FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2760763910> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2760763910 abstract "Health checks identify (risk factors for) disease in people without symptoms. They may be offered by the government through population screenings and by other providers to individual users as 'personal health checks'. Health check providers' perspective of 'good' health checks may further the debate on the ethical evaluation and possible regulation of these personal health checks.In 2015, we interviewed twenty Dutch health check providers on criteria for 'good' health checks, and the role these criteria play in their practices.Providers unanimously formulate a number of minimal criteria: Checks must focus on (risk factors for) treatable/preventable disease; Tests must be reliable and clinically valid; Participation must be informed and voluntary; Checks should provide more benefits than harms; Governmental screenings should be cost-effective. Aspirational criteria mentioned were: Follow-up care should be provided; Providers should be skilled and experienced professionals that put the benefit of (potential) users first; Providers should take time and attention. Some criteria were contested: People should be free to test on any (risk factor for) disease; Health checks should only be performed in people at high risk for disease that are likely to implement health advice; Follow up care of privately funded tests should not drain on collective resources. Providers do not always fulfil their own criteria. Their reasons reveal conflicts between criteria, conflicts between criteria and other ethical values, and point to components in the (Dutch) organisation of health care that hinder an ethical provision of health checks. Moreover, providers consider informed consent a criterion that is hard to establish in practice.According to providers, personal health checks should meet the same criteria as population screenings, with the exception of cost-effectiveness. Providers do not always fulfil their own criteria. Results indicate that in thinking about the ethics of health checks potential conflicts between criteria and underlying values should be explicated, guidance in weighing of criteria should be provided and the larger context should be taken into account: other actors than providers need to take up responsibility, and ideally benefits and harms of health checks should be weighed against other measures targeting (risk factors for) disease." @default.
• W2760763910 created "2017-10-06" @default.
• W2760763910 creator A5013397807 @default.
• W2760763910 creator A5071124716 @default.
• W2760763910 creator A5087129013 @default.
• W2760763910 date "2017-10-02" @default.
• W2760763910 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2760763910 title "What is a good health check? An interview study of health check providers’ views and practices" @default.
• W2760763910 cites W1507850465 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W1658236056 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W1862491013 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W189803326 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W1991640972 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2077212561 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2096982504 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2124989853 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2142181526 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2165030669 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2315645614 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2323044363 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2600916415 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2734536011 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2735976172 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W2900127754 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W3117300650 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W4246197713 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W4250459103 @default.
• W2760763910 cites W4300107936 @default.
• W2760763910 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0213-x" @default.
• W2760763910 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5625608" @default.
• W2760763910 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28969671" @default.
• W2760763910 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2760763910 type Work @default.
• W2760763910 sameAs 2760763910 @default.
• W2760763910 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2760763910 countsByYear W27607639102018 @default.
• W2760763910 countsByYear W27607639102022 @default.
• W2760763910 countsByYear W27607639102023 @default.
• W2760763910 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2760763910 hasAuthorship W2760763910A5013397807 @default.
• W2760763910 hasAuthorship W2760763910A5071124716 @default.
• W2760763910 hasAuthorship W2760763910A5087129013 @default.
• W2760763910 hasBestOaLocation W27607639101 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C121242521 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C68122502 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C121242521 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C138885662 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C142724271 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C15744967 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C159110408 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C160735492 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C17744445 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C199539241 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C204787440 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C2778137410 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C2908647359 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C39549134 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C41895202 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C512399662 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C68122502 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C71924100 @default.
• W2760763910 hasConceptScore W2760763910C99454951 @default.
• W2760763910 hasFunder F4320321007 @default.
• W2760763910 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2760763910 hasLocation W27607639101 @default.
• W2760763910 hasLocation W27607639102 @default.
• W2760763910 hasLocation W27607639103 @default.
• W2760763910 hasLocation W27607639104 @default.
• W2760763910 hasLocation W27607639105 @default.
• W2760763910 hasLocation W27607639106 @default.
• W2760763910 hasLocation W27607639107 @default.
• W2760763910 hasLocation W27607639108 @default.
• W2760763910 hasOpenAccess W2760763910 @default.
• W2760763910 hasPrimaryLocation W27607639101 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W1602916760 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W2130722059 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W2192604674 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W2767426083 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W335264500 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W4206949098 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W4247145557 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W4249366611 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W4292674598 @default.
• W2760763910 hasRelatedWork W4302382336 @default.
• W2760763910 hasVolume "18" @default.

• next