FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2765720213> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2765720213 endingPage "386" @default.
• W2765720213 startingPage "381" @default.
• W2765720213 abstract "Study objective Nonrebreather masks and bag-valve masks are used for preoxygenation before emergency intubation. Flush rate oxygen delivered with a nonrebreather mask is noninferior to bag-valve mask oxygen at 15 L/min. We seek to compare the nonrebreather mask with flush rate oxygen to a bag-valve mask with flush rate oxygen (with and without inspiratory assistance) and determine whether the efficacy of bag-valve mask with flush rate oxygen is compromised by a simulated mask leak. Methods We conducted 2 prospective studies in healthy, adult volunteers. All devices in both studies used flush rate oxygen, achieved by rotating the flowmeter dial counterclockwise until it could not be rotated farther, which delivered oxygen at 40 to 60 L/min. Study 1 compared preoxygenation with nonrebreather mask to bag-valve mask (modified with a one-way exhalation port) with and without a simulated mask leak. Study 2 compared nonrebreather mask to bag-valve mask with inspiratory assistance. The primary outcome was FeO2. For each comparison, we prespecified a noninferiority margin of FeO2 for the nonrebreather mask (compared with the bag-valve mask, bag-valve mask with mask leak, and bag-valve mask with assistance) of 10%. Results Thirty subjects were enrolled in study 1 and 27 subjects were enrolled in study 2. For study 1, mean FeO2 values for nonrebreather mask, bag-valve mask, and bag-valve mask with leak were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78% to 83%), 76% (95% CI 71% to 81%), and 30% (95% CI 26% to 35%), respectively. FeO2 for the nonrebreather mask was noninferior to the bag-valve mask at flush rate (difference 5%; 95% CI –1% to 10%). FeO2 was higher for the nonrebreather mask compared with the bag-valve mask with a simulated mask leak (difference 51%; 95% CI 46% to 55%). For study 2, mean FeO2 values for nonrebreather mask and bag-valve mask with assistance were 83% (95% CI 80% to 86%) and 77% (95% CI 73% to 80%), respectively. FeO2 for the nonrebreather mask was noninferior to the bag-valve mask with assistance at flush rate (difference 6%; 95% CI 3% to 10%). Conclusion With flush rate oxygen, the nonrebreather mask is noninferior to the bag-valve mask, with and without inspiratory assistance. Bag-valve mask performed poorly with a mask leak, even with flush rate oxygen. Flush rate oxygen with a nonrebreather mask is a reasonable default preoxygenation method in spontaneously breathing patients with no underlying respiratory pathology. Nonrebreather masks and bag-valve masks are used for preoxygenation before emergency intubation. Flush rate oxygen delivered with a nonrebreather mask is noninferior to bag-valve mask oxygen at 15 L/min. We seek to compare the nonrebreather mask with flush rate oxygen to a bag-valve mask with flush rate oxygen (with and without inspiratory assistance) and determine whether the efficacy of bag-valve mask with flush rate oxygen is compromised by a simulated mask leak. We conducted 2 prospective studies in healthy, adult volunteers. All devices in both studies used flush rate oxygen, achieved by rotating the flowmeter dial counterclockwise until it could not be rotated farther, which delivered oxygen at 40 to 60 L/min. Study 1 compared preoxygenation with nonrebreather mask to bag-valve mask (modified with a one-way exhalation port) with and without a simulated mask leak. Study 2 compared nonrebreather mask to bag-valve mask with inspiratory assistance. The primary outcome was FeO2. For each comparison, we prespecified a noninferiority margin of FeO2 for the nonrebreather mask (compared with the bag-valve mask, bag-valve mask with mask leak, and bag-valve mask with assistance) of 10%. Thirty subjects were enrolled in study 1 and 27 subjects were enrolled in study 2. For study 1, mean FeO2 values for nonrebreather mask, bag-valve mask, and bag-valve mask with leak were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78% to 83%), 76% (95% CI 71% to 81%), and 30% (95% CI 26% to 35%), respectively. FeO2 for the nonrebreather mask was noninferior to the bag-valve mask at flush rate (difference 5%; 95% CI –1% to 10%). FeO2 was higher for the nonrebreather mask compared with the bag-valve mask with a simulated mask leak (difference 51%; 95% CI 46% to 55%). For study 2, mean FeO2 values for nonrebreather mask and bag-valve mask with assistance were 83% (95% CI 80% to 86%) and 77% (95% CI 73% to 80%), respectively. FeO2 for the nonrebreather mask was noninferior to the bag-valve mask with assistance at flush rate (difference 6%; 95% CI 3% to 10%). With flush rate oxygen, the nonrebreather mask is noninferior to the bag-valve mask, with and without inspiratory assistance. Bag-valve mask performed poorly with a mask leak, even with flush rate oxygen. Flush rate oxygen with a nonrebreather mask is a reasonable default preoxygenation method in spontaneously breathing patients with no underlying respiratory pathology." @default.
• W2765720213 created "2017-11-10" @default.
• W2765720213 creator A5012251011 @default.
• W2765720213 creator A5023310280 @default.
• W2765720213 creator A5028104213 @default.
• W2765720213 creator A5035996807 @default.
• W2765720213 creator A5076491788 @default.
• W2765720213 creator A5085048710 @default.
• W2765720213 date "2018-03-01" @default.
• W2765720213 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2765720213 title "Preoxygenation With Flush Rate Oxygen: Comparing the Nonrebreather Mask With the Bag-Valve Mask" @default.
• W2765720213 cites W1578489208 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W1964366002 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W1965483819 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W1971999537 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2018043231 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2029933119 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2072663675 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2119925301 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2137386190 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2144567835 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2217865623 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2223300899 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2412354691 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2461570139 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2509255468 @default.
• W2765720213 cites W2745301896 @default.
• W2765720213 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.017" @default.
• W2765720213 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29089172" @default.
• W2765720213 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2765720213 type Work @default.
• W2765720213 sameAs 2765720213 @default.
• W2765720213 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2765720213 countsByYear W27657202132019 @default.
• W2765720213 countsByYear W27657202132020 @default.
• W2765720213 countsByYear W27657202132021 @default.
• W2765720213 countsByYear W27657202132022 @default.
• W2765720213 countsByYear W27657202132023 @default.
• W2765720213 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2765720213 hasAuthorship W2765720213A5012251011 @default.
• W2765720213 hasAuthorship W2765720213A5023310280 @default.
• W2765720213 hasAuthorship W2765720213A5028104213 @default.
• W2765720213 hasAuthorship W2765720213A5035996807 @default.
• W2765720213 hasAuthorship W2765720213A5076491788 @default.
• W2765720213 hasAuthorship W2765720213A5085048710 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C2779870758 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C2780378346 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C43396882 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConcept C87717796 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C127413603 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C141071460 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C2778716859 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C2779870758 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C2780378346 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C42219234 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C43396882 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C71924100 @default.
• W2765720213 hasConceptScore W2765720213C87717796 @default.
• W2765720213 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2765720213 hasLocation W27657202131 @default.
• W2765720213 hasLocation W27657202132 @default.
• W2765720213 hasOpenAccess W2765720213 @default.
• W2765720213 hasPrimaryLocation W27657202131 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W1975138601 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W2135478876 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W2281573991 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W2978774081 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W3028787224 @default.
• W2765720213 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2765720213 hasVolume "71" @default.
• W2765720213 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2765720213 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2765720213 magId "2765720213" @default.
• W2765720213 workType "article" @default.