FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2769276504> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2769276504 endingPage "S44" @default.
• W2769276504 startingPage "S44" @default.
• W2769276504 abstract "BackgroundIn politically contested health debates, such as sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation, stakeholders seek to present evidence and arguments for or against specific policy initiatives, based on their interests. The news media have a crucial role in shaping public opinion and the political climate by selectively choosing which issues to focus on. This study examined how stakeholders' positions and evidence on SSB taxation were represented in the media with a view to informing future public health advocacy strategies.MethodsWe conducted a structured search of the Nexis database to identify all newspaper articles relating to SSB taxation published in 11 national UK newspapers between April 1, 2015, and Nov 30, 2016. Newspaper articles were excluded if they did not specifically cite stakeholder arguments for or against SSB taxation. The final sample contained 491 articles. Two reviewers double coded a 25% random sample of articles to develop and test a coding frame, before systematically coding the content of the remaining articles. Qualitative content data were entered into NVivo (version 11) and the constant comparative approach was used to identify emergent patterns and themes with particular emphasis on differences across the data.FindingsA wide range of stakeholders (n=287) presented evidence and arguments for or against SSB taxation (1924). Stakeholder positions were largely reflected by their vested political interests. Industry stakeholders were more likely to draw upon market justice frames in opposition to taxation, asserting that they were already taking voluntary action and such measures would be anti-competitive. Public health advocates and campaigners however were more likely to draw upon social justice frames in support of SSB taxation as one of a package of policy-level measures needed to change behaviour with regard to sugar consumption.InterpretationA complex, poorly-understood, interdependency exists between the framing of evidence in public policy debates, media representations of this evidence, and the influencing strategies used by stakeholders. These insights into stakeholders' framing of evidence could inform wider debates about the media strategies of global producers and marketers of unhealthy commodities manoeuvring to directly lobby the public, and help public health advocates develop more effective media advocacy strategies.FundingSupported by the UK Medical Research Council as part of the Understandings and Uses of Public Health Research programme (MC_U130085862, MC_UU_12017/6) and the Informing Healthy Public Policy programme (MC_UU_12017/15) and by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates (SPHSU15). The funders had no role in the commissioning of the study, writing of the abstract, or decision to submit it for publication." @default.
• W2769276504 created "2017-12-04" @default.
• W2769276504 creator A5001116196 @default.
• W2769276504 creator A5011699570 @default.
• W2769276504 creator A5021405331 @default.
• W2769276504 creator A5028971374 @default.
• W2769276504 creator A5032737180 @default.
• W2769276504 creator A5045333516 @default.
• W2769276504 creator A5064960187 @default.
• W2769276504 creator A5068698527 @default.
• W2769276504 date "2017-11-01" @default.
• W2769276504 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2769276504 title "Who says what about sugar-sweetened beverage tax? Stakeholders' framing of evidence: a newspaper analysis" @default.
• W2769276504 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32979-3" @default.
• W2769276504 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2769276504 type Work @default.
• W2769276504 sameAs 2769276504 @default.
• W2769276504 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2769276504 countsByYear W27692765042019 @default.
• W2769276504 countsByYear W27692765042020 @default.
• W2769276504 countsByYear W27692765042021 @default.
• W2769276504 countsByYear W27692765042022 @default.
• W2769276504 countsByYear W27692765042023 @default.
• W2769276504 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2769276504 hasAuthorship W2769276504A5001116196 @default.
• W2769276504 hasAuthorship W2769276504A5011699570 @default.
• W2769276504 hasAuthorship W2769276504A5021405331 @default.
• W2769276504 hasAuthorship W2769276504A5028971374 @default.
• W2769276504 hasAuthorship W2769276504A5032737180 @default.
• W2769276504 hasAuthorship W2769276504A5045333516 @default.
• W2769276504 hasAuthorship W2769276504A5064960187 @default.
• W2769276504 hasAuthorship W2769276504A5068698527 @default.
• W2769276504 hasBestOaLocation W27692765041 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C100001284 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C162446236 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C169087156 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C201280247 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C100001284 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C127413603 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C144024400 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C144133560 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C162324750 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C162446236 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C169087156 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C17744445 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C199539241 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C201280247 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C201305675 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C36289849 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C39549134 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C66938386 @default.
• W2769276504 hasConceptScore W2769276504C94625758 @default.
• W2769276504 hasLocation W27692765041 @default.
• W2769276504 hasOpenAccess W2769276504 @default.
• W2769276504 hasPrimaryLocation W27692765041 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W1966587093 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W2053191810 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W2065875232 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W2088709559 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W2788463913 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W2989489807 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W3002128112 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W3010632831 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W3154382124 @default.
• W2769276504 hasRelatedWork W4280652091 @default.
• W2769276504 hasVolume "390" @default.
• W2769276504 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2769276504 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2769276504 magId "2769276504" @default.
• W2769276504 workType "article" @default.