FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2767847494> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2767847494 abstract "While exploratory factor analysis (EFA) provides a more realistic presentation of the data with the allowance of item cross-loadings, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) includes many methodological advances that the former does not. To create a synergy of the two, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) was proposed as an alternative solution, incorporating the advantages of EFA and CFA. The present investigation is thus an illustrative demonstration of the applicability and flexibility of ESEM. To achieve this goal, we compared CFA and ESEM models, then thoroughly tested measurement invariance and differential item functioning through multiple-indicators-multiple-causes (MIMIC) models on the Passion Scale, the only measure of the Dualistic Model of Passion which differentiates between harmonious and obsessive forms of passion. Moreover, a hybrid model was also created to overcome the drawbacks of the two methods. Analyses of the first large community sample (N = 7,466; 67.7% females; Mage = 26.01) revealed that the superiority of the ESEM model relative to CFA in terms of improved goodness-of-fit and less correlated factors, while at the same time retaining the high definition of the factors. However, this fit was only achieved with the inclusion of three correlated uniquenesses, two of which appeared in previous studies and one of which was specific to the current investigation. These findings were replicated on a second, comprehensive sample (N = 504; 51.8% females; Mage = 39.59). After combining the two samples, complete measurement invariance (factor loadings, factor correlations, item uniquenesses, item intercepts, and latent means) was achieved across gender and partial invariance across age groups and their combination. Only one item intercept was non-invariant across both multigroup and MIMIC approaches, an observation that was further corroborated by the hybrid model. While obsessive passion showed a slight decline in the hybrid model, harmonious passion did not. Overall, the ESEM framework is a viable alternative of CFA that could be used and even extended to address substantially important questions and researchers should systematically compare these two approaches to identify the most suitable one." @default.
• W2767847494 created "2017-11-17" @default.
• W2767847494 creator A5010150017 @default.
• W2767847494 creator A5016285670 @default.
• W2767847494 creator A5037130865 @default.
• W2767847494 creator A5065358502 @default.
• W2767847494 date "2017-11-07" @default.
• W2767847494 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2767847494 title "An Illustration of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) Framework on the Passion Scale" @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1588466400 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1890637791 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1899874729 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1957962919 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1963742443 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1970325005 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1970874781 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1976038037 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1985442257 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W1998446890 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2002538709 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2005532382 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2011057514 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2014659263 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2025781576 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2025929695 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2029970799 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2030741364 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2034108143 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2040890982 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2052729098 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2058890455 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2071666535 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2073323972 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2082342698 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2083282455 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2089871805 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2098563832 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2106337441 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2108096958 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2110740376 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2117183956 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2129375743 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2130653485 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2133437912 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2133919474 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2135799338 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2144487201 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2147377599 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2147981382 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2152225530 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2155022159 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2156702515 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2157335584 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2165780129 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2202154805 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2243985845 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2344398625 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2403516908 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2420991929 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2508466548 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2509084970 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2547732142 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2560193284 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2564641220 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2611142313 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2733060449 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2795656446 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2902999784 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W4231367450 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W4236300553 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W4243073173 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W594590477 @default.
• W2767847494 cites W2011401817 @default.
• W2767847494 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01968" @default.
• W2767847494 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5681952" @default.
• W2767847494 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29163325" @default.
• W2767847494 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2767847494 type Work @default.
• W2767847494 sameAs 2767847494 @default.
• W2767847494 citedByCount "68" @default.
• W2767847494 countsByYear W27678474942017 @default.
• W2767847494 countsByYear W27678474942018 @default.
• W2767847494 countsByYear W27678474942019 @default.
• W2767847494 countsByYear W27678474942020 @default.
• W2767847494 countsByYear W27678474942021 @default.
• W2767847494 countsByYear W27678474942022 @default.
• W2767847494 countsByYear W27678474942023 @default.
• W2767847494 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2767847494 hasAuthorship W2767847494A5010150017 @default.
• W2767847494 hasAuthorship W2767847494A5016285670 @default.
• W2767847494 hasAuthorship W2767847494A5037130865 @default.
• W2767847494 hasAuthorship W2767847494A5065358502 @default.
• W2767847494 hasBestOaLocation W27678474941 @default.
• W2767847494 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2767847494 hasConcept C10879293 @default.
• W2767847494 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2767847494 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2767847494 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2767847494 hasConcept C132480984 @default.
• W2767847494 hasConcept C15744967 @default.

• next