FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2759296880> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2759296880 abstract "Purpose To determine the patient compliance in completing electronically administered patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores following shoulder arthroscopy, and to determine if dedicated research assistants improve patient compliance. Methods Patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014, were prospectively enrolled into an electronic data collection system with retrospective review of compliance data. A total of 143 patients were included in this study; 406 patients were excluded (for any or all of the following reasons, such as incomplete follow-up, inaccessibility to the order sets, and inability to complete the order sets). All patients were assigned an order set of PROs through an electronic reporting system, with order sets to be completed prior to surgery, as well as 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Compliance rates of form completion were documented. Patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior and/or posterior stabilization were excluded. Results The average age of the patients was 53.1 years, ranging from 20 to 83. Compliance of form completion was highest preoperatively (76%), and then dropped subsequently at 6 months postoperatively (57%) and 12 months postoperatively (45%). Use of research assistants improved compliance by approximately 20% at each time point. No differences were found according to patient gender and age group. Of those completing forms, a majority completed forms at home or elsewhere prior to returning to the office for the clinic visit. Conclusions Electronic administration of PRO may decrease the amount of time required in the office setting for PRO completion by patients. This may be mutually beneficial to providers and patients. It is unclear if an electronic system improves patient compliance in voluntary completion PRO. Compliance rates at final follow-up remain a concern if data are to be used for establishing quality or outcome metrics. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series. To determine the patient compliance in completing electronically administered patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores following shoulder arthroscopy, and to determine if dedicated research assistants improve patient compliance. Patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2014, were prospectively enrolled into an electronic data collection system with retrospective review of compliance data. A total of 143 patients were included in this study; 406 patients were excluded (for any or all of the following reasons, such as incomplete follow-up, inaccessibility to the order sets, and inability to complete the order sets). All patients were assigned an order set of PROs through an electronic reporting system, with order sets to be completed prior to surgery, as well as 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Compliance rates of form completion were documented. Patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior and/or posterior stabilization were excluded. The average age of the patients was 53.1 years, ranging from 20 to 83. Compliance of form completion was highest preoperatively (76%), and then dropped subsequently at 6 months postoperatively (57%) and 12 months postoperatively (45%). Use of research assistants improved compliance by approximately 20% at each time point. No differences were found according to patient gender and age group. Of those completing forms, a majority completed forms at home or elsewhere prior to returning to the office for the clinic visit. Electronic administration of PRO may decrease the amount of time required in the office setting for PRO completion by patients. This may be mutually beneficial to providers and patients. It is unclear if an electronic system improves patient compliance in voluntary completion PRO. Compliance rates at final follow-up remain a concern if data are to be used for establishing quality or outcome metrics." @default.
• W2759296880 created "2017-10-06" @default.
• W2759296880 creator A5008278476 @default.
• W2759296880 creator A5021775280 @default.
• W2759296880 creator A5038294363 @default.
• W2759296880 creator A5044254218 @default.
• W2759296880 creator A5055128851 @default.
• W2759296880 creator A5064391561 @default.
• W2759296880 date "2017-09-01" @default.
• W2759296880 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2759296880 title "Patient Compliance With Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes Following Shoulder Arthroscopy" @default.
• W2759296880 cites W1604999168 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W1758307825 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W1796642829 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W2023570665 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W2044747519 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W2049314982 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W2260996991 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W2271447699 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W2482130312 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W2510333363 @default.
• W2759296880 cites W2536663384 @default.
• W2759296880 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.016" @default.
• W2759296880 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28958797" @default.
• W2759296880 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2759296880 type Work @default.
• W2759296880 sameAs 2759296880 @default.
• W2759296880 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2759296880 countsByYear W27592968802019 @default.
• W2759296880 countsByYear W27592968802020 @default.
• W2759296880 countsByYear W27592968802021 @default.
• W2759296880 countsByYear W27592968802022 @default.
• W2759296880 countsByYear W27592968802023 @default.
• W2759296880 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2759296880 hasAuthorship W2759296880A5008278476 @default.
• W2759296880 hasAuthorship W2759296880A5021775280 @default.
• W2759296880 hasAuthorship W2759296880A5038294363 @default.
• W2759296880 hasAuthorship W2759296880A5044254218 @default.
• W2759296880 hasAuthorship W2759296880A5055128851 @default.
• W2759296880 hasAuthorship W2759296880A5064391561 @default.
• W2759296880 hasBestOaLocation W27592968801 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C2779100052 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C2781460075 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C3019451088 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C141071460 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C15744967 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C167135981 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C1862650 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C194828623 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C2779100052 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C2779162959 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C2781460075 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C3019451088 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C71924100 @default.
• W2759296880 hasConceptScore W2759296880C77805123 @default.
• W2759296880 hasLocation W27592968801 @default.
• W2759296880 hasLocation W27592968802 @default.
• W2759296880 hasOpenAccess W2759296880 @default.
• W2759296880 hasPrimaryLocation W27592968801 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2006886392 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2099412153 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2562569221 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2759296880 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2759296880 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2759296880 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2759296880 magId "2759296880" @default.
• W2759296880 workType "article" @default.