FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2760209909> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2760209909 endingPage "669" @default.
• W2760209909 startingPage "647" @default.
• W2760209909 abstract "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess how employees from historically marginalized groups (men and women of color and white women) perceive Fortune’s “100 Best Companies to Work For”® (BCWF) in terms of two outcomes that are related to diversity and inclusion: fairness and camaraderie. The authors focus on fairness as a way to measure perceptions of general treatment with respect to demographic characteristics associated with bias and discrimination, and on camaraderie as a way to measure perceptions of the inclusiveness of coworker relationships. Design/methodology/approach Hierarchical linear regression models are used to analyze survey responses from 620,802 employees in 1,054 companies that applied for the BCWF list between 2006 and 2011 in the USA. The authors compare the perceptions of employees in firms that are selected for the list to those of their demographic counterparts in firms not selected for the list. The authors also compare the perceptions of employees from historically marginalized groups to those of white men within firms that make the list and examine how these differences compare to the same differences within firms that do not make the list. Findings The findings reveal that the perceptions of men and women of color and white women in companies that make the “best” list are more positive than their demographic counterparts in companies that do not make the list. The authors also find, however, that the perceptions of employees from historically marginalized groups are more negative than those of white men in the “best” workplaces, and these patterns are similar to those in firms that do not make the list. For perceptions of fairness, the differences between employees from historically marginalized groups and white men are smaller in companies that make the list. Research limitations/implications The findings are based on average effect sizes across a large number of companies and employees, and the data do not provide insight into the actual organizational processes that are driving employee perceptions. In addition, the employee survey data are self-reported, and may be subject to recall and self-serving biases. Finally, the authors use measures of fairness and camaraderie that have not been rigorously tested in past research. Practical implications Managers seeking to improve experiences of fairness and camaraderie should pay particular attention to how race/ethnicity and gender influence these experiences, and how they do so intersectionally. Attending to these differences is particularly important to the extent that experiences of fairness and camaraderie are related to organizational trust, the key metric on which companies are selected for the “best” workplaces list, and a quality of organizational relationships that previous research has found to be positively related to key individual and firm-level outcomes. Originality/value The paper provides the first assessment of demographic variation in the outcomes of employees in companies selected for the BCWF. Since selection to this list is based on the presence of trust, the authors’ findings also provide potential insight into how informal organizational processes that are associated with trust, such as leadership behaviors, peer relationships, and workplace norms, are viewed and experienced by men and women of color and white women. Finally, the authors analyze outcomes relating to camaraderie, a construct that has received little attention in the literature." @default.
• W2760209909 created "2017-10-06" @default.
• W2760209909 creator A5018065972 @default.
• W2760209909 creator A5076937272 @default.
• W2760209909 date "2017-09-18" @default.
• W2760209909 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2760209909 title "Are the “best” better for everyone? Demographic variation in employee perceptions of Fortune’s “Best Companies to Work For”" @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1423547258 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1516630716 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1519423436 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1965085721 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1979672335 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1982397230 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1986792585 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1991305101 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1996084238 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1997638227 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W1998716409 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2003595429 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2008569994 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2010711185 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2015211978 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2017288619 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2026100765 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2027844695 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2032325851 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2036921459 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2048954600 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2059446697 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2062425908 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2062726140 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2063841963 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2078887566 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2081101305 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2084363895 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2084747054 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2086258470 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2087245834 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2093868260 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2096320953 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2101979928 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2106343304 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2106573419 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2107038139 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2107092443 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2108992670 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2109507579 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2111667205 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2118979994 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2126891718 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2130140239 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2133144791 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2135204891 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2136263386 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2140454616 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2143564903 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2144365302 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2148660305 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2148690842 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2149242058 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2151082120 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2151256262 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2158260430 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2158378292 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2158451945 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2161729939 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2163816615 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2166066350 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2179809010 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2223652573 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2315398168 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2320971757 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2337002970 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2339180066 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2477999419 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2523679457 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W2567268209 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W3125979231 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W32217022 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W4205617774 @default.
• W2760209909 cites W4214944031 @default.
• W2760209909 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-01-2017-0017" @default.
• W2760209909 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2760209909 type Work @default.
• W2760209909 sameAs 2760209909 @default.
• W2760209909 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2760209909 countsByYear W27602099092018 @default.
• W2760209909 countsByYear W27602099092019 @default.
• W2760209909 countsByYear W27602099092020 @default.
• W2760209909 countsByYear W27602099092021 @default.
• W2760209909 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2760209909 hasAuthorship W2760209909A5018065972 @default.
• W2760209909 hasAuthorship W2760209909A5076937272 @default.
• W2760209909 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2760209909 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W2760209909 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2760209909 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2760209909 hasConcept C144133560 @default.

• next