FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2746985535> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2746985535 endingPage "511" @default.
• W2746985535 startingPage "506" @default.
• W2746985535 abstract "Abstract Objective To compare the time required and the success rate of personnel with 4 different levels of experience to place a humeral intraosseous (IO) catheter versus a jugular venous catheter (IV) in cadaver dogs. Design Prospective study. Setting Veterinary university teaching hospital. Interventions Canine cadavers from recently euthanized dogs were obtained from the cadaver donation program between May and December 2014. Catheter placers (CPs) with varying clinical experience, including a first year emergency and critical care resident, a senior emergency veterinary technician (VTS certified), a final year veterinary student, and an ACVECC diplomate, participated in the study. Each CP catheterized a total of 6 dogs so that there was a total of 6 IO and 6 IV catheters placed, by automatic rotary insertion device (with an EZ‐IO gun) and vascular cut‐down technique, respectively, for each CP. Time for IO catheterization and IV catheterization was recorded and compared. The success of IO catheterization and IV catheterization was verified by visualization of an injection of iodinated contrast material under fluoroscopy within the medullary cavity or vessel. Animals Twenty‐four canine cadavers. Measurements and Main Results Outcomes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test and the Kruskal–Wallis one‐way analysis of variance. The median time for all IO catheterization operators was faster at 55.4 seconds (range 15.0–153.0 s) compared to the median time for all IV catherization operators at 217.3 seconds (range 55.6–614 s). The success rate for IO and IV was equal at 87.5%. Conclusion IO catheterization using an automatic rotary insertion device was performed more rapidly and successfully than jugular venous catheterization using a cut‐down technique in canine cadaver. These findings suggest IO catheterization may be more efficient for gaining vascular access in the appropriate emergency clinical situations when preexisting IV access does not exist." @default.
• W2746985535 created "2017-08-31" @default.
• W2746985535 creator A5033563929 @default.
• W2746985535 creator A5034681155 @default.
• W2746985535 creator A5036821543 @default.
• W2746985535 creator A5044809858 @default.
• W2746985535 date "2017-08-10" @default.
• W2746985535 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2746985535 title "Comparison of time to obtain intraosseous versus jugular venous catheterization on canine cadavers" @default.
• W2746985535 cites W1976054503 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W1976616392 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W1981599263 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2016312826 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2063238021 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2119676870 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2127956267 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2137722844 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2141276399 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2149554812 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2153433387 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2166014727 @default.
• W2746985535 cites W2339959021 @default.
• W2746985535 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12633" @default.
• W2746985535 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28796429" @default.
• W2746985535 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2746985535 type Work @default.
• W2746985535 sameAs 2746985535 @default.
• W2746985535 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2746985535 countsByYear W27469855352018 @default.
• W2746985535 countsByYear W27469855352019 @default.
• W2746985535 countsByYear W27469855352020 @default.
• W2746985535 countsByYear W27469855352021 @default.
• W2746985535 countsByYear W27469855352022 @default.
• W2746985535 countsByYear W27469855352023 @default.
• W2746985535 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2746985535 hasAuthorship W2746985535A5033563929 @default.
• W2746985535 hasAuthorship W2746985535A5034681155 @default.
• W2746985535 hasAuthorship W2746985535A5036821543 @default.
• W2746985535 hasAuthorship W2746985535A5044809858 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConcept C2775836813 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConcept C2775856269 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConcept C2778736619 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConcept C2781267111 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConceptScore W2746985535C141071460 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConceptScore W2746985535C2775836813 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConceptScore W2746985535C2775856269 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConceptScore W2746985535C2776805002 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConceptScore W2746985535C2778736619 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConceptScore W2746985535C2781267111 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConceptScore W2746985535C71924100 @default.
• W2746985535 hasConceptScore W2746985535C91762617 @default.
• W2746985535 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2746985535 hasLocation W27469855351 @default.
• W2746985535 hasLocation W27469855352 @default.
• W2746985535 hasOpenAccess W2746985535 @default.
• W2746985535 hasPrimaryLocation W27469855351 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W1982603634 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W2132480775 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W2382983814 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W2383988233 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W2398749409 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W2512834659 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W2754387739 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W2905256931 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W3023605718 @default.
• W2746985535 hasRelatedWork W3101335475 @default.
• W2746985535 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2746985535 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2746985535 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2746985535 magId "2746985535" @default.
• W2746985535 workType "article" @default.