FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2767947994> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2767947994 abstract "Watch the VIDEO here.Peer review has been a cornerstone of science since the first scientific journals started in the middle of 17th century. It has since evolved from a case by case and non standardized process to a more regulated and organized undertaking. The period at which peer review entered its new phase is the Second World War and the extraordinary boom of scientific output that resulted from the cold war. All this output had to have a receptacle (scientific journals) but also had to be selected due to the big amount of data produced. That is when peer review became unanimously and, to some extent, uniformly implemented. It also became the unavoidable door leading to a number of advantages all researchers are looking for (promotions, funding, prize, etc.).That’s when the human component intervened and made the process a rather biased process subject to all kinds of critics. One of the main (if not the main) problem is the secrecy in which the process is undertaken and that has led to all kind of iniquitous, unjust and sometimes bizarre decisions. The process tried to inject some kind of openness (going from blind to double blind peer reviewing for example) with little results. The 90’s of the last century saw the Internet slowly becoming more and more used in everyday life and, more importantly, in the scientific and academic research. With all the problems besetting peer review ,Internet’s openness seemed as the best cure to all the grievance peer review elicited. Among the most revolutionary experiences, Faculty of 1000 (F 1000), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (A.C.P.), Journal of Medical Internet Research (J.M.I.R.), British Medical Journal? Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence ( ETAI) and Biology Direct have introduced new ways to undertake peer review that have somehow alleviated the numerous critics. With Research Ideas Outcomes (RIO), the process enters a new era of openness as its two stages are completely open: the pre submission peer review (part 1) in which the submitter is reviewed before submission by a colleague and could even ask colleagues to help write his proposal and then open post-publication peer-review (part 2) in which the process is even more open as authors could decide what reviews are published, when and also decide to ask for an in house classic type of review done exclusively by peer reviewers from RIO or let the whole community implement a Post Publication Peer Review that could putatively last as long as the article is on the system. All the process is open in all its steps and allows novelty, among others, to recognize namely reviewers’ work, a task they have so far anonymously and without any reward of any kind. This proposal will explain in details the process and try to understand the (r)evolution this kind of process introduces to the making of science through transparency in a stage of science that has been known to be utterly secretive." @default.
• W2767947994 created "2017-11-17" @default.
• W2767947994 creator A5004646314 @default.
• W2767947994 date "2017-11-08" @default.
• W2767947994 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2767947994 title "Research Ideas and Outcomes journal (R.I.O.): A novel way to make science" @default.
• W2767947994 doi "https://doi.org/10.7557/5.4244" @default.
• W2767947994 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2767947994 type Work @default.
• W2767947994 sameAs 2767947994 @default.
• W2767947994 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2767947994 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2767947994 hasAuthorship W2767947994A5004646314 @default.
• W2767947994 hasBestOaLocation W27679479941 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C2777483011 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C2780616401 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C84976871 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C110875604 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C136764020 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C138368954 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C144024400 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C15744967 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C166957645 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C17744445 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C199539241 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C2777483011 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C2777855551 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C2780616401 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C29595303 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C39549134 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C41008148 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C77805123 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C84976871 @default.
• W2767947994 hasConceptScore W2767947994C95457728 @default.
• W2767947994 hasLocation W27679479941 @default.
• W2767947994 hasOpenAccess W2767947994 @default.
• W2767947994 hasPrimaryLocation W27679479941 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W1902633415 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W1981360173 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W1982977524 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W1991595756 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W1994033757 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2006895837 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2007568184 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2017792490 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2101879767 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2160745478 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2168021003 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2208427588 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2303324797 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2318455129 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2335743716 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2482618018 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2522735366 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2562490354 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W2898702502 @default.
• W2767947994 hasRelatedWork W190914460 @default.
• W2767947994 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2767947994 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2767947994 magId "2767947994" @default.
• W2767947994 workType "article" @default.