FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2743164196> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2743164196 endingPage "32" @default.
• W2743164196 startingPage "32" @default.
• W2743164196 abstract "The different models for the criminal liability of juristic persons reveal a tension between individualist and realistic approaches. For individualists a corporation is the product of a union of individuals. This means that a juristic person can only be held criminally responsible if the conduct and fault of an individual involved in the entity are attributed to the juristic person. For realists a corporate entity has an existence independent of its individual members. The juristic person is blameworthy because its corporate identity or corporate ethos encouraged the criminal conduct. A study of organisational theory reveals that corporate crime may not necessarily be traced to the fault of specific individuals. Corporate criminality often is the result of complex decisions on different levels of the corporate hierarchy and furthermore is encouraged by the manner in which the organisation is structured. Prominent scholars such as the American philosopher Peter A French and the Australian Brent Fisse rejected an individualist approach and attempted to develop models of corporate fault based on the corporate identity idea. The failure of a corporation to take preventative or corrective measures in reaction to corporate criminal conduct is regarded as the basis for corporate fault by these authors. French calls this the principle of responsive adjustment whilst Fisse names it the concept of reactive fault. A more sophisticated model (the corporate ethos model), which is also more reconcilable with the basic notions of criminal law, was developed by the American legal scholar Pamela Bucy. * A corporation will be held criminally responsible if its corporate ethos has encouraged the criminal conduct. The corporate ethos can be established with reference to numerous factors such as the corporate hierarchy, corporate goals, the existing monitoring and compliance systems and the question whether employees are rewarded or indemnified for inappropriate behavior.* Pieter du Toit, B Iuris LLB (UOVS) LLM (UJ). Senior Lektor, Fakulteit Regte Noordwes-Universiteit. pieter.dutoit@nwu.ac.za. Hierdie by[1]drae is gedeeltelik gebaseer op dié skrywer se proefskrif getiteld Die strafregtelike aanspreeklikheid van en straftoemeting aan regspersone (LLD-proefskrif NWU 2010).** Gerrit Pienaar, B Jur et Com LLB LLD (PU vir CHO). Professor, Fakulteit Regte Noordwes-Universiteit. gerrit.pienaar@nwu.ac.za." @default.
• W2743164196 created "2017-08-17" @default.
• W2743164196 creator A5032812635 @default.
• W2743164196 creator A5064542290 @default.
• W2743164196 date "2017-06-06" @default.
• W2743164196 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2743164196 title "Korporatiewe Identiteit as Grondslag van die Strafregtelike Aanspreeklikheid van Regspersone (1): Teoretiese Grondbeginsels" @default.
• W2743164196 cites W1489839561 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W1522207819 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W1587664487 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W1908640748 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W1965071653 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2001326204 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2041753502 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2043822089 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2051123265 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2059396148 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2070486452 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2089794728 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2112383134 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2122689397 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2124823754 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2162219598 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W217299224 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2230629261 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2324595903 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2329167548 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2479191587 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W25065617 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2795403614 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2796886857 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2805765791 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W287261812 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W2990020340 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W3008516227 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W3122423150 @default.
• W2743164196 cites W582402015 @default.
• W2743164196 doi "https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i1a2544" @default.
• W2743164196 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2743164196 type Work @default.
• W2743164196 sameAs 2743164196 @default.
• W2743164196 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2743164196 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2743164196 hasAuthorship W2743164196A5032812635 @default.
• W2743164196 hasAuthorship W2743164196A5064542290 @default.
• W2743164196 hasBestOaLocation W27431641961 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C17022365 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C202565627 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C25253098 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C2776932993 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C2777382934 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C2778348171 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C548445021 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConcept C90287048 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C10138342 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C107038049 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C138885662 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C144024400 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C144133560 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C17022365 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C17744445 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C190253527 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C199539241 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C202565627 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C25253098 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C2776932993 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C2777382934 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C2778348171 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C2778355321 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C39389867 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C39549134 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C548445021 @default.
• W2743164196 hasConceptScore W2743164196C90287048 @default.
• W2743164196 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2743164196 hasLocation W27431641961 @default.
• W2743164196 hasLocation W27431641962 @default.
• W2743164196 hasOpenAccess W2743164196 @default.
• W2743164196 hasPrimaryLocation W27431641961 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W119757530 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W1554318826 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W1569002378 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W2101669447 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W2350724957 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W2357529698 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W3121788443 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W3124143631 @default.
• W2743164196 hasRelatedWork W3129959589 @default.

• next