FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2772536789> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2772536789 endingPage "456" @default.
• W2772536789 startingPage "449" @default.
• W2772536789 abstract "Background Four nomograms are available for the prediction of lymph node invasion (LNI) prior to radical prostatectomy (RP): the Cagiannos, the 2012-Briganti, the Godoy, and the online-Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). None was tested in African Americans (AAs). Objective To perform a validation and head-to-head comparison of four nomograms for the prediction of LNI in AAs. Design, setting, and participants Within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (2010–2014), we identified 14 077 Caucasians and 2668 AAs with clinically localised prostate cancer. Intervention RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Predicted and observed LNI rates for the four nomograms were tested between AAs and Caucasians with Heagerty’s concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analyses (DCAs), and nomogram-derived cut-offs for avoided PLND and missed LNI cases. Results and limitations All C-index values were lower in AAs than in Caucasians: Cagiannos (76.1% vs 79.5%), Godoy (73.0% vs 79.4%), 2012-Briganti (73.3% vs 81.3%), and MSKCC (72.6% vs 81.6%). All four nomogram calibration plots showed invariably worse performances in AAs. In DCAs focusing on AAs, the Cagiannos nomogram provided the highest net benefit relative to the remaining three nomograms. In nomogram cut-off analyses testing the number of avoided PLND against the number of missed LNI cases, the Cagiannos nomogram yielded the best results when tested in AAs. However, in DCAs and cut-off analyses that compared AAs with Caucasians, AAs yielded less favourable outcomes regardless of which nomogram was tested. We lack a central pathology review and standardisation of PLND templates. Conclusions In AAs, the Cagiannos nomogram provides the optimal results relative to the remaining three nomograms. Nonetheless, all tested nomograms yielded worse metrics in AAs than in Caucasians. Patient summary All four tested nomograms can be equally considered in Caucasians. Conversely, the Cagiannos nomogram should be preferred in African Americans." @default.
• W2772536789 created "2017-12-22" @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5003968607 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5004446941 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5023266580 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5030545703 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5031550729 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5033309904 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5042606406 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5044228660 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5053749991 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5061623935 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5069476166 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5078216208 @default.
• W2772536789 creator A5081296401 @default.
• W2772536789 date "2019-05-01" @default.
• W2772536789 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2772536789 title "A Head-to-head Comparison of Four Prognostic Models for Prediction of Lymph Node Invasion in African American and Caucasian Individuals" @default.
• W2772536789 cites W1196192941 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W1977265573 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W1998341917 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2004625759 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2037762374 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2045030989 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2064468246 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2071811522 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2078319086 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2116692433 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2116887253 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2117792530 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2123664981 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2142395600 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2142607390 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2224702980 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2298026085 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2575513730 @default.
• W2772536789 cites W2606159587 @default.
• W2772536789 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.013" @default.
• W2772536789 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29249688" @default.
• W2772536789 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2772536789 type Work @default.
• W2772536789 sameAs 2772536789 @default.
• W2772536789 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2772536789 countsByYear W27725367892018 @default.
• W2772536789 countsByYear W27725367892019 @default.
• W2772536789 countsByYear W27725367892020 @default.
• W2772536789 countsByYear W27725367892021 @default.
• W2772536789 countsByYear W27725367892022 @default.
• W2772536789 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5003968607 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5004446941 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5023266580 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5030545703 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5031550729 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5033309904 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5042606406 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5044228660 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5053749991 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5061623935 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5069476166 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5078216208 @default.
• W2772536789 hasAuthorship W2772536789A5081296401 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C34626388 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C121608353 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C126322002 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C126894567 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C141071460 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C143998085 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C160798450 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C2775862295 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C2779466945 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C2780192828 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C2780849966 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C2989005 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C34626388 @default.
• W2772536789 hasConceptScore W2772536789C71924100 @default.
• W2772536789 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2772536789 hasLocation W27725367891 @default.
• W2772536789 hasLocation W27725367892 @default.
• W2772536789 hasOpenAccess W2772536789 @default.
• W2772536789 hasPrimaryLocation W27725367891 @default.
• W2772536789 hasRelatedWork W1597186893 @default.
• W2772536789 hasRelatedWork W1995511036 @default.
• W2772536789 hasRelatedWork W2270513615 @default.
• W2772536789 hasRelatedWork W2305959020 @default.
• W2772536789 hasRelatedWork W2973010805 @default.

• next