Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2766649103> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2766649103 abstract "This study is intended to compare dose-volume parameters evaluated using different forward planning- optimization techniques, involving two applicator systems in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. It looks for the best applicator-optimization combination to fulfill recommended dose-volume objectives in different high-dose-rate (HDR) fractionation schedules.We used tandem-ring and Fletcher-style tandem-ovoid applicator in same patients in two fractions of brachytherapy. Six plans were generated for each patient utilizing 3 forward optimization techniques for each applicator used: equal dwell weight/times ('no optimization'), 'manual dwell weight/times', and 'graphical'. Plans were normalized to left point A and dose of 8 Gy was prescribed. Dose volume and dose point parameters were compared.Without graphical optimization, maximum width and thickness of volume enclosed by 100% isodose line, dose to 90%, and 100% of clinical target volume (CTV); minimum, maximum, median, and average dose to both rectum and bladder are significantly higher with Fletcher applicator. Even if it is done, dose to both points B, minimum dose to CTV, and treatment time; dose to 2 cc (D2cc) rectum and rectal point etc.; D2cc, minimum, maximum, median, and average dose to sigmoid colon; D2cc of bladder remain significantly higher with this applicator. Dose to bladder point is similar (p > 0.05) between two applicators, after all optimization techniques.Fletcher applicator generates higher dose to both CTV and organs at risk (2 cc volumes) after all optimization techniques. Dose restriction to rectum is possible using graphical optimization only during selected HDR fractionation schedules. Bladder always receives dose higher than recommended, and 2 cc sigmoid colon always gets permissible dose. Contrarily, graphical optimization with ring applicators fulfills all dose volume objectives in all HDR fractionations practiced." @default.
- W2766649103 created "2017-11-10" @default.
- W2766649103 creator A5059720016 @default.
- W2766649103 creator A5061074436 @default.
- W2766649103 creator A5062179912 @default.
- W2766649103 creator A5069045347 @default.
- W2766649103 creator A5070622294 @default.
- W2766649103 date "2017-01-01" @default.
- W2766649103 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2766649103 title "Comparison of dose volume parameters evaluated using three forward planning – optimization techniques in cervical cancer brachytherapy involving two applicators" @default.
- W2766649103 cites W1965440484 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W1977479761 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W1982824946 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W1999267929 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2026312236 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2028679169 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2028766220 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2050280798 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2052026313 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2065574271 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2085917352 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2088715070 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2102096905 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2127241882 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2131860931 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2157372207 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2398625727 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2479103426 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2550255866 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2559509366 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W2917837889 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W3025386046 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W630930427 @default.
- W2766649103 cites W955234137 @default.
- W2766649103 doi "https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2017.70677" @default.
- W2766649103 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5705826" @default.
- W2766649103 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29204164" @default.
- W2766649103 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W2766649103 type Work @default.
- W2766649103 sameAs 2766649103 @default.
- W2766649103 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W2766649103 countsByYear W27666491032018 @default.
- W2766649103 countsByYear W27666491032019 @default.
- W2766649103 countsByYear W27666491032020 @default.
- W2766649103 countsByYear W27666491032021 @default.
- W2766649103 countsByYear W27666491032022 @default.
- W2766649103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2766649103 hasAuthorship W2766649103A5059720016 @default.
- W2766649103 hasAuthorship W2766649103A5061074436 @default.
- W2766649103 hasAuthorship W2766649103A5062179912 @default.
- W2766649103 hasAuthorship W2766649103A5069045347 @default.
- W2766649103 hasAuthorship W2766649103A5070622294 @default.
- W2766649103 hasBestOaLocation W27666491031 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C151637689 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C20556612 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C2776017024 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C2777416452 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C2778220009 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C2781074409 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C121332964 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C121608353 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C126322002 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C126838900 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C136229726 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C141071460 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C151637689 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C201645570 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C20556612 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C2776017024 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C2777416452 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C2778220009 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C2781074409 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C2989005 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C509974204 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C62520636 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C70410870 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C71924100 @default.
- W2766649103 hasConceptScore W2766649103C75088862 @default.
- W2766649103 hasLocation W27666491031 @default.
- W2766649103 hasLocation W27666491032 @default.
- W2766649103 hasLocation W27666491033 @default.
- W2766649103 hasLocation W27666491034 @default.
- W2766649103 hasOpenAccess W2766649103 @default.
- W2766649103 hasPrimaryLocation W27666491031 @default.
- W2766649103 hasRelatedWork W2000740580 @default.
- W2766649103 hasRelatedWork W2005517724 @default.
- W2766649103 hasRelatedWork W2008560557 @default.