FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2770670898> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2770670898 endingPage "1243" @default.
• W2770670898 startingPage "1243" @default.
• W2770670898 abstract "<h3>Importance</h3> Advances in smartphone photography (both quality and image transmission) may improve access to care via direct parent-to-clinician telemedicine. However, the accuracy of diagnoses that are reliant on parent-provided photographs has not been formally compared with diagnoses made in person. <h3>Objective</h3> To assess whether smartphone photographs of pediatric skin conditions taken by parents are of sufficient quality to permit accurate diagnosis. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> A prospective study was conducted among 40 patient-parent dyads at a pediatric dermatology clinic at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia from March 1 to September 30, 2016, to assess concordance between diagnoses made by an independent pediatric dermatologist based on in-person examination and those based on parental photographs. Half of the patient-parent dyads were randomized for a secondary analysis to receive instructions on how best to take photographs with smartphones. Clinicians were blinded to whether parents had received photography instructions. <h3>Exposures</h3> Half of the patient-parent dyads received a simple, 3-step instruction sheet on how best to take photographs using a smartphone (intervention group); the other half did not (control group). <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis in the intervention vs control groups, as quantified using Cohen κ, a measure of interrater agreement that takes into account the possibility of agreement occurring by chance. <h3>Results</h3> Among the 40 patient-parent dyads (22 female children and 18 male children; mean [SD] age, 6.96 [5.23] years), overall concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis was 83% (95% CI, 71%-94%; κ = 0.81). Diagnostic concordance was 89% (95% CI, 75%-97%; κ = 0.88) in a subgroup of 37 participants with photographs considered of high enough quality to make a diagnosis. No statistically significant effect of photography instructions on concordance was detected (group that received instructions, 85%; group that did not receive instructions, 80%;<i>P</i> = .68). In cases of diagnostic disagreement, appropriate follow-up was suggested. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> Parent-operated smartphone photography can accurately be used as a method to provide pediatric dermatologic care. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT03246945" @default.
• W2770670898 created "2017-12-04" @default.
• W2770670898 creator A5026587670 @default.
• W2770670898 creator A5029696783 @default.
• W2770670898 creator A5046182165 @default.
• W2770670898 creator A5081129014 @default.
• W2770670898 creator A5082317407 @default.
• W2770670898 creator A5091181040 @default.
• W2770670898 date "2017-12-01" @default.
• W2770670898 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2770670898 title "Diagnostic Accuracy of Pediatric Teledermatology Using Parent-Submitted Photographs" @default.
• W2770670898 cites W1981358210 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W1985941943 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W1994603799 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2024430469 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2051363693 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2063796834 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2064526264 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2097509633 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2102924518 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2114330128 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2115421215 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2164030177 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2168322691 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2168681378 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2294840239 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2320449650 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2367695569 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2465582701 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W2469668433 @default.
• W2770670898 cites W4237808238 @default.
• W2770670898 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.4280" @default.
• W2770670898 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5817452" @default.
• W2770670898 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29141082" @default.
• W2770670898 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2770670898 type Work @default.
• W2770670898 sameAs 2770670898 @default.
• W2770670898 citedByCount "74" @default.
• W2770670898 countsByYear W27706708982018 @default.
• W2770670898 countsByYear W27706708982019 @default.
• W2770670898 countsByYear W27706708982020 @default.
• W2770670898 countsByYear W27706708982021 @default.
• W2770670898 countsByYear W27706708982022 @default.
• W2770670898 countsByYear W27706708982023 @default.
• W2770670898 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2770670898 hasAuthorship W2770670898A5026587670 @default.
• W2770670898 hasAuthorship W2770670898A5029696783 @default.
• W2770670898 hasAuthorship W2770670898A5046182165 @default.
• W2770670898 hasAuthorship W2770670898A5081129014 @default.
• W2770670898 hasAuthorship W2770670898A5082317407 @default.
• W2770670898 hasAuthorship W2770670898A5091181040 @default.
• W2770670898 hasBestOaLocation W27706708981 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C2776207752 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C118552586 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C126322002 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C138496976 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C141071460 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C142724271 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C15744967 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C160735492 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C160798450 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C162324750 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C168563851 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C187212893 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C2776207752 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C2779891985 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C2780665704 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C50522688 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C534262118 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C61863361 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C71924100 @default.
• W2770670898 hasConceptScore W2770670898C83849319 @default.
• W2770670898 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2770670898 hasLocation W27706708981 @default.
• W2770670898 hasLocation W27706708982 @default.
• W2770670898 hasLocation W27706708983 @default.
• W2770670898 hasLocation W27706708984 @default.
• W2770670898 hasOpenAccess W2770670898 @default.
• W2770670898 hasPrimaryLocation W27706708981 @default.
• W2770670898 hasRelatedWork W1964153126 @default.

• next