FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2766886723> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2766886723 abstract "Are Abstract Concepts Structured via More Concrete Concepts? John L. M. Dennis (johnlmdennis@mail.utexas.edu) The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology 1 University Station A8000, Austin TX, 78712-0187 Arthur B. Markman (markman@psy.utexas.edu) The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology 1 University Station A8000, Austin TX, 78712-0187 Introduction Cognitive Scientists have long debated the connection between abstract concepts like happiness, integrity, and time, and experiential concepts, like moving, eating, and physical space (Barsalou, 1999; Clark, 2001; Prinz, 2002). In this poster we focus on space/time metaphors, which have been the subject of much previous research on the role of metaphor in conceptual understanding (Boroditsky, 2000; McGlone & Harding, 1998) In particular, there are two distinct metaphors in English for describing the passage of time: the ego-moving and time-moving metaphors. In this poster, we point out that these space/time metaphors have an implied agency within the grammar of the metaphors. This implicit agency is to be found in all schemas in which these metaphors appear, and so implicit agency is confounded with the spatial metaphor. We present a study demonstrating that the degree to which the concept of agency or passivity is active influences the interpretation of temporal metaphors. meeting has been moved forward two days. What day is the meeting now that it has been rescheduled? Procedure Subjects were run solely on Wednesdays, in order to maintain the same reference point for answering the temporally ambiguous question. Subjects completed the three pages of scrambled sentences in about 20 minutes. Only the page with the target question was presented for those in the control group. Results Experiment As predicted, for the “I” prime 12/42 of the subjects selected Friday – the ego-moving frame of reference, while for the “me” prime 25/42 selected Monday – the time-moving frame of reference. A Pearson Chi-Square confirmed that this difference was significant, (1, N=84) = 8.163, P < .01. Control participants who had not participated in the sentence unscrambling primes were about evenly split between Monday (19/42) and Friday. Acknowledgments Participants 84 University of Texas at Austin undergraduates participated in this study for partial course credit. Materials This research was supported by NIDA grant R21 DA015211-01A1. References In order to prime subjects we asked them to unscramble sentences, where the sentences were constructed with either the first person subject pronoun, “I” or the first person object pronoun, “me”. We hypothesized that the grammatical subject/object of the SvO sentence construction would prime representations of agency for those subjects who unscrambled “I” sentences and passivity for those subjects who unscrambled “me” sentences. Design Barsalou, L. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, Clark, A. (2001). Reasons, robots and the extended mind. Mind & Language, 16, 121-145. McGlone, M. & Harding, J. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: the role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1211-1223. Prinz, J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. The experiment design was between subjects, with subjects either running in either the “I” or the “me” priming condition. Immediately following the sentence unscrambling primes subjects were asked to answer the temporally ambiguous target question: Next Wednesday's" @default.
• W2766886723 created "2017-11-10" @default.
• W2766886723 creator A5046157332 @default.
• W2766886723 creator A5063119181 @default.
• W2766886723 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2766886723 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2766886723 title "Are Abstract Concepts Structured via More Concrete Concepts" @default.
• W2766886723 cites W1692844732 @default.
• W2766886723 cites W1968133283 @default.
• W2766886723 cites W2019167053 @default.
• W2766886723 cites W2072729203 @default.
• W2766886723 cites W2150375089 @default.
• W2766886723 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2766886723 type Work @default.
• W2766886723 sameAs 2766886723 @default.
• W2766886723 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2766886723 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2766886723 hasAuthorship W2766886723A5046157332 @default.
• W2766886723 hasAuthorship W2766886723A5063119181 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C2776402256 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C2778311575 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C37228920 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C111472728 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C138885662 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C145420912 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C15744967 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C180747234 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C188147891 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C2776402256 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C2778311575 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C37228920 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C41895202 @default.
• W2766886723 hasConceptScore W2766886723C77805123 @default.
• W2766886723 hasIssue "27" @default.
• W2766886723 hasLocation W27668867231 @default.
• W2766886723 hasOpenAccess W2766886723 @default.
• W2766886723 hasPrimaryLocation W27668867231 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W131993176 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W132484531 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W1917342115 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W1991404680 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2141466226 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2186238142 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2292711447 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2487287992 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2765971732 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2767252324 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2767489373 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2767919623 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2771684028 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W2779998091 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W384943376 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W410168206 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W629131444 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W70045063 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W855654792 @default.
• W2766886723 hasRelatedWork W141311918 @default.
• W2766886723 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2766886723 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2766886723 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2766886723 magId "2766886723" @default.
• W2766886723 workType "article" @default.