FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2767498462> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2767498462 abstract "Although the FTC is well-staffed with highly skilled economists, its approach to data security is disappointingly light on economic analysis. The unfortunate result of this lacuna is an approach to these complex issues lacking in analytical rigor and the humility borne of analysis grounded in sound economics. In particular, the Commission’s “reasonableness” approach to assessing whether data security practices are unfair under Section 5 of the FTC Act lacks all but the most superficial trappings of the well-established law and economics of torts, from which the concept is borrowed. In actuality, however, the Commission’s manufactured “reasonableness” standard — which, as its name suggests, purports to evaluate data security practices under a negligence-like framework — actually amounts in effect to a rule of strict liability for any company that collects personally identifiable data. This is manifestly not what Section 5 intends. In its recent LabMD opinion, the Commission describes its approach as “cost-benefit analysis.” But simply listing out (some) costs and benefits is not the same thing as analyzing them. Recognizing that tradeoffs exist is a good start, but it is not a sufficient end, and “reasonableness” — if it is to be anything other than the mercurial preferences of three FTC commissioners — must contain analytical content. Persistent and unyielding uncertainty over the contours of the FTC's data security standard means that companies may be required to accept the reality that, no matter what they do short of the extremes, liability is possible. Worse, there is no way reliably to judge whether conduct (short of obvious fringe cases) is even likely to increase liability risk. The FTC’s recent LabMD case highlights the scope of the problem and the lack of economic analytical rigor endemic to the FTC’s purported data security standard. To be sure, other factors also contribute to the lack of certainty and sufficient rigor, (i.e., matters of process at the agency), but at root sits a “standardless” standard, masquerading as an economic framework. This paper explores these defects, paying particular attention to the FTC’s decision in LabMD and subsequent district court proceedings in the case." @default.
• W2767498462 created "2017-11-17" @default.
• W2767498462 creator A5016496508 @default.
• W2767498462 creator A5057676636 @default.
• W2767498462 date "2017-08-31" @default.
• W2767498462 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2767498462 title "When 'Reasonable' Isn't: The FTC's Standard-Less Data Security Standard" @default.
• W2767498462 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2767498462 type Work @default.
• W2767498462 sameAs 2767498462 @default.
• W2767498462 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2767498462 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2767498462 hasAuthorship W2767498462A5016496508 @default.
• W2767498462 hasAuthorship W2767498462A5057676636 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConcept C2777834853 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C121955636 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C144133560 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C162118730 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C162324750 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C17744445 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C190253527 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C199539241 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C2776034101 @default.
• W2767498462 hasConceptScore W2767498462C2777834853 @default.
• W2767498462 hasOpenAccess W2767498462 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W138178976 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W1508582973 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W1537800275 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W1553853742 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W1988786173 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W208356330 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W2269232696 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W2601207274 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W2783762173 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W2909365569 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W2993674443 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W3022129043 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W3122539648 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W3123669405 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W3124272193 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W3124315888 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W3124674117 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W3125557048 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W3130635892 @default.
• W2767498462 hasRelatedWork W829689891 @default.
• W2767498462 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2767498462 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2767498462 magId "2767498462" @default.
• W2767498462 workType "article" @default.