FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2772022075> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2772022075 endingPage "132" @default.
• W2772022075 startingPage "132" @default.
• W2772022075 abstract "We read with great interest the article by De Martino et al [[1]De Martino I. D'Apolito R. Waddell B.S. et al.Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review.Arthroplast Today. 2017; 3: 197Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar] on early intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD) in dual-mobility cup (DMC). In their discussion, the authors list 3 factors that may be more likely in the early IPD. We know of no evidence supporting the relationship of early IPD with head size of the inner bearing <28 mm or skirted femoral head. On the other hand, we agree that early IPD could be due to a DMC used in an off-label manner to revise an existing total hip arthroplasty, with retention of the femoral stem. We would stress the different reasons for early and late IPD. Late IPD, which occurs after 24 months, is mainly related to the wear of retentive rim in the “third joint” [[2]Noyer D. La troisième articulation des prothèses de hanche à double mobilité.Maîtrise Orthopédique. 2003; 121: 20Google Scholar]. This leads to failure of the capture mechanism between the mobile polyethylene liner and femoral head [[3]Lecuire F. Benareau J. Rubini J. et al.Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket.Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2004; 90: 249Crossref PubMed Google Scholar]. This complication depends on head/neck ratio and also the shape and the roughness of the neck are involved [[4]Vielpeau C. Lebel B. Ardouin L. et al.The dual mobility socket concept : experience with 668 cases.Int Orthop. 2011; 35: 225Crossref PubMed Scopus (134) Google Scholar]. Femoral necks with an unpolished surface and large diameters should be avoided. For similar reasons, care should be taken to ensure that the base of the Morse taper is fully covered by the femoral head, avoiding skirted femoral heads that can cause impingement with the polyethylene liner. Regarding early IPD, which is rarely described by European authors, it may be considered as a mechanical failure of the retentive rim. Since there is not enough time for the wear process, we think it is due to the specific design of the insert with its capture action. As described by Aslanian [[5]Aslanian T. All dual mobility cups are not the same.Int Orthop. 2017; 41: 573Crossref PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar], the liner's features of different DMC depend on four main factors: first, the diameter and relative position of the retentive ring to limit any harmful contact with the femoral stem; second, the over-covering surface of the head to create an intraprosthetic jump distance; third, the presence of protective beveled edge (chamfers) in contact areas with the prosthetic neck; and fourth, the elasticity of the polyethylene to allow the passage of the head through the retention rim without its plastic deformation leading to the failure of the capture mechanism. For this reason, it would be helpful if these technical data were provided by the manufacturers. This becomes fundamental above all if a DMC is used in an off-label manner to revise an existing total hip arthroplasty with retention of the femoral stem. Finally, De Martino reported that 6 of 15 early IPD (40%) after an attempt of close reduction of the large articulation occurred with modular dual mobility. As previously published by Plummer et al [[6]Plummer D.R. Haughom B.D. Della Valle C.J. Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty.Orthop Clin North Am. 2014; 45: 1Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (78) Google Scholar], we want to stress that the head diameter and the jump distance are actually reduced by this modularity. We appreciate the authors for attempting to answer an important and controversial topic with a systematic review and for the quality and the originality of their study. Download .pdf (.29 MB) Help with pdf files Conflict of Interest Statement for Aslanian Download .pdf (.1 MB) Help with pdf files Conflict of Interest Statement for Amendola Download .pdf (.3 MB) Help with pdf files Conflict of Interest Statement for Prudhon Download .pdf (.36 MB) Help with pdf files Conflict of Interest Statement for Tigani Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic reviewArthroplasty TodayVol. 3Issue 3PreviewDual mobility implants are subject to a specific implant-related complication, intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), in which the polyethylene liner dissociates from the femoral head. For older generation designs, IPD was attributable to late polyethylene wear and subsequent failure of the head capture mechanism. However, early IPDs have been reportedly affecting contemporary designs. Full-Text PDF Open AccessResponse to letter to the editor on “Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review”Arthroplasty TodayVol. 4Issue 1PreviewWe thank the Editor-in-Chief for the opportunity to respond to the Letter to the Editor by (Domenico et al [1]). The following are the responses to the main queries in the letter. Full-Text PDF Open Access" @default.
• W2772022075 created "2017-12-22" @default.
• W2772022075 creator A5018207952 @default.
• W2772022075 creator A5027172136 @default.
• W2772022075 creator A5048765207 @default.
• W2772022075 creator A5056106996 @default.
• W2772022075 date "2018-03-01" @default.
• W2772022075 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2772022075 title "Letter to the editor on “Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review”" @default.
• W2772022075 cites W1992812477 @default.
• W2772022075 cites W2076028177 @default.
• W2772022075 cites W2190681634 @default.
• W2772022075 cites W2574677695 @default.
• W2772022075 cites W2584999776 @default.
• W2772022075 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2017.11.004" @default.
• W2772022075 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5859209" @default.
• W2772022075 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29560409" @default.
• W2772022075 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2772022075 type Work @default.
• W2772022075 sameAs 2772022075 @default.
• W2772022075 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2772022075 countsByYear W27720220752020 @default.
• W2772022075 countsByYear W27720220752022 @default.
• W2772022075 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2772022075 hasAuthorship W2772022075A5018207952 @default.
• W2772022075 hasAuthorship W2772022075A5027172136 @default.
• W2772022075 hasAuthorship W2772022075A5048765207 @default.
• W2772022075 hasAuthorship W2772022075A5056106996 @default.
• W2772022075 hasBestOaLocation W27720220751 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C159122135 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C2775854910 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C2779100257 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C3018411727 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C3019025420 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C126322002 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C141071460 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C159122135 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C159985019 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C192562407 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C2775854910 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C2776541429 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C2779100257 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C29694066 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C3018411727 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C3019025420 @default.
• W2772022075 hasConceptScore W2772022075C71924100 @default.
• W2772022075 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2772022075 hasLocation W27720220751 @default.
• W2772022075 hasLocation W27720220752 @default.
• W2772022075 hasLocation W27720220753 @default.
• W2772022075 hasLocation W27720220754 @default.
• W2772022075 hasOpenAccess W2772022075 @default.
• W2772022075 hasPrimaryLocation W27720220751 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W188563965 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2050511753 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2058489177 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2316459117 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2332450638 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2333879843 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2362114707 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2372098723 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2431044021 @default.
• W2772022075 hasRelatedWork W2567385382 @default.
• W2772022075 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2772022075 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2772022075 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2772022075 magId "2772022075" @default.
• W2772022075 workType "letter" @default.