FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2742586944> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2742586944 endingPage "599" @default.
• W2742586944 startingPage "593" @default.
• W2742586944 abstract "Statement of problem Achieving natural tooth appearance with sufficient mechanical strength is one of the most challenging issues of computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials. However, limited evidence is available regarding their optical and mechanical properties for proper and evidence-based material selection in clinical practice. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the translucency and biaxial flexural strength of 5 monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. Material and methods Disk-shaped specimens (n=30) of each material (Lava Ultimate [LU], Vita Enamic [VE], Vitablocs Mark II [VMII], Vita Suprinity [VS], and IPS e.max CAD [IPS]) with a diameter of 12 mm and a thickness of 1.2 ±0.05 mm were prepared. A spectrophotometer was used to measure the translucency parameter. The specimens were then subjected to a biaxial flexure test using 3 balls and loaded with a piston in a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure occurred (International Organization for Standardization standard 6872). Weibull statistics were used to evaluate the characteristic strength and reliability of each material. Chemical compositions were analyzed using an energy dispersive spectrometer, and microstructural analysis was conducted using scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey honest significant difference test (α=.05). Results Significant differences were found among the materials concerning translucency and biaxial flexural strength (P<.05). The highest mean transparency value was obtained in the VS group, whereas the lowest mean value was obtained in the VE group. The VS group produced the highest mean biaxial flexural strength, followed by the IPS, LU, VE, and VMII groups. Conclusions Based on the results of the present study, zirconia-reinforced glass-ceramic revealed higher mean translucency and biaxial flexural strength than resin nanoceramic, feldspathic ceramic, lithium disilicate ceramic, and dual-network ceramic." @default.
• W2742586944 created "2017-08-17" @default.
• W2742586944 creator A5024676055 @default.
• W2742586944 creator A5051233583 @default.
• W2742586944 date "2018-04-01" @default.
• W2742586944 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2742586944 title "Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials" @default.
• W2742586944 cites W1907627167 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W1966825451 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W1976666805 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W1983972908 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W1984715332 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W1987159371 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W1996295204 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2008708022 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2028311616 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2029195285 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2031554507 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2047145721 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2049398694 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2055131140 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2071593176 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2094161018 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2108752214 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2112800198 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2122030185 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2123041698 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2127858708 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2153158909 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2166359730 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2175809189 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2341383816 @default.
• W2742586944 cites W2552408660 @default.
• W2742586944 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.012" @default.
• W2742586944 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28781072" @default.
• W2742586944 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2742586944 type Work @default.
• W2742586944 sameAs 2742586944 @default.
• W2742586944 citedByCount "136" @default.
• W2742586944 countsByYear W27425869442018 @default.
• W2742586944 countsByYear W27425869442019 @default.
• W2742586944 countsByYear W27425869442020 @default.
• W2742586944 countsByYear W27425869442021 @default.
• W2742586944 countsByYear W27425869442022 @default.
• W2742586944 countsByYear W27425869442023 @default.
• W2742586944 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2742586944 hasAuthorship W2742586944A5024676055 @default.
• W2742586944 hasAuthorship W2742586944A5051233583 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConcept C178405089 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConceptScore W2742586944C112950240 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConceptScore W2742586944C159985019 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConceptScore W2742586944C178405089 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConceptScore W2742586944C180478085 @default.
• W2742586944 hasConceptScore W2742586944C192562407 @default.
• W2742586944 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2742586944 hasLocation W27425869441 @default.
• W2742586944 hasLocation W27425869442 @default.
• W2742586944 hasOpenAccess W2742586944 @default.
• W2742586944 hasPrimaryLocation W27425869441 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W1576741437 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W2084610597 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W2737498735 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W2810358961 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W2898370298 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W3131825152 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W4221032064 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W4310350770 @default.
• W2742586944 hasRelatedWork W4316686802 @default.
• W2742586944 hasVolume "119" @default.
• W2742586944 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2742586944 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2742586944 magId "2742586944" @default.
• W2742586944 workType "article" @default.