FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W275815218> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W275815218 endingPage "1358" @default.
• W275815218 startingPage "1347" @default.
• W275815218 abstract "This study purposed to analyze differences in body measurement between the 2D direct body measuring method and the 3D body scan measuring method and to perform the appearance evaluation and cross-sectional evaluation of the fit of pants to which body measurements obtained by each measuring method were applied. Body measuring was conducted in 10 women in their 20s-30s using 2D direct body measuring and 3D automatic measuring with Hamamatsu body scanner. Among the 10 women, 3 participated in experimental garment wearing. Experimental pants were made using their 2D direct body measurements and 3D automatic measurements, and wearing tests were performed through expert evaluation and cross-sectional evaluation. The results of the experiment were as follows. According to the results of comparative analysis on differences between 2D direct body measurements and 3D scan measurements, 3D automatic measurements were significantly larger in bust circumference, ankle circumference, armscye circumference, shoulder length, scye depth, and arm length. As circumferences measured with the 3D body scanner were somewhat larger than directly measured ones, it is suggested to adjust ease when using existing pattern making methods. We prepared experimental garments by the same pattern making method through applying body measurements obtained with the two measuring methods, and assessed the fit of the garment comparatively through expert evaluation and 3D scan cross-sectional evaluation. According to the results, 2D-pants using 2D direct body measurements was slightly tighter than 3D-pants using 3D measurements in waist circumference, hip circumference, and abdominal circumference. In the results of comparing appearance in terms of the fit of the experimental garment in each subject, significant difference was observed in most of the compared items. This result suggests that 3D automatic body measuring data may show different accuracy according to body shape and therefore it is necessary to examine difference between 2D direct body measurements and 3D automatic measurements according to body shape." @default.
• W275815218 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W275815218 creator A5041599982 @default.
• W275815218 creator A5075919843 @default.
• W275815218 creator A5089005807 @default.
• W275815218 date "2011-12-01" @default.
• W275815218 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W275815218 title "Comparative Analysis of Body Measurement and Fit Evaluation between 2D Direct Body Measuring and 3D Body Scan Measuring" @default.
• W275815218 cites W1526725862 @default.
• W275815218 cites W1966032616 @default.
• W275815218 cites W1975585858 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2018786397 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2027637496 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2046285927 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2047386711 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2054016372 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2054808619 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2065110931 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2078969437 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2089634087 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2123338878 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2136594847 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2146799204 @default.
• W275815218 cites W3005276649 @default.
• W275815218 cites W2170110154 @default.
• W275815218 cites W844316774 @default.
• W275815218 doi "https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2011.19.6.1347" @default.
• W275815218 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W275815218 type Work @default.
• W275815218 sameAs 275815218 @default.
• W275815218 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W275815218 countsByYear W2758152182015 @default.
• W275815218 countsByYear W2758152182016 @default.
• W275815218 countsByYear W2758152182017 @default.
• W275815218 countsByYear W2758152182020 @default.
• W275815218 countsByYear W2758152182022 @default.
• W275815218 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W275815218 hasAuthorship W275815218A5041599982 @default.
• W275815218 hasAuthorship W275815218A5075919843 @default.
• W275815218 hasAuthorship W275815218A5089005807 @default.
• W275815218 hasBestOaLocation W2758152181 @default.
• W275815218 hasConcept C3018708532 @default.
• W275815218 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W275815218 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W275815218 hasConceptScore W275815218C3018708532 @default.
• W275815218 hasConceptScore W275815218C71924100 @default.
• W275815218 hasConceptScore W275815218C99508421 @default.
• W275815218 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W275815218 hasLocation W2758152181 @default.
• W275815218 hasOpenAccess W275815218 @default.
• W275815218 hasPrimaryLocation W2758152181 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W1591809865 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W1997924614 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W2363216777 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W2415165804 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W2619671900 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W2800266417 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W2996537995 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W3163390162 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W65945375 @default.
• W275815218 hasRelatedWork W762165622 @default.
• W275815218 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W275815218 isParatext "false" @default.
• W275815218 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W275815218 magId "275815218" @default.
• W275815218 workType "article" @default.