FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W27596145> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W27596145 endingPage "13" @default.
• W27596145 startingPage "5" @default.
• W27596145 abstract "Anatomic changes associated with aseptic loosening make conditions for revision of total knee arthroplasty more diffi-cult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of revision total knee replacement at an average follow-up of 6.1 years.A total of 97 revision knee replacements due to aseptic loosening carried out in the years 1992 to 2003 were evalua-ted. The group included 46 men and 51 women at an average age of 66.8 years. The average preoperative Knee Society Score (KKS) was 31 points and the Functional Score (FS) was 22 points. There were 41 minor operations for AORI type I defects, 49 moderately serious procedures for AORI type II defects and seven major operations for AORI type III defects. In minor procedures standard components were implanted in 14 patients, standard components with cemented stems with extension were used in nine, and polyethylene plateau exchange was carried out in 18 patients. For moderately serious procedures, posterior stabilized components with extended cemented stems were used in 15 patients, revision implants with cementless stems in 26 patients and standard components with cemented stems in eight patients. In seven patients with major surgery, the hinged type of prosthesis was employed. Radiographic results were evaluated on the basis of Ewald's classification.Clinical findings showed improvement of the average KKS from 31 to 74 points at follow-up of 6.1 years. Functional out-comes improved, as shown by the average FS, from 22 to 67 points. Fifteen patients were not satisfied with the outcome of surgery, the causes being aseptic loosening in four, deep infection in eight and pain due to progression of radiolucent lines of the tibia in three patients.The results of revision surgery with component replacement because of aseptic loosening are worse in comparison with those of primary total knee replacement. The average KSS score after revision surgery was 74 points at 6.1-year follow--up, whereas after primary surgery it was 92 points at 6.5 years. The average FS score after revision was 67 points, as compared with 86 points at 6.5 years after primary surgery. Complications involving infection occurred in 8.2 % of the revi-sion cases, but only in 0.8 % of the primary operations. The authors used modular systems because these provide more options. Good outcomes were achieved with morselized bone grafting for filling cavitary defects. In patients with large defects in tibial or femoral metaphyses, posterior stabilized components and cementless intramedullary stems were used with good results.The authors recommend to avoid filling large bone defects with bone cement. They prefer bone grafting. In the case of good quality metaphyseal bone, they use standard components or posterior stabilized components with or without additi-onal cemented or cementless short stem extensions. In the case of poor quality metaphyseal bone with defects, they use revision implants with cementless long stems. The authors have achieved good results with off-set stems." @default.
• W27596145 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W27596145 creator A5055068904 @default.
• W27596145 creator A5076661176 @default.
• W27596145 creator A5078175656 @default.
• W27596145 creator A5090956737 @default.
• W27596145 date "2007-02-01" @default.
• W27596145 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W27596145 title "Revision Knee Arthroplasty due to Aseptic Loosening" @default.
• W27596145 cites W1279354973 @default.
• W27596145 cites W1900874282 @default.
• W27596145 cites W1930395683 @default.
• W27596145 cites W2002946130 @default.
• W27596145 cites W2053829949 @default.
• W27596145 cites W2067271693 @default.
• W27596145 cites W2087276679 @default.
• W27596145 cites W2102193450 @default.
• W27596145 cites W2255512797 @default.
• W27596145 cites W2494517042 @default.
• W27596145 cites W4293240806 @default.
• W27596145 cites W76691624 @default.
• W27596145 doi "https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2007/001" @default.
• W27596145 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17331449" @default.
• W27596145 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W27596145 type Work @default.
• W27596145 sameAs 27596145 @default.
• W27596145 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W27596145 countsByYear W275961452019 @default.
• W27596145 countsByYear W275961452020 @default.
• W27596145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W27596145 hasAuthorship W27596145A5055068904 @default.
• W27596145 hasAuthorship W27596145A5076661176 @default.
• W27596145 hasAuthorship W27596145A5078175656 @default.
• W27596145 hasAuthorship W27596145A5090956737 @default.
• W27596145 hasBestOaLocation W275961451 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C181268634 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C2778104916 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C2780463824 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C3017871827 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W27596145 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C141071460 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C142724271 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C181268634 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C204787440 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C2776164576 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C2778104916 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C2778336525 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C2778715743 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C2780463824 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C3017871827 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C36454342 @default.
• W27596145 hasConceptScore W27596145C71924100 @default.
• W27596145 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W27596145 hasLocation W275961451 @default.
• W27596145 hasLocation W275961452 @default.
• W27596145 hasOpenAccess W27596145 @default.
• W27596145 hasPrimaryLocation W275961451 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W1790095427 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W1907701233 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W2415614717 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W2472833215 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W2795656951 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W2803280315 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W3159984465 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W3185289100 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W4324142334 @default.
• W27596145 hasRelatedWork W2177136184 @default.
• W27596145 hasVolume "74" @default.
• W27596145 isParatext "false" @default.
• W27596145 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W27596145 magId "27596145" @default.
• W27596145 workType "article" @default.