FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2765791796> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2765791796 endingPage "702.e3" @default.
• W2765791796 startingPage "691" @default.
• W2765791796 abstract "Study objective The Verbal Numerical Rating Scale is the most commonly used self-report measure of pain intensity. It is unclear how the validity and reliability of the scale scores vary across children’s ages. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the scale for children presenting to the emergency department across a comprehensive spectrum of age. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of children aged 4 to 17 years. Children self-reported their pain intensity, using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale–Revised at 2 serial assessments. We evaluated convergent validity (strong validity defined as correlation coefficient ≥0.60), agreement (difference between concurrent Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale–Revised scores), known-groups validity (difference in score between children with painful versus nonpainful conditions), responsivity (decrease in score after analgesic administration), and reliability (test-retest at 2 serial assessments) in the total sample and subgroups based on age. Results We enrolled 760 children; 27 did not understand the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and were removed. Of the remainder, Pearson correlations were strong to very strong (0.62 to 0.96) in all years of age except 4 and 5 years, and agreement was strong for children aged 8 and older. Known-groups validity and responsivity were strong in all years of age. Reliability was strong in all age subgroups, including each year of age from 4 to 7 years. Conclusion Convergent validity, known-groups validity, responsivity, and reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale were strong for children aged 6 to 17 years. Convergent validity was not strong for children aged 4 and 5 years. Our findings support the use of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for most children aged 6 years and older, but not for those aged 4 and 5 years. The Verbal Numerical Rating Scale is the most commonly used self-report measure of pain intensity. It is unclear how the validity and reliability of the scale scores vary across children’s ages. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the scale for children presenting to the emergency department across a comprehensive spectrum of age. This was a cross-sectional study of children aged 4 to 17 years. Children self-reported their pain intensity, using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale–Revised at 2 serial assessments. We evaluated convergent validity (strong validity defined as correlation coefficient ≥0.60), agreement (difference between concurrent Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and Faces Pain Scale–Revised scores), known-groups validity (difference in score between children with painful versus nonpainful conditions), responsivity (decrease in score after analgesic administration), and reliability (test-retest at 2 serial assessments) in the total sample and subgroups based on age. We enrolled 760 children; 27 did not understand the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale and were removed. Of the remainder, Pearson correlations were strong to very strong (0.62 to 0.96) in all years of age except 4 and 5 years, and agreement was strong for children aged 8 and older. Known-groups validity and responsivity were strong in all years of age. Reliability was strong in all age subgroups, including each year of age from 4 to 7 years. Convergent validity, known-groups validity, responsivity, and reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale were strong for children aged 6 to 17 years. Convergent validity was not strong for children aged 4 and 5 years. Our findings support the use of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for most children aged 6 years and older, but not for those aged 4 and 5 years." @default.
• W2765791796 created "2017-11-10" @default.
• W2765791796 creator A5021911716 @default.
• W2765791796 creator A5074602978 @default.
• W2765791796 creator A5075063030 @default.
• W2765791796 creator A5087912778 @default.
• W2765791796 date "2018-06-01" @default.
• W2765791796 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2765791796 title "Validity and Reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for Children Aged 4 to 17 Years With Acute Pain" @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1519367790 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1895257458 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1966570957 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1968710559 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1969710428 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1974258253 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1975489503 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1979679118 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1980999663 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W1999683242 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2002738006 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2003065114 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2008941884 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2011103051 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2017869545 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2018883975 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2029662381 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2034849898 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2044895524 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2070903049 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2072062375 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2074211951 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2081706089 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2083355677 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2087559496 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2093354847 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2102260068 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2105786999 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2106978322 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2107153119 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2121868880 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2126047189 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2131764469 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2138261897 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2145158233 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2149174813 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2153925899 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2157461834 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2163196723 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2198287806 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2330921938 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2335696856 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2409771704 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W2507329416 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W3194956376 @default.
• W2765791796 cites W4239667827 @default.
• W2765791796 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.009" @default.
• W2765791796 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5920794" @default.
• W2765791796 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29107409" @default.
• W2765791796 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2765791796 type Work @default.
• W2765791796 sameAs 2765791796 @default.
• W2765791796 citedByCount "78" @default.
• W2765791796 countsByYear W27657917962018 @default.
• W2765791796 countsByYear W27657917962019 @default.
• W2765791796 countsByYear W27657917962020 @default.
• W2765791796 countsByYear W27657917962021 @default.
• W2765791796 countsByYear W27657917962022 @default.
• W2765791796 countsByYear W27657917962023 @default.
• W2765791796 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2765791796 hasAuthorship W2765791796A5021911716 @default.
• W2765791796 hasAuthorship W2765791796A5074602978 @default.
• W2765791796 hasAuthorship W2765791796A5075063030 @default.
• W2765791796 hasAuthorship W2765791796A5087912778 @default.
• W2765791796 hasBestOaLocation W27657917961 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C121244757 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C182050348 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C198999979 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C3018868096 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C121244757 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C121332964 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C138496976 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C15744967 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C171606756 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C182050348 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C1862650 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C198999979 @default.
• W2765791796 hasConceptScore W2765791796C2778755073 @default.

• next