FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2757504903> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2757504903 abstract "Context: Gamification is defined as “the use of game design elements in non-game contexts” (Deterding, Dixon, Khaled, & Nacke, 2011). Gamification is a valuable approach as regards making non-game products, services or applications more enjoyable, more motivating and/or engaging to use (Deterding et al., 2011). Gamified Software has undergone a very important growth. It is, therefore, currently very popular, and this means by which to engage users is becoming a growing trend (Deterding et al., 2011). We therefore believe that the impact of gamified software on users and many areas of society and economy will probably be very high and that the assessment of and improvement to its quality may be necessary. Although there are standard quality models that can be used to assess the quality of any software product, such as the ISO 25010 (ISO, 2011b), they are generic and need to be tailored to specific domains, since quality models can differ considerably from one domain to another (Franch & Carvallo, 2003).Objective: Although researchers have addressed the quality of gamified software, there is currently no quality model that considers the specific quality attributes and quality characteristics of gamified software. Therefore, the main objective of this PhD thesis is the development and validation of a Quality in use model for gamified software, which has been denominated as the QU-GamSoft model. This quality model is an adaptation of the Quality in use model (ISO, 2011b) that considers the specific quality attributes and quality characteristics of gamified software.Method: The main objective of this PhD thesis has been achieved using several research methods that we considered to be most appropriate for each partial objective. A “Systematic Mapping Study” research method that was used to carry out the literature review in order to analyze the state of the art and to discover the existing initiatives on gamified software quality. The “Survey” empirical research method that was used to refine the QU-GamSoft model by gathering the opinions of experts in gamified software development as regards the understandability and relevance of the proposed quality attributes. Finally, the “Case Study” empirical research method that was used to investigate the applicability and usefulness of the QU-GamSoft model in industrial and real-life contexts.Result: A quality in model for gamified software (QU-GamSoft) have proposed and developed. The construction process of the QU-GamSoft model followed a top-down approach (Franch & Carvallo, 2003) and it was based on the ISO/IEC 25010 (ISO, 2011b) standard and on the results of an SMS on gamified software quality. The QU-GamSoft model was refined by means of a survey of experts on gamified software development as regards the understandability and importance of the quality attributes. Results of this survey show that the definitions of the quality attributes are understandable for most of the respondents of the survey and that most the quality attributes of the QU-GamSoft model are to some extent important. Finally, in order to demonstrate the applicability and usefulness of the QU-GamSoft model in industrial or real-life contexts two case studies were carried out.Conclusion: We have developed and validated a quality in use model for gamified software (QU-GamSoft) that is an extension of ISO/IEC 25010 standard (ISO, 2011b), but specific for gamified software, that has been agreed on by experts on gamified software development. The QU-GamSoft model considers attributes that are not considered in the standard quality in use model and is useful in practice, in order to allow gamified designers and developers to evaluate and improve the quality of the gamified software they build." @default.
• W2757504903 created "2017-10-06" @default.
• W2757504903 creator A5079999662 @default.
• W2757504903 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2757504903 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2757504903 title "evaluating the quality in use of gamified software" @default.
• W2757504903 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2757504903 type Work @default.
• W2757504903 sameAs 2757504903 @default.
• W2757504903 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2757504903 countsByYear W27575049032018 @default.
• W2757504903 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2757504903 hasAuthorship W2757504903A5079999662 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C115903868 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C117447612 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C139807058 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C176035894 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C188329197 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C529173508 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C111472728 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C115903868 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C117447612 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C120665830 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C121332964 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C138885662 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C139807058 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C151730666 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C176035894 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C188329197 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C199360897 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C2524010 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C2777904410 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C2779343474 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C2779530757 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C33923547 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C41008148 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C529173508 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C86803240 @default.
• W2757504903 hasConceptScore W2757504903C90673727 @default.
• W2757504903 hasLocation W27575049031 @default.
• W2757504903 hasOpenAccess W2757504903 @default.
• W2757504903 hasPrimaryLocation W27575049031 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W131132259 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W1485405215 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W1544816205 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W1980065435 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2012600829 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2018081790 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2038275474 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2054976755 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2128379039 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2339078989 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2343926155 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2604364937 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2605243013 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2760451453 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2892093463 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2896330230 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2898293065 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W2981407395 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W3197728352 @default.
• W2757504903 hasRelatedWork W7341430 @default.
• W2757504903 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2757504903 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2757504903 magId "2757504903" @default.
• W2757504903 workType "article" @default.