FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2755048846> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2755048846 abstract "In clinical practice, assessment is important for the selection of intervention strategies, goal setting, prognosis and the evaluation of the progression made towards the treatment goals. For example, we need to assess the patients9 perceptions on how the disease, functioning and disability interferes with their life situation. Furthermore, we should assess how they can cope with stressful events, what social support they experience and how they adjust to living with a chronic disease. The assessment should provide information on problems, needs and priorities of the patients, as well as on strengths and resources. Based on the initial assessment, mutually agreed treatment goals and treatment strategies can be defined together with the patients. We need to be aware of the differences, strengths and weaknesses of observations (e.g. Barthel Index), measures (walking speed) and self-reported questionnaires (patient-reported outcomes) or individualised, patient specific measures (e.g. the Patient-Specific Functional Scale). In most situations, it is recommended to combine generic and specific measures to cover general as well as specific issues of health, functioning and disability or contextual factors. This will also allow the comparison across groups of patients. Each tool used in the assessment should serve a clear objective and should be able to achieve this objective in the given situation. We need to know the relevant measurement properties on reproducibility and validity for the instrument in a given situation. The agreement or the measurement error will tell us, for example, how small a change can be to be detected (i.e. smallest detectable change). This is important when we want to monitor change (evaluation). Reliability indices will tell us how good we can distinguish groups of patients and whether we can use an instrument in a group setting (i.e. in a study; the ICC should be at least 0.7) or for the use with individuals in clinical practice (ICC should be at least 0.9). We can distinguish three types of validity, content validity, construct validity and criterion validity. The content validity informs on how good a tool covers all relevant aspects of the construct to be measured and whether all items cover relevant aspects. An instrument has a good criterion validity if its results are similar to a so-called gold standard (instrument that is known to be valid). The construct validity tells us whether the scores of the measurement instrument are associated with instruments that measure a similar construct and are not associated with scores from instruments that measure non-related concepts. Other important aspects are responsiveness and interpretability. Responsiveness is the ability of an instrument to detect change over time in the construct to be measured. Interpretability means that the scores are understandable and meaningful. Aspects of interpretability are floor and ceiling effects, and whether the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change are known. Of course, the application of an instrument has to be feasible. Therefore, there is often a trade-off between measurement properties and feasibility, i.e. the perfectly reliable and valid instrument might be too expensive or too time consuming. Therefore, a less “perfect” instrument might be chosen. All the mentioned aspects need to be considered when defining an individual assessment strategy for a patient. The assessment and evaluation should be an integrated part of the treatment process. It verifies that the treatment is in line with the needs and priorities of the patients; the documentation of changes might motivate both patients and health professionals and it might increase adherence to the recommended treatments. Disclosure of Interest None declared" @default.
• W2755048846 created "2017-09-25" @default.
• W2755048846 creator A5031989085 @default.
• W2755048846 date "2017-06-01" @default.
• W2755048846 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2755048846 title "SP0194 Principles of assessment in clinical practice" @default.
• W2755048846 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.7226" @default.
• W2755048846 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2755048846 type Work @default.
• W2755048846 sameAs 2755048846 @default.
• W2755048846 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2755048846 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2755048846 hasAuthorship W2755048846A5031989085 @default.
• W2755048846 hasBestOaLocation W27550488461 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C63882131 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConcept C79544238 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C121332964 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C142724271 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C15744967 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C159110408 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C1862650 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C2778755073 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C2779134260 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C2779951463 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C2780665704 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C62520636 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C63882131 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C71924100 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C75630572 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C77805123 @default.
• W2755048846 hasConceptScore W2755048846C79544238 @default.
• W2755048846 hasLocation W27550488461 @default.
• W2755048846 hasOpenAccess W2755048846 @default.
• W2755048846 hasPrimaryLocation W27550488461 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W121443696 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2045088797 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2073858154 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2167210682 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2255333746 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2320549531 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2422372455 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2424652321 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2465138992 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2506139882 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2515498794 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2729390735 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2889064949 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2898760288 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2912048043 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2912137356 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W3093069242 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W97262047 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W142292667 @default.
• W2755048846 hasRelatedWork W2461379048 @default.
• W2755048846 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2755048846 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2755048846 magId "2755048846" @default.
• W2755048846 workType "article" @default.