FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2767252324> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2767252324 abstract "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Temporal Metaphors Evangelia G. Chrysikou (evangelg@psych.upenn.edu) Department of Psychology, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania 3720 Walnut St., Solomon Lab, Room B51, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA Christopher H. Ramey (cramey@flsouthern.edu) Department of Psychology, Florida Southern College 111 Lake Hollingsworth Drive, Lakeland, FL 33801 USA Keywords: conceptual metaphors; time metaphors; language and thought; embodiment. Priming Temporal Perspective The abstract concept of time has been described with respect to two space-to-time metaphorical systems: the ego-moving (EM) metaphor and the time-moving (TM) metaphor (e.g., Boroditsky, 2000; Clark, 1973; Gentner, 2001; Gentner, Imai, & Boroditsky, 2002; Lakoff & Johnson, 1980; McGlone & Harding, 1998; Nunez, Motz, & Teuscher, 2006). In the EM metaphor the person moves toward a stationary event, whereas in the TM metaphor an event moves toward a stationary person. Recent research has demonstrated that primes of real, imagined, or fictive motion can bias responses to an ambiguous question about a future temporal event (Alloway, Ramscar, & Corley, 2001; Boroditsky, 2000; Boroditsky & Ramscar, 2002; Matlock, Ramscar, & Boroditsky, 2005). Specifically, if one believes that next Wednesday’s meeting has been moved forward two days, priming by stimuli or experiences that are TM- or EM- consistent biases participants’ responses to an earlier (Monday) or a later (Friday) date, respectively. The Influence of Additional Factors in the Adoption of Temporal Perspective Even though previous studies provide support for spatial- domain-to-temporal-domain mappings, they do not address whether other personally-relevant factors may be implicated in and influence the adoption of temporal perspective. In particular, the present paper discusses ways in which a series of factors that are related to one’s personal regard for a future event in a disambiguation paradigm may critically influence and significantly moderate the adoption of a particular TM or EM time metaphor. The evidence from our lab suggests that participants’ earlier or later responses to an ambiguous question regarding the rescheduling of a future event may be biased by the event’s valence and the magnitude of the event’s rescheduling. Thus, the present paper argues that the adoption of time metaphors may be decisively influenced by variables that exist at the person-level, beyond any experimentally introduced spatial primes that have been repeatedly reported in the literature. That is, one is not indifferent toward the timing of an event that may affect their lives in some way. Thus, the perception of time may be determined by a complex interaction of an array of variables. This possibility may have significant implications for research on time metaphors specifically and the relation between language and thought generally, insofar as it would suggest that subjective factors can modulate one’s perception of time and they may interact with other personality and spatial variables. References Alloway, T. P., Ramscar, M., & Corley, M. (2001). The roles of thought and experience in the understanding of spatio-temporal metaphors. In Proceedings of the Twenty- third Annual Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press. Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In M. Gatis (Ed.), Spatial schemas in abstract thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space  time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Matlock, T., Ramscar, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2005). On the experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29, 655-664. McGlone, M. S., & Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Nunez, R. E., Motz, B. A., & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time- reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 133-146." @default.
• W2767252324 created "2017-11-17" @default.
• W2767252324 creator A5019916770 @default.
• W2767252324 creator A5066122941 @default.
• W2767252324 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2767252324 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2767252324 title "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Temporal Metaphors" @default.
• W2767252324 cites W1520020354 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W1652849165 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W1968133283 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W2019167053 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W2047712852 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W2052417512 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W2105136061 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W2126284541 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W2134968220 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W2767504122 @default.
• W2767252324 cites W569907279 @default.
• W2767252324 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2767252324 type Work @default.
• W2767252324 sameAs 2767252324 @default.
• W2767252324 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2767252324 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2767252324 hasAuthorship W2767252324A5019916770 @default.
• W2767252324 hasAuthorship W2767252324A5066122941 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C100701293 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C2776402256 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C2778311575 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C2779662365 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C81444415 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C100701293 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C121332964 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C12713177 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C138885662 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C142362112 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C153349607 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C15744967 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C169760540 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C169900460 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C180747234 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C188147891 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C2776402256 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C2778311575 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C2779662365 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C41895202 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C59822182 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C62520636 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C81444415 @default.
• W2767252324 hasConceptScore W2767252324C86803240 @default.
• W2767252324 hasIssue "29" @default.
• W2767252324 hasLocation W27672523241 @default.
• W2767252324 hasOpenAccess W2767252324 @default.
• W2767252324 hasPrimaryLocation W27672523241 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W1160988394 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W1527556533 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W1544596703 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W1545481886 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W1589373625 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W1597919739 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W168501255 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W2487287992 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W2592194735 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W2765262150 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W2765971732 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W2766886723 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W2767489373 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W2771684028 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W2779998091 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W410168206 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W578861217 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W582491037 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W595443564 @default.
• W2767252324 hasRelatedWork W807345166 @default.
• W2767252324 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2767252324 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2767252324 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2767252324 magId "2767252324" @default.
• W2767252324 workType "article" @default.