Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2751871901> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W2751871901 endingPage "e122" @default.
- W2751871901 startingPage "e121" @default.
- W2751871901 abstract "Rates of contraception and use of highly effective methods in young, female cancer survivors are lower than those of the general reproductive-aged female population. Patient-important factors in contraceptive decision-making in young female cancer survivors are needed to develop interventions, but remain unknown. We examined associations between self-reported reasons for contraceptive choice and method used. Cross sectional study. Participants were 18-41 year old female survivors of cancers diagnosed at ages 15-35, and had completed primary cancer treatment at enrollment in the Window study on ovarian function. 480 women at risk of unintended pregnancy were included, excluding those pursuing pregnancy, with no heterosexual intercourse in the prior year, and/or hysterectomy. Participants completed online questionnaires, including contraception questions derived from the National Survey for Family Growth and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Fisher’s Exact test was used to examine the association between self-reported primary reason for contraceptive choice and use of highly effective (WHO Tiers I/II) versus less effective (WHO Tiers III/IV) methods. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons used Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact tests. The mean age of participants was 33.2+4.9 years with 7.6+5.4 years since cancer diagnosis. 83.9% of participants used contraception, including 146 (36.3%), 94 (23.4%), 118 (29.5%), and 44 (11.0%) using WHO Tier I, II, III, and IV methods, respectively. Women using highly effective methods were more likely to cite ease of use, favorable cost, contraceptive efficacy, or menstrual pattern as the primary reason for contraceptive choice, compared with women who used less effective methods (Table). Women who used Tier III/IV methods were more likely to cite ease of obtaining method or lack of hormones as influencing their choice. Side effects, STI prevention, and partner preference were not associated with method. Among women who did not use contraception, common primary reasons for non-use were perceived infertility (32.6%) and desired future pregnancy (9.5%). Significant proportions of young cancer survivors are not using contraception or using less effective methods, increasing risks of unintended pregnancy. Self-reported reasons for contraceptive choice differs between women who use methods of higher versus lower efficacy. These factors may inform development of interventions to improve highly effective contraception use in this population.Tabled 1Self-reported primary reason for contraceptive choice by World Health Organization (WHO) TierTier I/II Method (n = 240)Tier III/IV Method (n = 162)Easy to obtain*8 (3.3)21 (13.0)Easy to use*50 (20.8)12 (7.4)Favorable cost/insurance coverage*9 (3.8)1 (0.6)Contraceptive efficacy*62 (25.8)9 (5.6)Favorable side effect profile23 (9.6)23 (14.2)Lack of hormones*50 (20.8)77 (47.5)Menstrual cycle changes*16 (6.7)0Partner preference5 (2.1)3 (1.9)Sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention5 (2.1)3 (1.9)None of the above12 (5.0)13 (8.0)Tier I: sterilization, intrauterine devices, implants. Tier II: combined hormonal contraceptives,progestin only contraceptives,lactation amenorrhea method. Tier III: condoms, diaphragm, fertility awareness. Tier IV: withdrawal, spermicide Open table in a new tab" @default.
- W2751871901 created "2017-09-15" @default.
- W2751871901 creator A5002727715 @default.
- W2751871901 creator A5019636189 @default.
- W2751871901 creator A5021361800 @default.
- W2751871901 creator A5057795138 @default.
- W2751871901 creator A5069461118 @default.
- W2751871901 date "2017-09-01" @default.
- W2751871901 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2751871901 title "Contraceptive choice among young cancer survivors: what do patients value?" @default.
- W2751871901 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.373" @default.
- W2751871901 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2751871901 type Work @default.
- W2751871901 sameAs 2751871901 @default.
- W2751871901 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2751871901 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2751871901 hasAuthorship W2751871901A5002727715 @default.
- W2751871901 hasAuthorship W2751871901A5019636189 @default.
- W2751871901 hasAuthorship W2751871901A5021361800 @default.
- W2751871901 hasAuthorship W2751871901A5057795138 @default.
- W2751871901 hasAuthorship W2751871901A5069461118 @default.
- W2751871901 hasBestOaLocation W27518719011 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C205545832 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C2780620491 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C118552586 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C121608353 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C126322002 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C131872663 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C144024400 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C149923435 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C205545832 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C27415008 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C2779076696 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C2779234561 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C2780620491 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C2908647359 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C29456083 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C2986817661 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C54355233 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C71924100 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C74909509 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C86803240 @default.
- W2751871901 hasConceptScore W2751871901C99454951 @default.
- W2751871901 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2751871901 hasLocation W27518719011 @default.
- W2751871901 hasOpenAccess W2751871901 @default.
- W2751871901 hasPrimaryLocation W27518719011 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W1987543072 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W2268527706 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W2279163661 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W2804569284 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W3217012476 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W4298356025 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W66787087 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W2090010541 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W2299088287 @default.
- W2751871901 hasRelatedWork W2729091145 @default.
- W2751871901 hasVolume "108" @default.
- W2751871901 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2751871901 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2751871901 magId "2751871901" @default.
- W2751871901 workType "article" @default.