Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2766099499> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 64 of
64
with 100 items per page.
- W2766099499 endingPage "A730" @default.
- W2766099499 startingPage "A730" @default.
- W2766099499 abstract "Embase is one of the most commonly searched bibliographic databases when undertaking systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. Using a combination of text searching and index searching is accepted best practice when designing Embase search strategies. As the number of Emtree index terms assigned to each Embase record has increased over time, there has been a corresponding increase in overall search result numbers and, therefore, the size of the workload for reviewers. The objective of this research was to investigate whether focusing Emtree indexing terms using the ‘restrict to focus’ function, so that only those articles where the index term is key to that article are retrieved, could reduce the number of records for screening without loss of included studies. Embase searches conducted in three selected clinical reviews undertaken by the review team were retrospectively compared with searches in which the Emtree terms were focused. The records retrieved by the focused Emtree searches were checked to see what proportion of included studies identified by the original unfocused search strategy were retrieved. The subjects of reviews investigated were treatments for invasive fungal infections, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The data collected was analysed to identify total results with and without focusing Emtree terms, and to calculate the yield of included records. The focused searches retrieved 100% of the included papers in each review but results retrieved to screen were reduced by up to 30%. Focusing Emtree terms can potentially reduce screening burden in clinical systematic reviews without lowering retrieval of relevant records. Reducing the number of results in Embase searches without a loss of sensitivity could improve efficiency by reducing time spent and costs when undertaking systematic reviews." @default.
- W2766099499 created "2017-11-10" @default.
- W2766099499 creator A5014229915 @default.
- W2766099499 creator A5041948559 @default.
- W2766099499 creator A5056814972 @default.
- W2766099499 date "2017-10-01" @default.
- W2766099499 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2766099499 title "Could Embase Emtree Index Search Terms Be Focused To Reduce Numbers To Screen In Clinical Systematic Reviews?" @default.
- W2766099499 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.1987" @default.
- W2766099499 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2766099499 type Work @default.
- W2766099499 sameAs 2766099499 @default.
- W2766099499 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2766099499 countsByYear W27660994992019 @default.
- W2766099499 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2766099499 hasAuthorship W2766099499A5014229915 @default.
- W2766099499 hasAuthorship W2766099499A5041948559 @default.
- W2766099499 hasAuthorship W2766099499A5056814972 @default.
- W2766099499 hasBestOaLocation W27660994991 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C2777382242 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConcept C75165309 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C111919701 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C136764020 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C17744445 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C189708586 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C199539241 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C23123220 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C2777382242 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C2778476105 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C2779473830 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C41008148 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C71924100 @default.
- W2766099499 hasConceptScore W2766099499C75165309 @default.
- W2766099499 hasIssue "9" @default.
- W2766099499 hasLocation W27660994991 @default.
- W2766099499 hasOpenAccess W2766099499 @default.
- W2766099499 hasPrimaryLocation W27660994991 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W173202579 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W1894595501 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W2023010868 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W2137587553 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W2160484851 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W2393932274 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W2898868367 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2766099499 hasRelatedWork W3140834074 @default.
- W2766099499 hasVolume "20" @default.
- W2766099499 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2766099499 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2766099499 magId "2766099499" @default.
- W2766099499 workType "article" @default.