Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2743283691> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 47 of
47
with 100 items per page.
- W2743283691 endingPage "399" @default.
- W2743283691 startingPage "363" @default.
- W2743283691 abstract "In my previous articles, I collected, translated and classified humors that satire on Korea. This is a continuation of them and aims to analyze their structure, aesthetical principle and background of generation. First, humor engenders laughter. Then, how? In general, the issue has been researched by psychologists, not by litterateurs. Psychologists explain humors on the basis of the mechanism of human perception and emotional reaction which occurs in the web of social activities. The prevailing theories are classified into following three: arousal theory, incongruity theory and superiority theory. In this writing, I adopt the superiority theory in order to analyze Chinese satiric humor about Korea. It argues that when one feels superior by supposing that its counterpart is weaker, uglier, sillier, etc, one satirizes the counterpart. Since the establishment of diplomatic ties between Korea and China in 1992, the korean wave (Hanryu) reached its culmination in 2005 by the great success of Daejanggeum in China. By its reaction, anti-hanryu movements appeared in China around the same year and they have been continuously magnified and regenerated through nationalist journalism and internet. Korean history has been distorted and such negative images of Korea as plastic surgery kingdom, Korea-based american army, etc have been exaggerated. Further, the distortion and exaggerations have been main contents of the satiric humor about Korea since 2005 in China." @default.
- W2743283691 created "2017-08-17" @default.
- W2743283691 creator A5012162531 @default.
- W2743283691 date "2017-02-01" @default.
- W2743283691 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2743283691 title "Aspects of Satire on Koreans Seen in Chinese Humors(2)" @default.
- W2743283691 doi "https://doi.org/10.26586/chls.2017..79.016" @default.
- W2743283691 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2743283691 type Work @default.
- W2743283691 sameAs 2743283691 @default.
- W2743283691 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2743283691 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2743283691 hasAuthorship W2743283691A5012162531 @default.
- W2743283691 hasBestOaLocation W27432836911 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConceptScore W2743283691C124952713 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConceptScore W2743283691C138885662 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConceptScore W2743283691C142362112 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConceptScore W2743283691C15744967 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConceptScore W2743283691C41895202 @default.
- W2743283691 hasConceptScore W2743283691C95457728 @default.
- W2743283691 hasIssue "79" @default.
- W2743283691 hasLocation W27432836911 @default.
- W2743283691 hasOpenAccess W2743283691 @default.
- W2743283691 hasPrimaryLocation W27432836911 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W1553547165 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W1998300763 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W2013013153 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W2082327111 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W2555396811 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W2931662336 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W2933608806 @default.
- W2743283691 hasRelatedWork W3049356719 @default.
- W2743283691 hasVolume "null" @default.
- W2743283691 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2743283691 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2743283691 magId "2743283691" @default.
- W2743283691 workType "article" @default.