FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2757331389> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2757331389 endingPage "44" @default.
• W2757331389 startingPage "44" @default.
• W2757331389 abstract "INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggests 42 percent of surgeons report their patients are seeking aesthetic surgery to improve their appearance on Instagram and other social media.1 Despite the rising influence of Instagram in plastic surgery, few academic publications address Instagram, let alone evaluate its utilization in plastic surgery. We thus set out to systematically answer the following two questions: 1) what plastic surgery-related content is being posted to Instagram, and 2) who is posting this content? METHODS: Twenty-one Instagram plastic surgery related hashtags were queried. Content analysis was used to qualitatively evaluate each of the nine “top” posts associated with each hashtag (189 posts). Duplicate posts and those not relevant to plastic surgery were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 1,789,270 posts utilized the twenty-one hashtags sampled in this study. Of the top 189 posts for these 21 queried hashtags, 163 posts met inclusion criteria. American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) board certified plastic surgeons accounted for only 17.8% of top posts (29 posts), whereas those not board certified by ABPS or RCPSC accounted for 26.4% (43 posts). Excluding foreign surgeons, otolaryngologists made up the largest group of non-ABPS or RCPSC board certified surgeons, with 7.4% of top posts (12 posts). Also included in this cohort were dermatologists (9 posts), general surgeons (6 posts), gynecologists (4 posts), family medicine physicians (2 posts), and an emergency medicine physician (1 post). All of these non-plastic surgery trained physicians marketed themselves as “cosmetic surgeons”. Nine of these top posts (5.5%) were by non-physicians. This included dentists (4 posts), spas with no associated physician (4 posts), and a hair salon (one post). The majority of these posts were for self-promotional (94 posts, 67.1%) as opposed to educational (46 posts, 32.9%) purposes. Board certified plastic surgeons were significantly more likely to post educational content to Instagram as compared to non-plastic surgeons (62.1% vs. 38.1%, p = .02). CONCLUSION: ASPS board eligible and board-certified plastic surgeons are underrepresented amongst physicians posting top plastic surgery-related content to Instagram. Given that the increasing number of non-plastic surgeons performing cosmetic procedures may come at the expense of patient safety and outcomes,2–4 our findings as mentioned here present a possible cause for concern. Reference Citations: 1. American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Annual Survey Statistics. 2017 Jan. Available at: http://www.aafprs.org/media/stats_polls/m_stats.html. 2. Mioton LM, Buck DW II, Gart MS, Hanwright PJ, Wang E, Kim JY. “A Multivariate regression analysis of panniculectomy outcomes: Does plastic surgery training matter?” Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 604e-612e. 3. O’Donnell J. “Lack of training can be deadly in cosmetic surgery.” USA Today. September 15, 2011. 4. Shah A, Patel A, Smetona J, Rohrich RJ, “Public Perception of Cosmetic Surgeons versus Plastic Surgeons: Increasing Transparency to Educate Patients.” Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Feb; 129(2):544e-557e." @default.
• W2757331389 created "2017-10-06" @default.
• W2757331389 creator A5019434608 @default.
• W2757331389 creator A5020202690 @default.
• W2757331389 creator A5032134663 @default.
• W2757331389 creator A5086005204 @default.
• W2757331389 creator A5086764690 @default.
• W2757331389 date "2017-09-01" @default.
• W2757331389 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2757331389 title "Abstract: Plastic Surgery-Related Hashtag Utilization on Instagram and Implications for Education and Marketing" @default.
• W2757331389 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gox.0000526223.33465.5c" @default.
• W2757331389 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5636343" @default.
• W2757331389 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2757331389 type Work @default.
• W2757331389 sameAs 2757331389 @default.
• W2757331389 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2757331389 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2757331389 hasAuthorship W2757331389A5019434608 @default.
• W2757331389 hasAuthorship W2757331389A5020202690 @default.
• W2757331389 hasAuthorship W2757331389A5032134663 @default.
• W2757331389 hasAuthorship W2757331389A5086005204 @default.
• W2757331389 hasAuthorship W2757331389A5086764690 @default.
• W2757331389 hasBestOaLocation W27573313891 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C137762411 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C2776474047 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C2777106319 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C2777280699 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C2988064887 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C109359841 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C137762411 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C141071460 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C15744967 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C17744445 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C199539241 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C2776474047 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C2777106319 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C2777280699 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C2988064887 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C46304622 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C509550671 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C512399662 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C518677369 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C71924100 @default.
• W2757331389 hasConceptScore W2757331389C77805123 @default.
• W2757331389 hasIssue "9S" @default.
• W2757331389 hasLocation W27573313891 @default.
• W2757331389 hasLocation W27573313892 @default.
• W2757331389 hasLocation W27573313893 @default.
• W2757331389 hasOpenAccess W2757331389 @default.
• W2757331389 hasPrimaryLocation W27573313891 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W186661980 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W2073375187 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W2093064554 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W2136831278 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W2301037705 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W2411372698 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W2783677978 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W2951002589 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W4200386786 @default.
• W2757331389 hasRelatedWork W4380447519 @default.
• W2757331389 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2757331389 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2757331389 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2757331389 magId "2757331389" @default.
• W2757331389 workType "article" @default.