FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2753418644> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2753418644 startingPage "1319" @default.
• W2753418644 abstract "Background: Some students of Electrical Engineering experience a phenomenon of reading negative logic gates at slower process. Literatures suggested information processing model for reading. Most literatures studied text reading, few studied logic circuit reading. This paper presents some concrete evidences from eye movement which show some differences on reading process between positive and negative logic gates. The findings support the phenomenon of slow reading process. Purpose: This paper presents an experiment to verify whether students read negative logic gates slower than positive logic gates. Based on the theory of information processing model, our hypothesis suggests that the reasoning phase of reading negative logic gates is slower than reading positive logic gates. Design/Method: This study, by using an eye tracker, adopts a single experimental set by inviting 35 computer science students from a vocational high school. This experiment was a single test and a 2 3 factorial quasi-experimental design. Independent variables were two gates (positive logic AND gate and negative logic AND gate) and three Regions of Interest (ROIs in short) (input ROI, gate symbol ROI, and output ROI). This experiment only considered two input signals for the input ROI variable. There are four dependent variables for this study within participants' eye movement factors, namely, the latency of first fixation, the duration of first fixation, the number of fixations, and the total contact time. All dependent variables were tested by t-test to verify proposed hypotheses. Results: Based on the results of analysed experimental data, the findings include: 1). for input ROI, only the latency of first fixation shows the significant difference, 2). for gate symbol ROI, there are no significant differences, 3). for output ROI, the duration of first fixation, the number of fixations, and the total contact time show significant differences. These evidences support our hypotheses. The findings also argue that, in teaching and learning practice, the frequency of reading negative logic gates is too low. Conclusions: To investigate the phenomenon of reading process of slower reading pace on negative logic gates, 31 participants were invited to conduct an eye movement experiment. Based on t-test results of eye movement data, the reasoning phase (figuring out the output value) of reading negative logic gates consumes more time than reading positive logic gates. The authors therefore identify that the slower reading might come from the lesser exposure with the negative logic gates. This paper provides." @default.
• W2753418644 created "2017-09-15" @default.
• W2753418644 creator A5038844313 @default.
• W2753418644 creator A5045222839 @default.
• W2753418644 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2753418644 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2753418644 title "Variation of reading methods for positive and negative logic and gates: Examining eye movement" @default.
• W2753418644 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2753418644 type Work @default.
• W2753418644 sameAs 2753418644 @default.
• W2753418644 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2753418644 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2753418644 hasAuthorship W2753418644A5038844313 @default.
• W2753418644 hasAuthorship W2753418644A5045222839 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C131017901 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConcept C94375191 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C11413529 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C131017901 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C138885662 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C154945302 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C33923547 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C41008148 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C41895202 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C554936623 @default.
• W2753418644 hasConceptScore W2753418644C94375191 @default.
• W2753418644 hasLocation W27534186441 @default.
• W2753418644 hasOpenAccess W2753418644 @default.
• W2753418644 hasPrimaryLocation W27534186441 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W1156568792 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W1544762641 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W1956486965 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2115998851 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2144727592 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2386297801 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2407820352 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2583124046 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2787873964 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2805853905 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2922214032 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2985145135 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W3023326105 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W3034837209 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W3127714243 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W3170431482 @default.
• W2753418644 hasRelatedWork W2246523543 @default.
• W2753418644 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2753418644 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2753418644 magId "2753418644" @default.
• W2753418644 workType "article" @default.