FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2768909119> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2768909119 endingPage "1" @default.
• W2768909119 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2768909119 abstract "Introduction to This MPQ Special Issue Julie Wargo Aikins (bio) and Hilary Horn Ratner (bio) The concept of resilience has been of particular interest to social scientists and practitioners, given the observation that children developing in adverse circumstances demonstrate a range of outcomes. Stress and adverse life events are well known to pose serious risks for child and adolescent development, yet not all youth facing difficult life circumstances exhibit negative outcomes; many demonstrate competence and optimal psychosocial adjustment in the face of numerous challenges (Harrison-Hale, McLoyd, & Smedley, 2004; Luthar & Cicchetti, 2000). Understanding which children might recover or under what circumstances positive development occurs even in the context of difficult beginnings is not only intriguing to researchers but also speaks to the possibilities for change. Garmezy, a pioneer in resilience theory in the 1970s, was influenced by Bleuler’s (1978) research that demonstrated positive social and occupational outcomes for some children whose mothers had schizophrenia. Garmezy (1974, 1985) went on to study other contexts of risk, including poverty and prejudice, and noted across many of the studies of the time that resilience was a process attributable to the interaction between the characteristics of the person, their environments, situations, and events rather than a static trait of the child. In this sense, whereas some stressors are significant [End Page 1] and may be exacerbated by children’s biological predispositions, family environments, and broader social contexts, these factors may also serve to mitigate risk and potentiate more positive outcomes. Trailblazing research over the next several decades focused on children across a variety of challenging contexts—for example, Isle of Wight (Rutter, 1979; Rutter, Cox, Tupling, Berger & Yule, 1975) Kauai studies (Werner & Smith, 1982); and children growing up during war (Fields, 1977; Zuckerman-Bareli, 1982)— and all pointed to the importance of personal dispositions, nurturing family relationships, and supportive and significant relationships with competent and prosocial adults in promoting positive outcomes. This emphasis on multiple and nested contextual spheres of influences reflects Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory (e.g., Bronfenbrenner, 1986, 2000, 2004; Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 1998), as well as Cicchetti’s integrative ecological–transactional model (Cicchetti & Lynch, 1993), in both of which is an exchange between the individuals and their environments. Ungar, Ghazinour, and Richter (2013) integrate models of resilience with Bronfenbrenner’s approach and emphasize that individuals’ ability to secure psychological, social, cultural, and physical resources enhances their likelihood of achieving positive developmental outcomes (i.e., resilience). From this perspective, understanding resilience requires considering the resources that individuals bring to situations of adversity, as well as their ability to garner further resources through their interactions with the environments in which they are embedded, potentially promoting more positive adaptation. As such, these considerations span both contextually proximal and distal levels of influence and interaction. The articles within this special issue emphasize interactions, highlighting primarily the role of the microsystemic contexts in the interplay between families and children in contributing to more positive adjustment during early development. Whereas microsystemic family processes have been well studied across a number of risks—for example, maltreatment (Cicchetti & Lynch, 1993), young maternal age (Easterbrooks, Chaudhuri, Bartlett, & Copeman, 2011), and socioeconomic risk (Rutter, 1979)—and protective factors—for example, cohesion (Pianta & Walsh, 1998), and adaptability and parenting effectiveness (Black & Lobo, 2008)—the articles in this special issue extend what is known about resilience in two important ways: (a) by conceptualizing family relationships as particularly salient moderators of risk during the developmental period of early childhood (i.e., infancy through the preschool years) and (b) by considering how joint constructions of regulation reflect the interactions between individuals and their family that in turn support resilience. [End Page 2] Although resilience research to date has identified multiple proximal and distal levels of supports (e.g., individual, family, and community) and has provided many examples of how these manifest across situations of risk, placing this work within a developmental framework may be key for understanding when and which systems are central and optimally mobilized when trying to temper outcomes of adversity. Perhaps, there are prime developmental periods in which one system is more likely to catalyze change than another. For instance, given the salience of parent–child relationships during early childhood, the..." @default.
• W2768909119 created "2017-12-04" @default.
• W2768909119 creator A5031120479 @default.
• W2768909119 creator A5067214703 @default.
• W2768909119 date "2017-01-01" @default.
• W2768909119 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2768909119 title "Introduction to This <em>MPQ</em> Special Issue" @default.
• W2768909119 cites W149515152 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1497798198 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1516727791 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1587176274 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1587235669 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1597255911 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1704892398 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1895732996 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1906073690 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1968264721 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W1991610467 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2018653636 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2020292986 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2076536489 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2085137634 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2107360293 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2108006105 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2111879285 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2112593159 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2122030229 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2129124032 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2142573073 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W2192303200 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W3145758588 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W591203817 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W595436072 @default.
• W2768909119 cites W615646786 @default.
• W2768909119 doi "https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.63.1.0001" @default.
• W2768909119 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2768909119 type Work @default.
• W2768909119 sameAs 2768909119 @default.
• W2768909119 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2768909119 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2768909119 hasAuthorship W2768909119A5031120479 @default.
• W2768909119 hasAuthorship W2768909119A5067214703 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C125370674 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C137176749 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C150966472 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C189326681 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConcept C95713431 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C125370674 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C137176749 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C138496976 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C150966472 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C15744967 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C166957645 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C17744445 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C189326681 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C199539241 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C2779343474 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C38652104 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C41008148 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C542102704 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C70410870 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C77805123 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C95457728 @default.
• W2768909119 hasConceptScore W2768909119C95713431 @default.
• W2768909119 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2768909119 hasLocation W27689091191 @default.
• W2768909119 hasOpenAccess W2768909119 @default.
• W2768909119 hasPrimaryLocation W27689091191 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W1967590988 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W2066538650 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W2139937656 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W2219457593 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W2793391258 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W2951702958 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W3164439041 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W4285148176 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W4285618664 @default.
• W2768909119 hasRelatedWork W4296921462 @default.
• W2768909119 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W2768909119 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2768909119 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2768909119 magId "2768909119" @default.
• W2768909119 workType "article" @default.