FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2758382768> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2758382768 endingPage "E397" @default.
• W2758382768 startingPage "E397" @default.
• W2758382768 abstract "Communities of practice (CoPs) are defined as groups of people sharing common concerns, problems, or passions about a topic, and who deepen their knowledge and expertise by interacting on an ongoing basis. Cancer Care Ontario’s (CCO) Radiation Treatment Program (RTP) has developed multiple CoPs involving staff across 14 regional centres on the basis that knowledge is a critical asset that needs to be managed strategically. This study is to assess the effectiveness of these CoPs on three parameters: knowledge creation, knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE), and community building using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) framework for CoP evaluation. Five CoPs were evaluated: three multi-disciplinary (head and neck, lung, and gynecological cancers) with representation from Radiation Oncology, Medical Physics and Radiation Therapy, and two intra-disciplinary (Radiation Therapy and Medical Physics). Data was collected using prospectively administered member surveys, publications, and interviews with all five CoP site leaders and two randomly-selected members of each CoP. In total 257 unique surveys were completed. Interviews were conducted with 18 CoP leads and members. Most (95%) participants reported that CoP projects were very relevant to their practice and half (50%) reported changes in their practice stemming from involvement in CoPs. Members reported multiple reasons for participating in CoPs: to improve patient care, standardize treatment, share best practices across Ontario, and develop a broader professional network. Members reported benefits of the CoP as improved knowledge transfer and exchange (11/18), increased collaboration between centres (14/18), and creation of a community (13/18). Most (90%) participants reported growth of their professional network as a result of CoPs. Overall 93% of participants and 100% of interviewees reported CoPs are a worthwhile initiative. The largest challenge of CoPs was identified as the time commitment required to participate. CoPs encourage innovation, KTE and improve the sense of community amongst practitioners in Ontario providing a platform to ensure best practices are standardized across the province. Consideration of how to best address the time constraints of members is necessary to ensure continued participation and efficient development of clinical tools in CoPs." @default.
• W2758382768 created "2017-10-06" @default.
• W2758382768 creator A5001659044 @default.
• W2758382768 creator A5020292379 @default.
• W2758382768 creator A5023144533 @default.
• W2758382768 creator A5023658971 @default.
• W2758382768 creator A5031800775 @default.
• W2758382768 creator A5039208847 @default.
• W2758382768 creator A5046106376 @default.
• W2758382768 creator A5089255473 @default.
• W2758382768 date "2017-10-01" @default.
• W2758382768 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2758382768 title "Cancer Care Ontario’s Communities of Practice: A Scoping Evaluation" @default.
• W2758382768 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.1551" @default.
• W2758382768 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2758382768 type Work @default.
• W2758382768 sameAs 2758382768 @default.
• W2758382768 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2758382768 countsByYear W27583827682020 @default.
• W2758382768 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2758382768 hasAuthorship W2758382768A5001659044 @default.
• W2758382768 hasAuthorship W2758382768A5020292379 @default.
• W2758382768 hasAuthorship W2758382768A5023144533 @default.
• W2758382768 hasAuthorship W2758382768A5023658971 @default.
• W2758382768 hasAuthorship W2758382768A5031800775 @default.
• W2758382768 hasAuthorship W2758382768A5039208847 @default.
• W2758382768 hasAuthorship W2758382768A5046106376 @default.
• W2758382768 hasAuthorship W2758382768A5089255473 @default.
• W2758382768 hasBestOaLocation W27583827681 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConcept C2776280689 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConceptScore W2758382768C15744967 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConceptScore W2758382768C19417346 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConceptScore W2758382768C2776280689 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConceptScore W2758382768C509550671 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConceptScore W2758382768C512399662 @default.
• W2758382768 hasConceptScore W2758382768C71924100 @default.
• W2758382768 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2758382768 hasLocation W27583827681 @default.
• W2758382768 hasOpenAccess W2758382768 @default.
• W2758382768 hasPrimaryLocation W27583827681 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W1973628370 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W2049391719 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W3029142792 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W3081138933 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W4318070819 @default.
• W2758382768 hasRelatedWork W2483861517 @default.
• W2758382768 hasVolume "99" @default.
• W2758382768 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2758382768 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2758382768 magId "2758382768" @default.
• W2758382768 workType "article" @default.