FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2743279503> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2743279503 endingPage "e015452" @default.
• W2743279503 startingPage "e015452" @default.
• W2743279503 abstract "Objectives and design Despite an increasing awareness of the importance of fidelity of delivery within complex behaviour change interventions, it is often poorly assessed. This mixed methods study aimed to establish the fidelity of delivery of a complex self-management intervention and explore the reasons for these findings using a convergent/triangulation design. Setting Feasibility trial of the Self-management of Osteoarthritis and Low back pain through Activity and Skills (SOLAS) intervention ( ISRCTN49875385 ), delivered in primary care physiotherapy. Methods and outcomes 60 SOLAS sessions were delivered across seven sites by nine physiotherapists. Fidelity of delivery of prespecified intervention components was evaluated using (1) audio-recordings (n=60), direct observations (n=24) and self-report checklists (n=60) and (2) individual interviews with physiotherapists (n=9). Quantitatively, fidelity scores were calculated using percentage means and SD of components delivered. Associations between fidelity scores and physiotherapist variables were analysed using Spearman's correlations. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis to explore potential reasons for fidelity scores. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data occurred at an interpretation level using triangulation. Results Quantitatively, fidelity scores were high for all assessment methods; with self-report (92.7%) consistently higher than direct observations (82.7%) or audio-recordings (81.7%). There was significant variation between physiotherapists’ individual scores (69.8% - 100%). Both qualitative and quantitative data (from physiotherapist variables) found that physiotherapists’ knowledge (Spearman's association at p=0.003) and previous experience (p=0.008) were factors that influenced their fidelity. The qualitative data also postulated participant-level (eg, individual needs) and programme-level factors (eg, resources) as additional elements that influenced fidelity. Conclusion The intervention was delivered with high fidelity. This study contributes to the limited evidence regarding fidelity assessment methods within complex behaviour change interventions. The findings suggest a combination of quantitative methods is suitable for the assessment of fidelity of delivery. A mixed methods approach provided a more insightful understanding of fidelity and its influencing factors. Trial registration number ISRCTN49875385; Pre-results." @default.
• W2743279503 created "2017-08-17" @default.
• W2743279503 creator A5004041899 @default.
• W2743279503 creator A5014733040 @default.
• W2743279503 creator A5064409594 @default.
• W2743279503 date "2017-08-01" @default.
• W2743279503 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2743279503 title "Using mixed methods to assess fidelity of delivery and its influencing factors in a complex self-management intervention for people with osteoarthritis and low back pain" @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1707048635 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1885609763 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1900001422 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1966843547 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1972508641 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1977481430 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1979239694 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1989159794 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1992546852 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1993378601 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W1994526997 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2001220319 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2005098924 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2015319990 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2019135956 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2034017929 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2069377931 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2080449404 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2082538594 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2085001923 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2091979774 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2101288585 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2111088875 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2113623873 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2118846366 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2123091787 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2124016273 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2124553793 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2126482346 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2128724957 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2145555293 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2154321537 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2154583277 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2162544110 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2163287225 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2167997731 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2220880288 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2291771822 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2298475434 @default.
• W2743279503 cites W2342506855 @default.
• W2743279503 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015452" @default.
• W2743279503 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5724095" @default.
• W2743279503 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28780544" @default.
• W2743279503 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2743279503 type Work @default.
• W2743279503 sameAs 2743279503 @default.
• W2743279503 citedByCount "50" @default.
• W2743279503 countsByYear W27432795032016 @default.
• W2743279503 countsByYear W27432795032017 @default.
• W2743279503 countsByYear W27432795032018 @default.
• W2743279503 countsByYear W27432795032019 @default.
• W2743279503 countsByYear W27432795032020 @default.
• W2743279503 countsByYear W27432795032021 @default.
• W2743279503 countsByYear W27432795032022 @default.
• W2743279503 countsByYear W27432795032023 @default.
• W2743279503 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2743279503 hasAuthorship W2743279503A5004041899 @default.
• W2743279503 hasAuthorship W2743279503A5014733040 @default.
• W2743279503 hasAuthorship W2743279503A5064409594 @default.
• W2743279503 hasBestOaLocation W27432795031 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C2776459999 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConcept C87156501 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C119599485 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C119857082 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C127413603 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C144024400 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C159110408 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C1862650 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C190248442 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C27415008 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C2776459999 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C2780665704 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C36289849 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C41008148 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C70410870 @default.
• W2743279503 hasConceptScore W2743279503C71924100 @default.

• next