FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2766301045> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2766301045 abstract "The experiments described here were aimed at characterizing people's aesthetic responses to color pairs, both in terms of which colors people prefer in combination and how the spatial organization of the component colors influences pair preference. Previous studies of preference for and harmony of color combinations have produced conflicting results. For example, some claim that harmony increases with hue similarity, whereas others claim that it decreases. In the first set of experiments, we argue that such conflicting results are resolved by distinguishing among three types of judgments about color pairs: (a) preference for the pair as a whole, (b) harmony of the pair as a whole, and (c) preference for its figural color when viewed against its colored background. Empirical support for this distinction shows that pair preference and harmony both increase as hue similarity increases, but preference relies more strongly on component color preference and lightness contrast. Although pairs with highly contrastive hues are generally judged to be neither preferable nor harmonious, figural color preference ratings increase as hue contrast with the background increases. The present results thus refine and clarify some of the best-known and most contentious claims of color theorists. In the second set of experiments, we investigated how spatial organization influences color-pair preference asymmetries: differential preference for one color pair over another when the pairs contain the same colors in opposite spatial configurations. We found robust preference asymmetries, in which participants strongly preferred pairs with yellower, lighter figures on bluer, darker grounds. We also investigated which spatial factors influence these preference asymmetries. Relative area of the two component regions is clearly important, and relative surface-based area (i.e., after amodal figure-ground completion) is more influential than relative image-based area. Surroundedness is not required, because yellowness-blueness effects were comparable for figure-ground pairs in which the figure was surrounded by the ground and for mosaic arrangements in which the regions were adjacent and separated by a gap). Lightness-darkness effects, however, were in the opposite direction for figure-ground versus mosaic organizations: people prefer figure-ground organizations in which the smaller regions are lighter, but prefer mosaic organizations in which the smaller regions are darker. We provide possible phenomenological and ecological explanations for the reported results." @default.
• W2766301045 created "2017-11-10" @default.
• W2766301045 creator A5050640461 @default.
• W2766301045 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2766301045 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2766301045 title "The Aesthetics of Color Combinations - eScholarship" @default.
• W2766301045 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2766301045 type Work @default.
• W2766301045 sameAs 2766301045 @default.
• W2766301045 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2766301045 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2766301045 hasAuthorship W2766301045A5050640461 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C126537357 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C2776453491 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C2776502983 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C61674017 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C105795698 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C120665830 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C121332964 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C126537357 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C154945302 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C15744967 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C2776453491 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C2776502983 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C2781249084 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C33923547 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C41008148 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C61674017 @default.
• W2766301045 hasConceptScore W2766301045C77805123 @default.
• W2766301045 hasLocation W27663010451 @default.
• W2766301045 hasOpenAccess W2766301045 @default.
• W2766301045 hasPrimaryLocation W27663010451 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W1988875448 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2002359923 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2004353240 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2006406833 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2032875546 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2061922986 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2074542251 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2079642080 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2084278635 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2088521627 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2108930731 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2116389385 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2198845042 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2322780935 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2335552851 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W2952814606 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W3082410598 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W3182212182 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W48771649 @default.
• W2766301045 hasRelatedWork W631303480 @default.
• W2766301045 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2766301045 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2766301045 magId "2766301045" @default.
• W2766301045 workType "article" @default.