FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2742954735> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2742954735 abstract "Contrary to popular belief, Congress and the President, in vetoing a that they object to under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), may not forever bar the issuing agency from regulating in the area of law addressed by the rule. This is because the courts should foreclose such an outcome by interpreting the CRA in a non-restrictive manner for agencies. At the same time, however, the courts should refrain from granting deference to agency interpretations of the CRA. They should however, give some deference to agencies under the arbitrary and capricious standard of review. This approach reflects a proper understanding of the relative scope of legislative, judicial, and executive power and responsibility. Specifically, the courts may assert judicial review over rules that are alleged to be out of compliance with the CRA because asserting judicial review is consistent with the language of the statute, its legislative history and the presumption in favor of judicial review of agency action. This is true despite the fact that the majority of courts have held that the language of the CRA precludes judicial review. In addition to being able to assert judicial review, the courts have the authority under Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution to decide how to interpret substantially the same, regardless of concerns that doing so would be an unconstitutional exercise of excessively delegated authority by Congress. This makes ripe the issue of how to interpret substantially the same. The literature has formulated a hierarchy of plausible interpretations that a court could adopt, starting from the least stringent to the most restrictive of interpretations (from the perspective of federal agencies). One of the interpretations advocated for in the literature, which states that a re-issued need only be altered so as to have significantly greater benefits and/or significantly lower costs than the original rule to not be substantially the same, is a generally valid approach. Upon testing the validity of the cost-benefit approach in other contexts, it is clear that this approach is reasonable in most (but not all) scenarios. In addition, the courts, in adopting a cost-benefit interpretation of substantially the same, should do so de novo and decline to grant Chevron deference to agencies on the issue. This is because the CRA is not an agency-specific statute, so deferring here would create a lack of uniformity on this issue of great economic and political importance without any meaningful judicial input. Finally, for pragmatic reasons, the courts should apply the deferential arbitrary and capricious standard of review to an agency's conclusions regarding the relative costs and benefits between its re-issued and original rules, despite concerns that deferring may undermine the CRA's purpose of holding agencies accountable. This overall approach reflects a proper understanding of the scope of legislative, executive and judicial authority under our system of separated powers." @default.
• W2742954735 created "2017-08-17" @default.
• W2742954735 creator A5029883057 @default.
• W2742954735 date "2017-07-26" @default.
• W2742954735 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2742954735 title "Interpreting the Congressional Review Act: Why the Courts Should Assert Judicial Review, Narrowly Construe 'Substantially the Same,' and Decline to Defer to Agencies Under Chevron" @default.
• W2742954735 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2742954735 type Work @default.
• W2742954735 sameAs 2742954735 @default.
• W2742954735 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2742954735 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2742954735 hasAuthorship W2742954735A5029883057 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C100505606 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C171460291 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C2777553895 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C2780114137 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C2780253743 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C2780597233 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C48764862 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C58583792 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C79638320 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C81819989 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C100505606 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C108170787 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C144024400 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C171460291 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C17319257 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C17744445 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C199539241 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C2776154427 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C2777553895 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C2778272461 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C2780114137 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C2780253743 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C2780597233 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C36289849 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C48764862 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C58583792 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C79638320 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C81819989 @default.
• W2742954735 hasConceptScore W2742954735C83009810 @default.
• W2742954735 hasLocation W27429547351 @default.
• W2742954735 hasOpenAccess W2742954735 @default.
• W2742954735 hasPrimaryLocation W27429547351 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W1516067229 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W2139557785 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W2199747314 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W2259629411 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W2286686465 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W2532015927 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W269551595 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W2797140109 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W2890625859 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W298611594 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W299699303 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W3122550139 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W3123652328 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W3123865852 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W3123896741 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W3186601938 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W32484645 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W95950226 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W3124665506 @default.
• W2742954735 hasRelatedWork W3124916341 @default.
• W2742954735 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2742954735 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2742954735 magId "2742954735" @default.
• W2742954735 workType "article" @default.