FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2763463540> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2763463540 abstract "Resumo Objetivo: Analisar o uso das variaveis raca, cor e etnia em estudos epidemiologicos sobre populacoes brasileiras. Metodos: Trata-se de revisao sistematica conduzida na base PubMed, entre janeiro de 2000 e julho de 2010. Para o conjunto dos trabalhos revisados, foi aplicada uma ficha com questoes sobre seus objetivos e a relevância da classificacao etnico-racial em suas analises, caracteristicas socio-demograficas e aspectos da identificacao etnico-racial das populacoes investigadas, bem como o seguimento de recomendacoes quanto ao uso das classificacoes de raca, cor e etnia. Resultados: Dos 1.174 artigos identificados, 151 foram elegiveis para a revisao. Maiores proporcoes de cada um dos seguintes aspectos foram observadas nos artigos em que a identificacao etnico-racial ocupou papel central em suas analises – destes, 18% justificou o emprego das categorias, 16% considerou a classificacao etnico-racial como fluida e relativa ao contexto da producao dos dados, 65% descreveu o metodo da classificacao etnico-racial, 17% entendeu esta classificacao como medida de variacao genetica, 26% interpretou a variavel como fator de risco para o desfecho em questao, 47% considerou fatores socioeconomicos na interpretacao das desigualdades etnico-raciais e 27% incluiu tais fatores no ajuste de modelos estatisticos. Apenas dois estudos explicitaram o conceito, que embasou o uso da variavel etnico-racial. Conclusoes: Os estudos epidemiologicos nao seguem criterios minimos, estabelecidos para o uso da variavel etnico-racial, o que sugere que esta questao deve ser aperfeicoada urgentemente nas pesquisas em saude coletiva. Abstract Objective: To analyze the use of the variables race, color and ethnicity in epidemiologic studies, carried out with Brazilian populations. Methods: This is a systematic review, conducted in the PubMed bibliographic database, on papers published between January 2000 and July 2010. A data extraction form was used to obtain data from all individual studies, such as their objectives, the relevance of the racial/ethnic classification in their analyses, participants’ socio-demographic characteristics, including aspects related to the methods of racial classification, as well as the adherence to a set of recommendations on the use of race, color and ethnicity in biomedical publications. Results: After initially identifying 1,174 references, 151 were included in the review. Higher proportions of each of the following results were observed among papers in which the racial/ethnic classification was central to their analyses – of these, 18% justified the use of racial/ethnic categories, 16% regarded racial/ethnic classifications as context-dependent and fluid, 65% described the methods adopted for racial/ethnic classification, 17% took the racial/ethnic classification as a proxy for genetic variation, 26% considered such classification as a risk factor for health outcomes, 47% considered socio-economic factors in the interpretation of racial/ethnic inequalities in health and 27% adjusted these racial/ethnic disparities for socio-economic factors in their statistical models. Only two studies elucidated the concept underlying the use of race, color or ethnicity. Conclusions: Brazilian epidemiologic studies do not follow established criteria on the use of the racial/ethnic variable; this should be urgently improved in public health research." @default.
• W2763463540 created "2017-10-20" @default.
• W2763463540 creator A5000667068 @default.
• W2763463540 creator A5023343924 @default.
• W2763463540 creator A5076619980 @default.
• W2763463540 date "2012-06-22" @default.
• W2763463540 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2763463540 title "Raça, cor e etnia em estudos epidemiológicos sobre populações brasileiras: revisão sistemática na base PubMed. Race, color and ethnicity in epidemiologic studies carried out with Brazilian populations: systematic review on the PubMed database." @default.
• W2763463540 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2763463540 type Work @default.
• W2763463540 sameAs 2763463540 @default.
• W2763463540 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2763463540 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2763463540 hasAuthorship W2763463540A5000667068 @default.
• W2763463540 hasAuthorship W2763463540A5023343924 @default.
• W2763463540 hasAuthorship W2763463540A5076619980 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConcept C137403100 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConceptScore W2763463540C137403100 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConceptScore W2763463540C138885662 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConceptScore W2763463540C144024400 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConceptScore W2763463540C15708023 @default.
• W2763463540 hasConceptScore W2763463540C19165224 @default.
• W2763463540 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2763463540 hasLocation W27634635401 @default.
• W2763463540 hasOpenAccess W2763463540 @default.
• W2763463540 hasPrimaryLocation W27634635401 @default.
• W2763463540 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W2763463540 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2763463540 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2763463540 magId "2763463540" @default.
• W2763463540 workType "article" @default.