Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2759220200> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2759220200 endingPage "6547" @default.
- W2759220200 startingPage "6538" @default.
- W2759220200 abstract "To evaluate plan quality of a novel MRI-compatible direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator using 192 Ir, 60 Co, and 169 Yb HDR brachytherapy sources, for various cervical cancer high-risk clinical target volumes (CTVHR ).The novel DMBT tandem applicator has six peripheral grooves of 1.3-mm diameter along a 5.4-mm thick nonmagnetic tungsten alloy rod. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to benchmark the dosimetric parameters of the 192 Ir, 60 Co, and 169 Yb HDR sources in a water phantom against the literature data. 45 clinical cases that were treated using conventional tandem-and-ring applicators with 192 Ir source (192 Ir-T&R) were selected consecutively from intErnational MRI-guided BRAchytherapy in CErvical cancer (EMBRACE) trial. Then, for each clinical case, 3D dose distribution of each source inside the DMBT and conventional applicators were calculated and imported onto an in-house developed inverse planning optimization code to generate optimal plans. All plans generated by the DMBT tandem-and-ring (DMBT T&R) from all three sources were compared to the respective 192 Ir-T&R plans. For consistency, all plans were normalized to the same CTVHR D90 achieved in clinical plans. The D2 cm3 for organs at risk (OAR) such as bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, and D90, D98, D10, V100, and V200 for CTVHR were calculated.In general, plan quality significantly improved when a conventional tandem (Con.T) is replaced with the DMBT tandem. The target coverage metrics were similar across 192 Ir-T&R and DMBT T&R plans with all three sources (P > 0.093). 60 Co-DMBT T&R generated greater hot spots and less dose homogeneity in the target volumes compared with the 192 Ir- and 169 Yb-DMBT T&R plans. Mean OAR doses in the DMBT T&R plans were significantly smaller (P < 0.0084) than the 192 Ir-T&R plans. Mean bladder D2 cm3 was reduced by 4.07%, 4.15%, and 5.13%, for the 192 Ir-, 60 Co-, and 169 Yb-DMBT T&R plans respectively. Mean rectum (sigmoid) D2 cm3 was reduced by 3.17% (3.63%), 2.57% (3.96%), and 4.65% (4.34%) for the 192 Ir-, 60 Co-, and 169 Yb-DMBT T&R plans respectively. The DMBT T&R plans with the 169 Yb source generally resulted in the greatest OAR sparing when the CTVHR were larger and irregular in shape, while for smaller and regularly shaped CTVHR (<30 cm3 ), OAR sparing between the sources were comparable.The DMBT tandem provides a promising alternative to the Con.T design with significant improvement in the plan quality for various target volumes. The DMBT T&R plans generated with the three sources of varying energies generated superior plans compared to the conventional T&R applicators. Plans generated with the 169 Yb-DMBT T&R produced best results for larger and irregularly shaped CTVHR in terms of OAR sparing. Thus, this study suggests that the combination of the DMBT tandem applicator with varying energy sources can work synergistically to generate improved plans for cervical cancer brachytherapy." @default.
- W2759220200 created "2017-10-06" @default.
- W2759220200 creator A5003261188 @default.
- W2759220200 creator A5003540481 @default.
- W2759220200 creator A5007741803 @default.
- W2759220200 creator A5042921990 @default.
- W2759220200 creator A5049782124 @default.
- W2759220200 creator A5073976392 @default.
- W2759220200 creator A5087063355 @default.
- W2759220200 date "2017-10-23" @default.
- W2759220200 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2759220200 title "Direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) for treatment of cervical cancer: A planning study with <sup>192</sup>Ir, <sup>60</sup>Co, and <sup>169</sup>Yb HDR sources" @default.
- W2759220200 cites W1917956365 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W1923901224 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W1975364211 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W1977354332 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W1982528333 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W1983603253 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W1985214870 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2005626614 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2010022376 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2013991727 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2016805948 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2017394460 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2022519467 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2027395519 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2028679169 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2032653550 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2033905828 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2036158460 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2042262831 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2046727315 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2059369695 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2065574271 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2073376009 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2075401704 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2076075334 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2081811335 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2081977840 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2089573650 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2090672949 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2116423847 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2122321342 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2123934092 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2131860931 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2159402744 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2169961286 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2195360577 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2278451790 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2341208453 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2345268804 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2397102978 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2421808668 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2470567335 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2472531047 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2473222210 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2483422325 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2516690090 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2523650996 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W2614033103 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W4384257434 @default.
- W2759220200 cites W979518541 @default.
- W2759220200 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12598" @default.
- W2759220200 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28940520" @default.
- W2759220200 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2759220200 type Work @default.
- W2759220200 sameAs 2759220200 @default.
- W2759220200 citedByCount "29" @default.
- W2759220200 countsByYear W27592202002018 @default.
- W2759220200 countsByYear W27592202002019 @default.
- W2759220200 countsByYear W27592202002020 @default.
- W2759220200 countsByYear W27592202002021 @default.
- W2759220200 countsByYear W27592202002022 @default.
- W2759220200 countsByYear W27592202002023 @default.
- W2759220200 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2759220200 hasAuthorship W2759220200A5003261188 @default.
- W2759220200 hasAuthorship W2759220200A5003540481 @default.
- W2759220200 hasAuthorship W2759220200A5007741803 @default.
- W2759220200 hasAuthorship W2759220200A5042921990 @default.
- W2759220200 hasAuthorship W2759220200A5049782124 @default.
- W2759220200 hasAuthorship W2759220200A5073976392 @default.
- W2759220200 hasAuthorship W2759220200A5087063355 @default.
- W2759220200 hasBestOaLocation W27592202001 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C2777416452 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConceptScore W2759220200C104293457 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConceptScore W2759220200C121608353 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConceptScore W2759220200C126322002 @default.
- W2759220200 hasConceptScore W2759220200C126838900 @default.