FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W275475759> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W275475759 startingPage "607" @default.
• W275475759 abstract "ABSTRACT. This paper is about a necessary regulatory. The institution regards the final solutions and those which are found to be inconsistent with the law. Over the time, they have received different solutions, although they refer to identical cases or about the same. The regulation considers a new composition of the Supreme Court that hears the appeal in the interest of the law; it also provides a new composition of the bench, the need for reasoned opinions of several Romanian and European high courts, as well as a deadline for settlement and communication of the solution.Keywords: appeal in the interest of law, rapporteurs, random appointment of judges.1. The appeal in the interest of lawIn order to ensure consistent interpretation and application of criminal law and criminal procedure throughout the country, the general prosecutor of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, ex officio or at the request of the Minister of Justice, the leading board of the High Court of Cassation and Justice and the leading boards of the courts of appeal are required to ask the Supreme Court to rule on the matters of law which have received a different resolution from the courts. It therefore refers to final settled causes, covering the same factual situation, but which were legally assigned differently by the courts of appeal in the country. These solutions which are legally assigned differently are not dissolved.Therefore, the application must include the different solutions of the problem of law and their motivation, the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, of the European Court of Human Rights or, where appropriate, of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the views expressed in relevant literature in the field, as well as the solution that is proposed to be given in the appeal in the interest of law.The law also includes an imperative provision: the appeal in the interest of law must be accompanied, under the penalty of rejection as inadmissible, by copies of the final court decisions indicating that the legal issues forming the subject of the trial have been resolved differently by the courts.1The appeal in the interest of law is admissible - the legislature says in the content of article 472 Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) - only where it is proved that the legal issues forming the subject of the trial have been resolved differently by final court decisions, documents that must be attached to the application.2. The judgment of the appeal in the interest of lawThe current regulation, different from that existing before the entry into force of this Code of Criminal Procedure, provides that an appeal in the interest of law shall be judged by a panel composed of the President of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, the four chairmen of departments of the Supreme Court, 14 judges of the department in whose jurisdiction the legal issue which was resolved differently by the courts falls, and also by two judges of the other sections, so in total, 21 judges, the panel being chaired by the President of the H.C.C.J.If the legal issue is of interest for two or more departments of the Supreme Court, its President sets the departments where the 20 judges who will enter the panel come from.The appointment of judges is made randomly.Upon receiving the request for promoting the appeal in the interest of law, the President of the Supreme Court will appoint a judge whose duty is to prepare and present a report on that appeal, and if it comes to issues which affect several departments, the number of the judges who will draw the report is of three magistrates.In order that the report be as complete as possible and thus to provide real help in making the decision, the President may also request the written opinion of some renowned experts in the field.The report will include the different solutions given to the legal issues and the arguments on which they are based, the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, of the European Court of Human Rights, of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the consulted specialists' opinion, as well as the doctrine in the field. …" @default.
• W275475759 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W275475759 creator A5049420129 @default.
• W275475759 date "2012-07-01" @default.
• W275475759 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W275475759 title "Requirements for Ensuring Uniform Legal Practice" @default.
• W275475759 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W275475759 type Work @default.
• W275475759 sameAs 275475759 @default.
• W275475759 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W275475759 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W275475759 hasAuthorship W275475759A5049420129 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C105639569 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C115314567 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C136576888 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C2777063073 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C50688660 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W275475759 hasConcept C87501996 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C10138342 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C105639569 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C115314567 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C136576888 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C139621336 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C144133560 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C145097563 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C17744445 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C199539241 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C2777063073 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C2778272461 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C2778449503 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C2910001868 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C50688660 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C71043370 @default.
• W275475759 hasConceptScore W275475759C87501996 @default.
• W275475759 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W275475759 hasLocation W2754757591 @default.
• W275475759 hasOpenAccess W275475759 @default.
• W275475759 hasPrimaryLocation W2754757591 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2037619326 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2215121010 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2260298994 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2266627847 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2269179203 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2383911691 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2563264323 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2612185733 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2772636863 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W29922203 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W3022655325 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W3045047179 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W3092464102 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W3103066691 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W3143674550 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W3160141254 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W3164407776 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W3207688593 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W47921716 @default.
• W275475759 hasRelatedWork W2185832671 @default.
• W275475759 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W275475759 isParatext "false" @default.
• W275475759 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W275475759 magId "275475759" @default.
• W275475759 workType "article" @default.