore W2742308863C71924100 @default.
• W2742308863 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2742308863 hasLocation W27423088631 @default.
• W2742308863 hasLocation W27423088632 @default.
• W2742308863 hasOpenAccess W2742308863 @default.
• W2742308863 hasPrimaryLocation W27423088631 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W1970087478 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W1982280801 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W2014442674 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W2051049232 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W2153993241 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W2388383430 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W2409190221 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W2810360808 @default.
• W2742308863 hasRelatedWork W4249397197 @default.
• W2742308863 hasVolume "76" @default.
• W2742308863 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2742308863 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2742308863 magId "2742308863" @default.
• W2742308863 workType "article" @default.