FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2767137918> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2767137918 endingPage "317e" @default.
• W2767137918 startingPage "316e" @default.
• W2767137918 abstract "Sir: I agree with the authors1 that the subfascial plane2–4 provides excellent coverage of the implant and avoids using the retromuscular plane preserving the pectoralis major. However, I object to the writers’ contradictory and insufficient justifications provided for their choice of round implants. The first incongruity in the article is that the authors claimed to have used anatomical implants in 70.52 percent of their patients from December of 2006 until the end of 2013. However, they have resorted to use of these implants in only 9 percent of their cases since 2014. The reasons why they stopped using anatomical implants, if the index of rotation they published within their statistics is 0.64 percent, are not very clear though. Any other factors directly leading to unwanted results postoperatively were not described either. Second, the pectoral fascia is a structure that allows excellent coverage of the upper pole and also camouflage of the implants borders, whether round or anatomical,5 because the fascia attached to the pectoralis major muscle pulls the muscle and avoids the visibility of the prosthesis edges; for this reason, I question the use of the fat graft, which was placed at the level of the upper pole in 89.7 percent of cases. It is necessary to emphasize that once this technique has been adopted, it is vital to take into account the individual variability of reabsorption, the variables within the same patient with asymmetric reabsorption, and the durability of the fat graft requiring a second fat injection. Third, the need for decubitus modifications for the removal of adipose tissue, with the consequent contamination of the surgical fields, increases the possibility of infection. Although fat placement is performed in a subcutaneous plane, the minimal inflammation or erythema of the mammary area can result in an infection, with the later removal of the implant. Such a position may also cause a subclinical infection, leading to the formation of a capsular contracture. Finally, it is worrying that although the fat is reabsorbed over the course of years, which together with the round implants has had a decisive role in the outcome of this practice since 2014, the long-term results will be artificial or require a new operation to place more fat graft. In my private practice, I have used the subfascial plane for 928 patients from November of 2001 to December of 2016. Our routine is (1) sedation, (2) intercostal and pectoral block with the aid of ultrasound, (3) added to a superwet infiltration of the breast tissue facilitating the lifting of the pectoral fascia in the upper pole and the fascia of the rectus muscle and serrate level of the inferior pole by hydrodissection, and (4) providing total coverage of the implant by the fascia of the mentioned muscles. Since 2009, 70 percent of the implants I have used in primary breast augmentation have been anatomical devices,6,7 bringing us satisfactory results in patients older than 35 years who seek more natural results in implants that are not extremely large. DISCLOSURE The author has no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication. Javier Vera Cucchairo, M.D.Clinic Aesthetic SurgerySalta, Argentina[email protected]" @default.
• W2767137918 created "2017-11-10" @default.
• W2767137918 creator A5041886395 @default.
• W2767137918 date "2018-02-01" @default.
• W2767137918 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2767137918 title "Subfascial Primary Breast Augmentation with Fat Grafting" @default.
• W2767137918 cites W1759788859 @default.
• W2767137918 cites W2001218371 @default.
• W2767137918 cites W2054638990 @default.
• W2767137918 cites W2074019087 @default.
• W2767137918 cites W2100859625 @default.
• W2767137918 cites W2394688325 @default.
• W2767137918 cites W2608595282 @default.
• W2767137918 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004053" @default.
• W2767137918 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29068887" @default.
• W2767137918 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2767137918 type Work @default.
• W2767137918 sameAs 2767137918 @default.
• W2767137918 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2767137918 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2767137918 hasAuthorship W2767137918A5041886395 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C195735259 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C2775951664 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C2781001896 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C2781017814 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C2781223772 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C2909720742 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C121608353 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C126322002 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C141071460 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C195735259 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C199343813 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C2775951664 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C2778715743 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C2781001896 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C2781017814 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C2781223772 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C2781411149 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C2909720742 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C530470458 @default.
• W2767137918 hasConceptScore W2767137918C71924100 @default.
• W2767137918 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2767137918 hasLocation W27671379181 @default.
• W2767137918 hasOpenAccess W2767137918 @default.
• W2767137918 hasPrimaryLocation W27671379181 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W1985415476 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W1994803320 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W2018371772 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W2093060604 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W2158527337 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W2255197361 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W2334105964 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W2767137918 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W4250929896 @default.
• W2767137918 hasRelatedWork W4377046829 @default.
• W2767137918 hasVolume "141" @default.
• W2767137918 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2767137918 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2767137918 magId "2767137918" @default.
• W2767137918 workType "article" @default.