FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2775609855> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2775609855 abstract "As an experienced teacher and former course leader on a large undergraduate business programme the author was aware of students’ reluctance to engage in group assessment, especially on modules where the outcome would have an impact on final degree classification. However the same students were seeking employment in graduate positions in the corporate environment, where “In the list of the highly ranked skills, team working skills (67%) are followed by sector-specific skills and communication skills.” (Europa 2010). Accepting that group assessed assignments should continue to be a feature of assessment in the business school as a means of enhancing graduate employability, the author sought to explore ways of improving perceptions of group work via the peer assessment process. The focus of the study was a module in the subject area of Human Resource Management and Organisational Behaviour. As it was ‘elective’ in that students had chosen to study it as part of their degree programme, it was reasonable to assume a degree of willingness to engage in group work, as students opposed to the concept would have chosen an alternative module with different assessment methods. The assessment component of the module that was subject to peer assessment was a training programme, which comprised 40% of the marks for the module. The remaining marks were allocated to individual assessment elements. Participants were drawn from a range of business, accounting, marketing and HR related courses in the business school and the author aimed to survey their views on collaborative assessment with a view to incorporating improvements in the peer assessment model for the module, disseminating findings amongst academics involved in peer assessment at the business school and thus instigating discussion on a common model of peer assessment. A literature review and issues arising from the author’s own experience on the module informed the nature of the primary research which comprised a questionnaire survey and follow up interviews. Findings were that most students viewed peer assessment positively for its impact on motivation and learning and perceived it to be a fairer process than tutor allocated group marks alone, but that a significant minority of mainly non-native English speaking students were wary of peer assessment in terms of their competence in implementing it and their treatment by native English speaking students. Also students were willing to provide additional feedback to supplement the current ratings but were not interested in devising their own assessment criteria and not enthusiastic about implementing a common system of peer assessment throughout the business school." @default.
• W2775609855 created "2017-12-22" @default.
• W2775609855 creator A5006353819 @default.
• W2775609855 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2775609855 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2775609855 title "THE USE OF PEER ASSESSMENT ON A BUSINESS MODULE: WORKING TOWARDS AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM" @default.
• W2775609855 cites W117689072 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W12192200 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W1505999675 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W1994080470 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2005556519 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2008551018 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2031683043 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2036934753 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2061211568 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2063243744 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2069741599 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2076034083 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2105918120 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2120157008 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2127890855 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2141413057 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W2187373420 @default.
• W2775609855 cites W3004633798 @default.
• W2775609855 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2775609855 type Work @default.
• W2775609855 sameAs 2775609855 @default.
• W2775609855 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2775609855 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2775609855 hasAuthorship W2775609855A5006353819 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C15302153 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C53839665 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C111919701 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C127413603 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C144133560 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C15302153 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C15744967 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C161191863 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C162853370 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C169760540 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C18762648 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C19417346 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C26760741 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C2777855551 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C41008148 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C509550671 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C53839665 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C56995899 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C71924100 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C78519656 @default.
• W2775609855 hasConceptScore W2775609855C98045186 @default.
• W2775609855 hasLocation W27756098551 @default.
• W2775609855 hasOpenAccess W2775609855 @default.
• W2775609855 hasPrimaryLocation W27756098551 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W1493888613 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W1495378074 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W1576555657 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W1590474993 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W180683427 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2004246818 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2006094707 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2022511453 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2242692382 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2551738029 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2611574052 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2784281909 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2917022244 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2951170763 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2964230309 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W3021279062 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W3142720360 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W3160469355 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W40817311 @default.
• W2775609855 hasRelatedWork W2463460290 @default.
• W2775609855 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2775609855 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2775609855 magId "2775609855" @default.
• W2775609855 workType "article" @default.