FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2761010200> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2761010200 startingPage "869" @default.
• W2761010200 abstract "ABSTRACT Despite calls for reform of Article 17A guardianships for more than twenty-five years, the statute remains unchanged and New York routinely subjects adults with intellectual disabilities to open-ended, plenary guardianships with few, if any, procedural protections. As non-profit legal service providers working in a medical-legal partnership, hospitals refer to our organization, LegalHealth, clients who seek Article 17A guardianships over their loved ones. In this Essay, we discuss the many ways in which Article 17A fails to protect the rights of our clients' children, and the ethically compromised position practitioners are often put in while trying to both advocate for our clients (the Petitioners) and protect the ward (the Respondent). New York has another guardianship statute. Article 81, that, while not perfect, does a better job of protecting the rights of people with intellectual disabilities. Contrary to popular belief, Article 81 proceedings are not any more onerous than Article 17A proceedings. We suggest that the legislature either repeal Article 17A, leaving guardianships to proceed under Article 81, or reform Article 17A to align with protections afforded in Article 81. In the meantime, we suggest some solutions and practice guidelines that practitioners should follow in order to prevent undue violations of the civil liberties and due process rights of people with intellectual disabilities. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 871 I. Background 875 II. Article 17A's Central Flaw Is Its Adoption of a Diagnosis-Driven Approach to People with Intellectual Disabilities, Resulting in the Unconstitutional Denial of Procedural Protections Throughout the Guardianship Process 879 A. Article 17A Fails to Protect People with Intellectual Disabilities by Applying an Unduly Restrictive One-Size Fits All Approach to Guardianship 883 B. Article 17A Violates the Ward's Right to Due Process by Failing to Ensure Her Right to Participate in the Guardianship Proceeding 885 C. Article 17A Endangers Persons with Intellectual Disabilities by Providing No Post-Appointment Protections 890 D. Recent Court Attempts to Salvage Article 17A 892 1. In re Mark C.H. and Annual Reporting Requirements After Appointment of a Guardian 892 2. In re Dameris L. and the Least Restrictive Alternative to Achieve the State's Goal 895 III. Article 17A Does Not Live up to Its Original Purpose of Eliminating the Costs and Complications Involved in Guardianship Proceedings and Is Not, in Practice, Less Onerous Than Article 81 Guardianships 898 IV. Recommendations 901 A. Article 17A Should Be Repealed 901 B. While We Wait for Repeal or Reform: Ethical and Practical Considerations 906 1. Considerations Prior to Representation 906 2. Considerations During and After Representation 908 a. Practitioners May Commit to Only Assisting with Article 81 Guardianships 908 b. Practitioners May Ask the Court to Read Protections Guaranteed under Article 81 Proceedings into Article 17A 909 3. Ethical Considerations 912 Conclusion 913 I love to discover potential in people who aren't thought to have any. --Oliver Sachs INTRODUCTION Sarah (1) is a twenty-two-year-old woman with intellectual disabilities, specifically cerebral palsy. She needs to have her wisdom teeth removed. …" @default.
• W2761010200 created "2017-10-20" @default.
• W2761010200 creator A5030653923 @default.
• W2761010200 creator A5069954036 @default.
• W2761010200 date "2016-04-01" @default.
• W2761010200 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2761010200 title "Petitioning for Protection: Without Repeal or Reform of Article 17A, Can Practitioners Maintain Ethical Guardianship Practices While Simultaneously Protecting the Rights of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities" @default.
• W2761010200 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2761010200 type Work @default.
• W2761010200 sameAs 2761010200 @default.
• W2761010200 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2761010200 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2761010200 hasAuthorship W2761010200A5030653923 @default.
• W2761010200 hasAuthorship W2761010200A5069954036 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C179576951 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C2777553895 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C2780808987 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C2780900520 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConcept C47867601 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C11171543 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C144024400 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C15744967 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C17319257 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C17744445 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C179576951 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C199539241 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C2777553895 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C2778272461 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C2780808987 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C2780900520 @default.
• W2761010200 hasConceptScore W2761010200C47867601 @default.
• W2761010200 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2761010200 hasLocation W27610102001 @default.
• W2761010200 hasOpenAccess W2761010200 @default.
• W2761010200 hasPrimaryLocation W27610102001 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W1484744277 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W1514464075 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W1544837666 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W1565548146 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W1728009577 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W2254698089 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W2300899189 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W2416978775 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W2777391424 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W2779998370 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W3016703399 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W3030711510 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W3122293731 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W3122346979 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W3123020968 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W3125092537 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W3125328686 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W323144319 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W634257014 @default.
• W2761010200 hasRelatedWork W74153454 @default.
• W2761010200 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W2761010200 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2761010200 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2761010200 magId "2761010200" @default.
• W2761010200 workType "article" @default.