FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2756053721> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2756053721 abstract "Although several risk assessment tools are in use, uncertainties on their accuracy in detecting fall risk already exist. Choosing the most accurate tool for hospital inpatient is still a challenge for the organizations. We aimed to retrospectively assess the appropriateness of a fall risk prevention program with the STRATIFY assessment tool in detecting acute-care inpatient fall risk.Number of falls and near falls, occurred from January 2014 to March 2015, was collected through the incident reporting web-system implemented in the hospital's intranet. We reported whether the fall risk was assessed with the STRATIFY assessment tool and, if so, which was the judgement. Primary outcome was the proportion of inpatients identified as high risk of fall among inpatients who fell (True Positive Rate), and the proportion of inpatients identified as low-risk that experienced a fall howsoever (False Negative Rate). Characteristics of population and fall events were described among subgroups of low risk and high risk inpatients.We collected 365 incident reports from 40 hospital units, 349 (95.6%) were real falls and 16 (4.4%) were near falls. The fall risk assessment score at patient's admission had been reported in 289 (79%) of the overall incident reports. Thus, 74 (20.3%) fallers were actually not assessed with the STRATIFY, even though the majority of them presented risk recommended to be assessed. The True Positive Rate was 35.6% (n = 101, 95% CI 30% - 41.1%). The False Negative Rate was 64.4% (n = 183, 95% CI 58.9%-70%) of fallers, nevertheless they incurred in a fall. The STRATIFY mean score was 1.3 ± 1.4; the median was 1 (IQQ 0-2).The prevention program using only the STRATIFY tool was found to be not adequate to screen our inpatients population. The incorrect identification of patients' needs leads to allocate resources to erroneous priorities and to untargeted interventions, decreasing healthcare performance and quality." @default.
• W2756053721 created "2017-09-25" @default.
• W2756053721 creator A5006168651 @default.
• W2756053721 creator A5061340596 @default.
• W2756053721 creator A5068724047 @default.
• W2756053721 creator A5091097820 @default.
• W2756053721 date "2017-09-15" @default.
• W2756053721 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2756053721 title "Fall prevention: is the STRATIFY tool the right instrument in Italian Hospital inpatient? A retrospective observational study" @default.
• W2756053721 cites W1529624727 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W1571696772 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W1577040311 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W1602979957 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W1972635038 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2006585716 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2014890706 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2024376704 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2031311148 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2031798142 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2035647453 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2060687237 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2098489565 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2106782939 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2109882800 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2122384745 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2124386888 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2128955428 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2137147896 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2158190397 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2162793425 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2171151223 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2208999568 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2268085737 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2297352838 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2334026431 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2398701228 @default.
• W2756053721 cites W2401455950 @default.
• W2756053721 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2583-7" @default.
• W2756053721 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5602910" @default.
• W2756053721 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28915808" @default.
• W2756053721 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2756053721 type Work @default.
• W2756053721 sameAs 2756053721 @default.
• W2756053721 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2756053721 countsByYear W27560537212019 @default.
• W2756053721 countsByYear W27560537212020 @default.
• W2756053721 countsByYear W27560537212021 @default.
• W2756053721 countsByYear W27560537212022 @default.
• W2756053721 countsByYear W27560537212023 @default.
• W2756053721 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2756053721 hasAuthorship W2756053721A5006168651 @default.
• W2756053721 hasAuthorship W2756053721A5061340596 @default.
• W2756053721 hasAuthorship W2756053721A5068724047 @default.
• W2756053721 hasAuthorship W2756053721A5091097820 @default.
• W2756053721 hasBestOaLocation W27560537211 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C150241267 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C2776516907 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C2909164965 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C77595967 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C12174686 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C126322002 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C127413603 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C150241267 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C167135981 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C190385971 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C194828623 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C23131810 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C2776516907 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C2908647359 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C2909164965 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C3017944768 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C38652104 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C41008148 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C71924100 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C77595967 @default.
• W2756053721 hasConceptScore W2756053721C99454951 @default.
• W2756053721 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2756053721 hasLocation W27560537211 @default.
• W2756053721 hasLocation W27560537212 @default.
• W2756053721 hasLocation W27560537213 @default.
• W2756053721 hasLocation W27560537214 @default.
• W2756053721 hasLocation W27560537215 @default.
• W2756053721 hasLocation W27560537216 @default.
• W2756053721 hasOpenAccess W2756053721 @default.
• W2756053721 hasPrimaryLocation W27560537211 @default.
• W2756053721 hasRelatedWork W1971579841 @default.
• W2756053721 hasRelatedWork W2205393237 @default.

• next